There's a joke here somewhereIt's a hard one for me.
in 1990 you could get 20 Embassy No.1 for aorund 1.60, the jizz mag was around 1.99 and swan vesta's were 10p, so £1 left for 2 packs of tangy tom's and 2 packs of cheeseburger quarterbacks and a rum and raisin cornetto to get your energy levels back up after knocking one out to he readers wives section in Escort.
It's a hard one for me. On one hand, it's a harmful and disgusting industry full of degenerates, but on the other hand I'm not really a fan of restricting and censoring the Internet.
It's a hard one for me. On one hand, it's a harmful and disgusting industry full of degenerates, but on the other hand I'm not really a fan of restricting and censoring the Internet.
rubbish.. on reading this you just toured sex shows and pro's while abroad.. pervert lolYou see I'm not in total disagreement but having spent time working in Amsterdam and Hamburg where the sex industry is quite prolific and overt you realise that it's just a normal human nature thing. Sex and being sexual is a very normal healthy thing.
However glamourising it like it has been I think does create a perverted (pun intended) sense of reality, and where men don't necessarily realise what "real" sexual relationships are like. Whether you're poly-amorous relationship type, a "Joey Tribiani" type or someone who has had several medium term monogamous relationships, excessive access to this stuff can probably lead to unrealistic expectations.
Being able to log online and see something a bit risqué is far different to seeing it in person or asking to do it with another human being. Everyone has had their fantasy of some kind, some have fulfilled them some stick to the internet to achieve them, regardless the stark reality of it is so detached to what people have access to now.
I mean some of the shows in Amsterdam were hugely explicit and probably not allowed anymore (maybe they are? It's been a while!) However what you can actually see/access now online in comparison is actually way over the top. Visceral experience changes the dynamic completely to the quick thrill of the internet.
I personally wouldn't care if it was blocked or made harder to access as I do think a lot of people are not able to differentiate or at least separate reality of fantasies and real ones, or at least not willing to pay for it, or find someone that is wired that way to enjoy it with you!
Just my perspective.probably not a popular opinion.
Not entirely incorrect. I was also paid to be there.rubbish.. on reading this you just toured sex shows and pro's while abroad.. pervert lol
we have probably met but i would have been behind you.Not entirely incorrect. I was also paid to be there.![]()
It'll just push the younger generation to use VPNs and TOR browsers, which can potentially be a lot worse.
we have probably met but i would have been behind you.![]()
The hub and some of their partner sites I believe banned all amateur non verified accounts because of the lack of verification.I think it was Pornhub or some other site got a lot of negative press a few years ago and done a massive nuke of content as it had/has no way of really identifing where the content came from, illegal content, copyrighted material, no age/vefication checks, etc
My post was a bit of a facetious one to just state that its not like you cant type anything porn related into google and be swamped with results.I can honestly say I've never typed that in to google, or any other search engine.
I thought google had a safe search function?
that brush you paint with.,..... it is pretty wide. I don't doubt there are plenty like you say but am sure there are others who are perfectly normal just doing a job.It's a hard one for me. On one hand, it's a harmful and disgusting industry full of degenerates, but on the other hand I'm not really a fan of restricting and censoring the Internet.
Tbh I'd not considered ad locks before, but the way youtube is getting its not a bad idea.i thought there was talk of the ads being delivered in a different way so it could bypass your plan though? When you said not 16, I though you meant 14/15 sorry, sounds like less than that (I've never actually met/or know anyone autistic so I've no experience with how to deal with them).Did you miss the 'not 16 in the head' and 'Autistic' parts? He learned to cross a road alone safely, and go to the corner shop alone in the last two months, for context. (Edit to add): He had unfiltered access last year, age 15... Until some bloke on Discord (which he installed himself) told him to set up a PayPal business account and some other online accounts, and to send him the logins and his card details. Which he did, because his 'friend' had known him for 'weeks now' and was therefore 'trustworthy'. Damn straight he gets logged and monitored now, because he needs it. Parents in knowing best shocker.
Every parent makes their own judgement calls. For me, I wouldn't trust my 5 year old to have the capacity to know what was or was not inappropriate - that's my job as their parent. Not everything kids shouldn't see shouts 'Boo' and makes them afraid. Some things (and people) are much more nefarious. As for ads - why are there any on your network at all? For maximum nerd points (and protection for your devices, your family and your sanity), set up a PiHole, AdGuard Home, Unbound with blocklists, or install apps like AdGuard. Job jobbed.
or maybe just a return to goold old fashioned parenting where parents actually take responsibilty and interest in their kids rather than thinking that School is just a day care centre to offload them to and expect the teachers to parent them instead ?