will they still be there and getting enough game time to teach him?Imagine how good he can be learning from Kroos and Modric. And to say you've played for Real Madrid is always a feather in the hat.
will they still be there and getting enough game time to teach him?Imagine how good he can be learning from Kroos and Modric. And to say you've played for Real Madrid is always a feather in the hat.
If its only 100m then I dont see why we couldnt go in for him, theres been rumours of us stumping up 70-80m for a midfielder anyway, you'd think that if we are going to whack out 80m on a midfielder we could have done the extra 20 for Bellingham. Its not an enormous difference between 80 and 100 after all. 80 and 130-150 yes, big difference but 80 up to 100 isnt a huge jump.Rumours circulating of Bellingham to Madrid, if its true and big if I'm not surprised.
Said it all along I would have been very surprised if we got him as I don't see us paying the fee required ontop of still need other midfielders too.
100m on him then still needing least another 2 midfielders alone, FSG won't spend that
That will be a real shame, I get that he maybe isnt in the best situation to be getting playing time but he has an massive amount to offer as a coach, particular to a youth/reserve team. I had really hoped that if he was going to not be playing for us that he might move into the staff instead and stay.Milner close to Brighton according to sky sports
I imagine its more then 100 but we dont know the rest of the demands, you could be talking silly money in wages etc.If its only 100m then I dont see why we couldnt go in for him, theres been rumours of us stumping up 70-80m for a midfielder anyway, you'd think that if we are going to whack out 80m on a midfielder we could have done the extra 20 for Bellingham. Its not an enormous difference between 80 and 100 after all. 80 and 130-150 yes, big difference but 80 up to 100 isnt a huge jump.
Decent profit for an above average winger.
Would doubt the fee but he’s a player we had a long term interest in.Decent profit for an above average winger.
Would doubt the fee but he’s a player we had a long term interest in.
There’s a list of players that are long term targets and we rarely swap and changed. The club is more than prepared to wait for the players we want often over multiple windows.He’s already rejected you, why would you want him?
He’s already rejected you, why would you want him?
You can tell that after 2 transfer windows?There’s a list of players that are long term targets and we rarely swap and changed. The club is more than prepared to wait for the players we want often over multiple windows.
3 windows.You can tell that after 2 transfer windows?
Well forest paid for him hah we where quoted 60 was it at the start!Ok 3 then, point still stands, I think it's a little early to make claims of a long term transfer strategy. Gordon was definitely bought at an inflated price too!
You didn't pick Gordon up for a comfortable price. No one else wanted him. Chelsea were prepared to pay a mental price, you were slightly less mental for a player that scored 3 goals. You won a bidding war against no one. Don't get me wrong Newcastle are doing superb but there's fewer more inflated prices than Gordon to Newcastle. Richarlison was expensive but at least he was doing it in a poor team and in the national side.3 windows.
Botman and Gordon
Reused to pay the inflated price.
Played the waiting game pick them up at the price we were comfortable with.
What was your opinion of him when he played for you? I've watched him multiple times for Barca and didn't turn up in Quite a few games. Can't say it would excite me signing him, have the same feeling about it as the Gordon transfer.