Caporegime
whut?
There are many conspiracy theorys about it being an inside job
you mean the planes never hit the building afterall ??!!!
World Trade Center Dust Contains Evidence of Explosives
- Thread starter SexyGreyFox
- Start date
you mean the planes never hit the building afterall ??!!!
This just shows how paranoid some people are?
The us govermanet have proven it dosnt actually need a reason to go to war.
wmd? anyone?
The kinetic force alone from a plane traveling at that velocity will cause un repairable damage to the super structure that is not desgined to take blows at the top of its tower.
the moment of the enregy alone would have twisted the foundations of the building or at least shered them.
let alone cofined avaition grade jet fuel exploding, whould have stripped the super structures concrete protection and superheated the metal causing ta chang ein the meatl grade, either making it brital or bendier than the buildingrequired, resuting in a colaspe
The us govermanet have proven it dosnt actually need a reason to go to war.
wmd? anyone?
The kinetic force alone from a plane traveling at that velocity will cause un repairable damage to the super structure that is not desgined to take blows at the top of its tower.
the moment of the enregy alone would have twisted the foundations of the building or at least shered them.
let alone cofined avaition grade jet fuel exploding, whould have stripped the super structures concrete protection and superheated the metal causing ta chang ein the meatl grade, either making it brital or bendier than the buildingrequired, resuting in a colaspe
Of course not, all the home movies, CNN, FOX footage etc were all fakes produced by the NWO.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
Firstly I'd like to say I in no way believe it, its retarded and theres several reasons why.
But I'd also like to say that theoretically, especially as it had an inner support square aswell as the main walls( I seem to remember), it would surely be perfectly possible to "help" its destruction with "some" thermite in concealed shafts in the centre that no, you wouldn't have seen burning. Saying there was thermite doesn't instantly mean they have to use a ludicrous amount that would blow the top of the building off.
But likewise, I didn't read the paper but someone quoted someone was taking samples 10 mins after the 2nd tower collapsed? I just don't believe that, people were panicing, people were dying left right and centre, the air was still completely filled with dust only 10 mins after the collapse, other than a few firefighters with breathing kit heading in to try to find survivors, and people running away from the building, no one was collecting samples as people choked and bleed to death around them, thats not what people do. Its ludicrous to suggest that any policeman or firemen was doing anything other than trying to save peoples, or their own, lives. No way in hell so soon after with dust everywhere people were taking samples.
AS others have said anyway, there would be many plausible reasons for traces of welding materials to be around let alone the fact that people were using equipment to cut and burn through metal and debrie for weeks afterwards.
But I'd also like to say that theoretically, especially as it had an inner support square aswell as the main walls( I seem to remember), it would surely be perfectly possible to "help" its destruction with "some" thermite in concealed shafts in the centre that no, you wouldn't have seen burning. Saying there was thermite doesn't instantly mean they have to use a ludicrous amount that would blow the top of the building off.
But likewise, I didn't read the paper but someone quoted someone was taking samples 10 mins after the 2nd tower collapsed? I just don't believe that, people were panicing, people were dying left right and centre, the air was still completely filled with dust only 10 mins after the collapse, other than a few firefighters with breathing kit heading in to try to find survivors, and people running away from the building, no one was collecting samples as people choked and bleed to death around them, thats not what people do. Its ludicrous to suggest that any policeman or firemen was doing anything other than trying to save peoples, or their own, lives. No way in hell so soon after with dust everywhere people were taking samples.
AS others have said anyway, there would be many plausible reasons for traces of welding materials to be around let alone the fact that people were using equipment to cut and burn through metal and debrie for weeks afterwards.
thermite = iron rust plus aluminum dust, iron building out in the elements after crah , aluminum window frames and airplanes = their thermite mix....
As measured using DSC, the material ignites and reacts
vigorously at a temperature of approximately
430 °C, with a rather narrow exotherm, matching
fairly closely an independent observation on a known
super-thermite sample. The low temperature of ignition
and the presence of iron oxide grains less than
120 nm show that the material is not conventional
thermite (which ignites at temperatures above 900 °C)
but very likely a form of super-thermite
Based on these observations, we conclude that the red
layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC
dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating
nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or
explosive material.
I'm not that fussed either way, but still there are some interesting theories out there THIS is quite an interesting video. Showing puffs of dust bellow the main dust cloud (signs of explosives?) the fact if fell in a shot time, but having to crash through all the floors would have made it slower etc.
They have some interesting points, but then again i'm no engineer.
There are also some interesting theories about the pentagon.
They have some interesting points, but then again i'm no engineer.
There are also some interesting theories about the pentagon.
Last edited:
3 buildings fell on 9/11, only 2 were hit by planes.
They never mentioned WTC7 in the official report though, it was such a minor thing I guess not worthy of investigating how a skycraper (like 2 others on the day) could fall perfectly vertically and at freefall speed due to a few office fires.
Well at least the rest of the world can build skyscrapers that can burn on all floors for days without imploding on themselves.
Last edited:
There is no conspiracy, it's obvious they just kept huge amounts of fireworks there for party time.
Haaaaang on just a second maybe there was some large scale welding required to build such a massive structure, there goes the fireworks conspiracy.
If people are convinced a conspiracy exists then they will find weird and wonderful ways to support their views.
Man of Honour
This was SUPER-THERMITE, not normal thermite, ST is used in high grade explosives and other industrial areas - not on fireworks or an everyday site.
I was going to post this with way more info the other day but I thought I better not due to the debating factor!
I was going to post this with way more info the other day but I thought I better not due to the debating factor!
And several huge *****ing chunks missing where they where torn out by hundreds of tons of falling wreckage.
if the WTC hadn't been specifically designed to collapse in on itself in case of failure then there would have been much more destruction as it fell sideways like most skyscrapers would.
Associate
Soldato
I dont normally fall for conspisory theories in general as most of them are retarded. Though watching a documentary on the airliner that apparently hit the Pentagon did make me question a few things tbf. Like the fact that the place must be one of the most closely monitored buildings in the US yet there is only 1 CCTV video (which has a different date on the film) and even that didnt even show a plane hitting the building just an explosion. Apparently a near by petrol station had some of its CCTV cameras covering parts of the Pentagon and they were also seized by FBI but weren't released.
Caporegime
[TW]Fox;13849100 said:
They tried that one 1'st time, it made a big hole but otherwise failed.
As it happened, planes turned out to be more efficient at knocking 'em down.
I'm tired, are you just being sarcastic m8?
???
do you not think that having two of the worlds tallest buildings completely collapse right next to it might just have played a part.....
If it was built in any other country it would have remained standing???
Do you work in McDonalds for a living?