Well i'm at Stanford and all I can say is that the education is not that expensive, and that the quality of education is much better than in the UK.
Didn't teach you leadership skills or motivation skills to those in your group did it
Well i'm at Stanford and all I can say is that the education is not that expensive, and that the quality of education is much better than in the UK.
For a Start the Right to bear arms takes us back ooo 150-200 years so no just no!
Didn't teach you leadership skills or motivation skills to those in your group did it
More to the point, the full passage of the Second Amendment reads: "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
It's as clear as mud - is the state militia relevant? What about being well regulated? The British aren't coming to invade, so what is the need to continue to possess firearms? Self-defence is not mentioned by the amendment at all, so how can it be a constitutionally compliant argument?
I just don't understand the need for gun ownership in the US. More to the point, I've never heard a really coherent argument that has ever made me think "gee, I've never thought about it that way, I guess that is a good point."
I'm not saying that there isn't a good reason for gun ownership, but for the life of me I cannot figure out what it is, nor has it ever been pointed out to me.
Look at the contemporary state constitutions, they are much clearer.
http://www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/beararms/statecon.htm
for example:
Arizona: The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself or the State shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain, or employ an armed body of men.
Colorado: The right of no person to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall be called in question; but nothing herein contained shall be construed to justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons.
Ok, so what's the need as per the second part of my post?
Will McAvoy said:Will: “It’s not the greatest country in the world, professor. That’s my answer.”
Professor: “You’re saying…”
Will: “Yes.”
Professor: “Let’s talk about…”
Will: “Fine.”
(Will turns to Sharon)
Will: “Sharon, the NEA is a loser. Yeah, it accounts for a penny out of our paycheck, but he…”
(Gestures to Louis)
Will: “…gets to hit you with it anytime he wants. It doesn’t cost money…it costs votes. It costs airtime and column inches. You know why people don’t like liberals? Cause they lose. If liberals are so ****ing smart, how come they lose so god damn always?”
Sharon: “Hey…”
(Will turns to Louis.)
Will: “And with a straight face, you’re gonna tell students that America is so star-spangled awesome that we’re the only ones in the world who have freedom? Canada has freedom. Japan has freedom. The UK, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, Australia…Belgium has freedom! So…207 sovereign states in the world…like 180 of ‘em have freedom.”
Professor: “Alright…”
(Will turns to Jenny.)
Will: “And, yeah, you…sorority girl. Just in case you wander into a voting booth one day, there are some things you should know. One of ‘em is there’s absolutely no evidence to support the statement that we’re the greatest country in the world. We’re 7th in literacy, 27th in math, 22nd in science, 49th in life expectancy, 178th in infant mortality, 3rd in median household income, number 4 in labor force and number 4 in exports. We lead the world in only three categories: number of incarcerated citizens per capita, number of adults who believe angels are real and defense spending, where we spend more than the next 26 countries combined, 25 of whom are allies. Now, none of this is the fault of a 20-year-old college student, but you, nonetheless, are, without a doubt, a member of the worst period generation period ever period, so when you ask what makes us the greatest country in the world, I don’t know what the **** you’re talking about! Yosemite?!”
(Silence.)
Will: “It sure used to be. We stood up for what was right. We fought for moral reason. We passed laws, struck down laws, for moral reason. We waged wars on poverty, not on poor people. We sacrificed, we cared about our neighbors, we put our money where our mouths were and we never beat our chest. We built great, big things, made ungodly technological advances, explored the universe, cured diseases and we cultivated the world’s greatest artists AND the world’s greatest economy. We reached for the stars, acted like men. We aspired to intelligence, we didn’t belittle it. It didn’t make us feel inferior. We didn’t identify ourselves by who we voted for in the last election and we didn’t scare so easy. We were able to be all these things and do all these things because we were informed…by great men, men who were revered. First step in solving any problem is recognizing there is one. America is not the greatest country in the world anymore. “
it may be a work of fiction but it's spot on. If I were there when he said it I'd have probably stood up and applauded.
Many people in the US think they're morally superior, but 60% of people living there have never left the USA. 15% have never even left the state they live in. if your sole opinion of the rest of the world is provided by TV news that's so opinionated or so far to the left or right they'd be in outer space if the world was flat, then, IMO, you can't be superior in any way, never mind morally.
it may be a work of fiction but it's spot on. If I were there when he said it I'd have probably stood up and applauded.
