Your Political Compass

humbug said:
You would have the feminist up in shrills with that, it suggests Woman are Neurotic and Emotional while Men are Pragmatic and Logical, i'm not saying its wrong, just saying its not PC :D
Click to expand...

Yes, I think that's his intention. Not very "live and let live" so must fall into the upper category. :)
 
Skunkworks said:
Here's the 2018 version of the axis. Looking back over the thread, a lot of results make far more sense now!

I5da5kL.gif
Click to expand...


From your own chart, The Tories, Republicans and the former UKIP (rip) were right up with that "horrible ideas that have to be forced on people". Current Labour is close to the center, right near the "Live and let live"

But I disagree with you "Progmatic Logical-> Neortoic Emotional as a 1-D axis. Pragmatic-Logical is a broad areas cvering the center. Neurortic-Emotional is anything on any of the extremes.
 
D.P. said:
From your own chart, The Tories, Republicans and the former UKIP (rip) were right up with that "horrible ideas that have to be forced on people". Current Labour is close to the center, right near the "Live and let live"

But I disagree with you "Progmatic Logical-> Neortoic Emotional as a 1-D axis. Pragmatic-Logical is a broad areas cvering the center. Neurortic-Emotional is anything on any of the extremes.
Click to expand...

Banning people from standing in elections because they don't fit the criteria for a predefined outcome is not live and let live, its very much interventionist, some might even say dictatorial, its also based on feelings of what should be right and wrong rather than practical pragmatism.
 
humbug said:
Banning people from standing in elections because they don't fit the criteria for a predefined outcome is not live and let live, its very much interventionist, some might even say dictatorial, its also based on feelings of what should be right and wrong rather than practical pragmatism.
Click to expand...

you do understand how Political parties operate right?
 
D.P. said:
you do understand how Political parties operate right?
Click to expand...

That depends on the political party and your definition, Most political parties have some form of social engineering but the Labour party are the only ones who actively discriminate in elections based on their own take on social justice, which isn't even democratic and a slippery slope.
 
humbug said:
That depends on the political party and your definition, Most political parties have some form of social engineering but the Labour party are the only ones who actively discriminate in elections based on their own take on social justice, which isn't even democratic and a slippery slope.
Click to expand...


Thanks for answering my question, Vincent called it. This goes along well with the whole Nazis not capitalist garbage
 
Yadda said:
Owen Jones didn't post that. It was a parody account (obviously).
Click to expand...

I stand corrected but i have seen him make boldfaced statements just as insane, she is still an MP, almost no mainstream media reported on it.

When you read **** like that you begin to understand why the police knowing for 10 years or so what was going on in Rotherham did absolutely nothing, and no, conservative front bencher's are not much better.
 
Don't believe everything you read. Especially if it confirms your existing bias. Those right wing trolls are rascals. :)
 
humbug said:
I stand corrected but i have seen him make boldfaced statements just as insane, she is still an MP, almost no mainstream media reported on it.

When you read **** like that you begin to understand why the police knowing for 10 years or so what was going on in Rotherham did absolutely nothing, and no, conservative front bencher's are not much better.
Click to expand...

She is still an MP because she reversed her re-tweet within a few minutes, an obvious misunderstanding and since she doesn't display such obliviously stupid views then it was clearly an accident.


Unlike some other who continuously tweet the most absurd or abhorrent views from the right.
 
D.P. said:
That was a parody account, and naz Shah unliked and deleted that tweet within a couple of minutes.
Click to expand...

She deleted it, i don't know if it was in a couple of minutes, to me how long it took is not relevant, the fact is she made that statement in the first place, you don't make mistakes saying things like that you mean it and i think she was advised to take it down, this isn't a case of a slip of the tongue, it very clear in its meaning, Those girls should shut their mouths in the interests of diversity, that's what she said.
 
Last edited:
humbug said:
She deleted it, i don't know if it was in a couple of minutes, to me how long it took is not relevant, the fact is she made that statement in the first place, you don't make mistakes saying things like that you mean it and i think she was advised to take it down.
Click to expand...
Everything, including children, is expendable to the diversity cultists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom