Windows 8 Adoption Poor

Your average modern Linux user has probably grabbed their own ISO, burned a disc and installed the operating system themselves. I imagine their capacity to figure out a GUI is far higher (although I don't necessarily equate this to being 'smarter')
 
Where did it all go wrong? Power Rangers?



Is that why for so many years I've seen across many forums so many Windows users insulting those who use Linux?

Linux users seem able to cope better with new things/changes etc and act more mature in my experience ,personally I went over to Linux late but find it very enjoyable to use,especially with the wide range of distro's available.
 
Last edited:
Let's be fair, you can find the spectrum of opinion on most topics. Ubuntu/Unity for example -

That *hidden* global menu is the worst part of any desktop I have ever seen. Removing it just makes a frustratingly empty gnome-panel with no way to put anything useful on it.

The rest of interface doesn't improve things at all. Just plain silly. maybe on a tablet or tiny netbook it would make sense, but Unity just gets in my way on my PC. Not going to try Ubuntu again for the next few years.

Sound familiar?
 
Let's be fair, you can find the spectrum of opinion on most topics. Ubuntu/Unity for example -



Sound familiar?

Don't get me wrong you can find that with users on both sides of the fence(more on Windows side however).

The beauty of Linux is you can choose which Linux Distro you like (as you know there are many) and also customise it far more then you can with Windows , most Linux users are happy doing that and in general more adaptable then your Window user,throw in its free is just icing on the cake.
 
Linux users seem able to cope better with new things/changes etc and act more mature in my experience ,personally I went over to Linux late but find it very enjoyable to use,especially with the wide range of distro's available.


I only use win 7 for games everything else I use Ubuntu or Linux, my phone\tablet is android my Nas in Linux.
Waiting now for Ubuntu touch to come out.
 
I started using Windows 8 a few months ago, personally I've really enjoyed using it and can't really understand the criticism about the Metro UI. I use Start Is Back which boots me straight into desktop mode. I've found it useful to assign the Windows Key to show the Metro UI, the search function is great for finding specific programs. I have three monitors and the support in Windows has been absolutely seamless I haven't suffered any issues and the set up process is beyond easy.

All hail Windows!
 
Originally Posted by Tbid View Post
I've found it useful to assign the Windows Key to show the Metro UI


You have Windows key on keyboard for that or move your mouse to left bottom corner for Metro Start UI to pop up then click and even Metro Start on Charms bar when on old desktop UI.

I do like flicking my mouse cursor to bottom left corner to go to Metro which seems so natural to me now,don't really know what all the fuss is about with all the third party Start Mods ,not needed IMHO,same for boot to desktop ie only takes less then a second to go between either old desktop or Metro Start UI which I do everyday.
 
Last edited:
I only use win 7 for games everything else I use Ubuntu or Linux, my phone\tablet is android my Nas in Linux.
Waiting now for Ubuntu touch to come out.

I'm sort of similar ie have android 10.1" tablet and smartphone,Win8 Samsung laptop with Nvidia 650m chip,Win8 main gaming desktop PC,Win8/Ubuntu dual boot backup PC and last Linux Mint 13 LTS on my oldest PC.
 
Does touch Ubuntu run Android apps?

Seen a few statements like these,


Question : Since this is running in a Cyanogenmod chroot, can it run Native Android Apps?
Answer : No – The Cyanogenmod Fork has been stripped of the Dalvik VM and all other components necessary to run Android Applications. There is a likely possibility that someone will develop a “bluestacks” like emulator to allow android applications to run, but this will most likely not come from the Ubuntu team.

http://www.xda-developers.com/android/ubuntu-touch-next-generation-os-or-just-another-skin/


http://askubuntu.com/questions/247973/will-android-apps-be-compatible-with-the-ubuntu-phone-os



What apps can Ubuntu Touch run?
I did some research and this is what I believe it would be:

apps written for UT (developed with QML)
any linux binaries, given that they are compiled for ARM and that corresponding non-kernel libraries or services that are being used are present in UT
QEMU will help out for x86 versions
android apps: can be run if someone writes an emulator for UT (probably not developed by Canonical)
otherwise there will probably be a way to easily port android apps to UT
windows software: the ARM versions (WinRT) should be able to be run with the ARM version of Wine
for x86 versions QEMU can emulate the x86 environment for the x86 version of Wine to run the software
windows phone: not sure
OSX: through a virtual machine running OSX on top of QEMU
iOS: seems unlikely at the moment


Theoretically UT will be able to run A LOT of software... however, for the non-android and non-UT software it will depend on QEMU, Wine and the hardware of the phone. I'm confident about the hardware part (phones are getting more powerful by the day) and therefore believe that we'll be getting a powerful desktop with a vast selection of software to run when having connected the UT phone to a dock with screen and input devices.

The question for what apps UT can run seem to pop up quite a lot so making this a sticky thread might be a good idea...
I'm not 100% sure about the statements I made above so please do give feedback and suggestions for additional info.


http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2177299
 
Last edited:
I just installed Windows 8 on a 10 year old machine.
Half a gig memory and 1 single core but windows loads up fast and uses 400 meg. I thought that was alright even though XP could load and only use 100 meg.
I used the £25 offer so this was the cheapest setup for someone who just wants to browse their camera photos on a big screen


On the other hand I'm sitting here looking at win8 task manager while browsing the internet and its used up 12 gig. Seems to do both extremes and theres never enough memory for it. Needs a slimfast button


My sister tells me in their office they hate win8 because its so confusing.
I mentioned it just needs a little utility to fix it but of course this is never done by your average user.
So they extremely dislike all this pop up stuff and how they have to take an hour to relearn how to open even a document to the point they would rather switch off the machine and use an old windows copy elsewhere

Again a little button, revert or whatever you want to call it. Win7 mode, it would take MS no time at all to include that.


criticism about the Metro UI. I use Start Is Back which boots me straight into desktop mode.
I only ever use metro when the screen is off if that makes any sense. Because its a few keystrokes to load anything, the mouse is slower. No need to assign win key to metro, win+Q or many other combos should probably still work
 
Last edited:
I've been using Windows 8 since before its launch, and now I'm finding Windows 7 like I find Windows XP ; Painful to use.
Just simple things. I don't like having to go into msconfig to change start up applications, rather do it in task manager with it showing me the impact etc.

Still not perfect, using metro apps with keyboard and mouse still has me wanting to jab my monitor like I do my Vivobook and Surface.
 
On the other hand I'm sitting here looking at win8 task manager while browsing the internet and its used up 12 gig. Seems to do both extremes and theres never enough memory for it. Needs a slimfast button

It's known as caching. Empty RAM is a waste.
 
Back
Top Bottom