Many people in the US think they're morally superior, but 60% of people living there have never left the USA. 15% have never even left the state they live in. if your sole opinion of the rest of the world is provided by TV news that's so opinionated or so far to the left or right they'd be in outer space if the world was flat, then, IMO, you can't be superior in any way, never mind morally.
Ha ha ha ha ha
No universal healthcare
overpriced education system
No welfare system at all.
A lot of crime.
Massive wealth inequality.
Sounds like a great place to live.
Ha ha ha ha ha
No universal healthcare
overpriced education system
No welfare system at all.
A lot of crime.
Massive wealth inequality.
Sounds like a great place to live.
Subjective, I've noticed just as much snobbery from Americans as British people.To be fair I'm not at all certain about the UK having better education.
I prefer attitudes in the US sometimes.. I'll explain:
Someone works in a shop or a coffee shop or in a cafe.
Here I often find someone in that position are derided.
In the US its "good for you" for going out an earning a living, however hard it might be.
Saying "have a nice day" with no real care about if you live or die isn't polite (in my opinion).Americans are generally more polite too.
Yes, but it's worse in America.Yeah there is a wealth divide, but news flash: that exists everywhere.
Are you serious?.The recent increase in support for service personnel here is only an echo of how the US public have been treating theirs for years.
I don't even agree they are positive traits.They are also more patriotic and proud
Sometimes it's justified, sometimes it isn't - but pretending everything is fine isn't a quality to be revered either.compare that with the constant moaning we have here.
Not all cultures are equal.There are good and bad points about every country and society, the US is no different.
They are world leaders in everything, from art to science.
America often strikes me as being morally bankrupt in a number of areas. A failing experiment.
I see it apparently giving up on big chunks of it's population, I see it drifting towards it's own extra stupid home made brand of fascism, I see it justifying ever worsening things with the GWOT (most recent thing I read was a legal justification for domestic drone strikes from inside Barry's government) and veering further and further from a lot of it's supposed ideals. I really wonder what people think is so great about it.
For about five minutes I think they had the right idea. Big prosperous middle class. Widespread opportunity. Now? Not really.
You seem to be mixing up the actions of the government over the will of the population.Based on what some of the more left-leaning members of these forums post, the UK's leadership is no less guilty of giving up on certain chunks of the populace. Meanwhile, the EDL and BNP are no less bigoted and small minded than their American counterparts. Oh, and let's not forget we never actually turned around and told America we'd have no part in this GWOT.
So, why is America a failed experiment again? And if they are, what does that make us - the once great superpower that ruled with an iron fist and has become a bit of a joke on the global stage, reminiscing over the days where the sun never set? Do me a favour.
You seem to be mixing up the actions of the government over the will of the population.
For example, the war on Iraq had support in the USA - it didn't here.
Our political class are almost as bad, only almost - as at least we are beyond debating evolution & secularism (two massive points of political contention over there).
The USA has been hijacked by a select number of institutions which you can see clearly by the policies.
1. The church.
2. The finance industry.
3. The military.
4. The oil Industry.
5. The gun lobby.
Having a nation structured to bend to the will of fringe interests groups will always end up backwards (the same applies in much of the middle east but with the church playing a bigger role).
Obviously it's nothing to do with the actual religions this, just the institutions.
You seemed to have selectively ignored the evolution & secularism points.I'm mistaking nothing. I don't recall Labour being ejected from office in 2005 following the invasion of Iraq? Given that there was no referendum on the war, the chance for the people to exercise their will was in the polling booths.
There was support and protest in both the US and UK, so I'm not really sure how you can insinuate that we're somehow absolved of any guilt in this. Nevermind the fact that opposition for the war for some reason seemed to be less prevalent following July 2005.
It's amazing how quiet many of the anti-war lobby go when it's their community getting bombed to ****. But I digress.
Again, governments/institutions not the population - most the UK don't really care about gay marriage or female bishops one way or the other (unlike the US).Did you miss the ongoing arguments over gay marriage, female bishops, etc? What about the taxpayer funded bailout of Northern Rock and RBS? What about the fact that the financial institutions are continuing to take the mick?
Our problems may not be exactly the same, but it's the same crap, just in a different dialect.