• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Wolfenstien 2 Vulkan benchmarks:

^ That's a cut scene, what about gameplay?

I benched right from the end of that cut scene which is where gameplay starts.
 
AMDMatt said:
^ That's a cut scene, what about gameplay?

I benched right from the end of that cut scene which is where gameplay starts.
Click to expand...
Still using the game engine, isn't it? Trouncing and wiping the floor, a double whammy :p

I'll do a benchmark later if someone can tell me how as not even started the game yet.
 
More willy waving than a pride parade through a Turkish bath house here.

At what point does the experience vary with a shooter on rails after 70fps?
 
Rroff said:
Side by side AMD generally looks more vibrant but its barely perceptable, the colours on nVidia somehow look more drab - I can only assume it is some difference with the video output chip(s) used - but you can get the same thing on nVidia by nudging the digital vibrance up by 2% - though I'm not a fan of playing with that as it tends to reduce colour accuracy if you change it much.
Click to expand...

Yea I noticed that when going from a 970 to a 480. You see it most with bright things like lightning effects and explosions. Colour banding in some games seemed much worse on the geforce card too, it didn't appear to blend things as nicely.
 
Last edited:
Muhammad.Abdelhameed said:
That was in the past though, both companies keep watch over the other to expose any cheating, AMD exposed NVIDIA cheating on 3D Mark 2001 back in the day and their inability to render HDR with AA back during the Geforce 7 era. NVIDIA on the other hand exposed AMD tampering with HDR elements in some games, their Tessellation factor tampering and worse quality AF during HD4000/HD5000 era. They are at each other's throat when it comes to IQ since it undermines their efforts in designing solid architectures. None of them will allow the other to gain an unfair advantage through reduction of image quality, they will expose such behavior immediately.
Click to expand...

Lets not forget Quark3 and the bit map optimisations in the Radeon 8500 days
 
Well I just started playing the game and depending on the scene (ie outdoor or indoor) im getting around 100-130fps in most cases with the highest ive noticed being 150fps ish. I just started Manhattan getting off the boat is just under 100fps.

This is at 3440x1440 at max settings, 5820k @4.0ghz and a single 1080ti. Am I hitting the expected performance ?

Anyways I'm loving the game like the first eps the little bits of humour as just like the first it dose not take it self to seriously which most games seems to do atm. I just home theirs a "i'm killing nazi's on the moon" like moment

TheRealDeal said:
He has and it needs to be seen to be believed. He's not your usual PC noob either and has been building them for over 20 years. He got me into PC's :D:D:D:D:D. It really is not settings as we checked it, the Nvidia card/monitor just can't replicate the AMD side for whatever reason. It's not that the Nvidia side does not look good it just does not look as good as the AMD side. It's not like his 4k Freesync monitor was on the expensive side as it was under £400. To me it looks like what Nvidia has always looked like and that's washed out. Like i say it's enough for him to think about a downgrade.

An Acer Predator is a decent G-Sync monitor as well so should be doing pretty decent out of the box. The Freesync monitor is not tweaked either. Any how this has been said for many a year and there has to be some truth to it as i can't remember it being said much about the other way round.

It's not something i would say is gospel but i tend to believe my own eyes and have seen this first hand and do so every few weeks when i am through for a gaming night. Screen shots and Video's might not even show it but in real life side by side it's hard to deny. So far i have watched 2 of the videos and the AMD side looks better though.
Click to expand...


You be surprised the number for 20 year experience expert users don't know what regedit is or what Dir /w does
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree about "out the box" colours on AMD looking nicer. Like Rroff said though, add a couple of degrees on digital vibrance in the NCP and no way of telling which is which, other than frames.
 
Gregster said:
I agree about "out the box" colours on AMD looking nicer. Like Rroff said though, add a couple of degrees on digital vibrance in the NCP and no way of telling which is which, other than frames.
Click to expand...

I found the colours washed out on Nvidias default setting compared to AMDs, but once id upped the Digital Vibrance a bit, identical.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom