Woolwich serious incident

Or I could just follow you around the forum waiting for your next RSS feed :)

Or a video of a plane.
To be fair, he's right - it's a forum for debating, not a news feed.

I have serious problems with Gilly posting his views on the thread and moderating it at the same time. It's obvious he has a bias and he is free to express it. But to threaten to close it because he sees views he doesn't agree with is distrubing to me.

Gilly, by all means post, but by posting you views i feel you should forfit you right to moderate in this thread and get someone else to be the mod here.
Not allowing racism to be posted on a public forum isn't the same as moderator abuse based on political preference.
 
Last edited:
To be fair there were decent updates on the current situation until all the BS started :)

But hey carry on, it's thrilling.
Ironic really, as the last two posts you made contributed nothing to either the story or the debate which came from it.

Keep 'contributing'.

If you want news updates then how about...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/
http://news.sky.com/
http://www.itv.com/news/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/

Just saying...

Personally I've found this thread pretty illuminating, as I now understand why I disagree with certain posters on so many different issues.

It seems they are idiots (who would have guessed).
 
Last edited:
UKIP aren't a racist party

Yes they are.

Do you agree with the concept of international borders?

Yes.

I have serious problems with Gilly posting his views on the thread and moderating it at the same time. It's obvious he has a bias and he is free to express it. But to threaten to close it because he sees views he doesn't agree with is distrubing to me.

Gilly, by all means post, but by posting you views i feel you should forfit you right to moderate in this thread and get someone else to be the mod here.

I'm truly sorry you feel that way.
Not allowing racism to be posted on a public forum isn't the same as moderator abuse based on political preference.

Well explained. Thanks :)

So you don't vote for any party then? I mean you're well aware that all parties have racist people inside them.

Having racist people in them and having racist ideals is different.
 
Yes they are.

What polices are specifically racist? They are somewhat xenophobic, blatantly homophobic and generally poplularist but while I am not entirely sure they are racist. They are not really far right either, though definitely right wing.
 
So you do vote for closet racist parties, thought so. :)
So by that logic, every single large business (as they would have at least one racist in say) is a closet racist organisation?.

As I said before, you fail at logic - please form better arguments.
 
Which parts of liberalism do you not agree with?.

The bits where we must open our borders to uncontrolled immigration. The bit where we have to promote other people's cultures above our own. The bit where we get so scared of tackling crime in any non-native culture for fear of the racism tag.
 
The bits where we must open our borders to uncontrolled immigration.
We don't have an open border policy.

The bit where we have to promote other people's cultures above our own.
This doesn't happen, nowhere do we have a mandatory "you must promote different cultures" rule.

The bit where we get so scared of tackling crime in any non-native culture for fear of the racism tag.
Neither does this.
 
What polices are specifically racist? They are somewhat xenophobic, blatantly homophobic and generally poplularist but while I am not entirely sure they are racist. They are not really far right either, though definitely right wing.

My understanding is that right-wing is mainstream right and far right is simply beyond that.

By showing their xenophobic, anti-Islam, homophobic, anti-foreigner colours; not to mention their views on hunting, tax, etc. I'd place them well beyond right wing.

Their whole ethos is based on racist ideologies. Deuse seems to think that other pasties are racist without showing it. Does that make UKIP better because they do show it?

Show me another party that has courted so many accusations, so much in-fighting and drama with so many of their members overtly announcing their backwards morality and ideals.

As I have already asked but again Citation needed.

I'm sorry, is that a question?

So you do vote for closet racist parties, thought so. :)

Where did I say that? Don't put words into my mouth.
 
Show me another party that has courted so many accusations, so much in-fighting and drama with so many of their members overtly announcing their backwards morality and ideals.

Well there are two major parties that do that every day. Whether or not most of it goes public is another story.
 
I'd love to see a poll of who would vote what on this forum, let's see just how many UKIP, BNP ,LABOUR ,CONSERVS e.t.c there really are! Leave the comments out, just a poll

Wonder if OCUK has the balls ;)
 
I have serious problems with Gilly posting his views on the thread and moderating it at the same time. It's obvious he has a bias and he is free to express it. But to threaten to close it because he sees views he doesn't agree with is distrubing to me.

Gilly, by all means post, but by posting you views i feel you should forfit you right to moderate in this thread and get someone else to be the mod here.

I got suspended for calling the biggest bigot to post in the thread a ****.

He's not biased.
 
You mean the general populace?

Hmm well it's more of a forum thing I guess, though some news sites have used polls as a general populace ref before. I'd just like to see for myself at least, what people are or would be voting for on this forum.

More than likely conserv would be top, but who knows :)
 
Back
Top Bottom