The met office did a good job in my opinion. Was it the worst in history? No. However it was probably the most prepared, analysed and well executed.
The met office have to message based on the distribution of probabilistic scenarios over time. The resulting damage all depends what is in the path and that's way too many variables other than apply an alert based on estimated maximum windspeeds.
So - hats off to the met.
The met office have to message based on the distribution of probabilistic scenarios over time. The resulting damage all depends what is in the path and that's way too many variables other than apply an alert based on estimated maximum windspeeds.
So - hats off to the met.