The railways used to be a lot more bare, in part because if any wood built up then sparks from a stream train would probably set it on fire on a hot summers day before long...
'vegetation management' is a major job for the railway and they do do it, there is just rather a lot of railway to cover (and has to be done outside nesting season etc). Also it always tends to prompt complaints when they properly clear an area of railway (where they do actually own enough land to do so) - it might make the railways more reliable (less risk of branches and trees on the track or in wires, as well as leaf fall, and depending on the character of the local area cutting trees down can actually make slopes more stable, and reduce likelihood of damage to bridges o er the railway etc) but all people see is loss of trees and undergrowth. Unfortunately there are actually pretty good reasons for cutting down trees next to the railway and we should probably just have more trees elsewhere if having them cut down is such a loss.
Storm-wise it's been a very windy and wet in Warrington. Subjectively worse than Eunice I think.