I believe Baddass still owns a 2405FPW? That speaks volumes. . .
i certainly do


How do these colour calibration tools work? I've seena few monitors which can compete with the Dell 2408 once calibrated.
[edit]
Which tool is better, would you say? The Sypder 3(Pro/Elite) or the LaCie BlueEye?
they help you adjust the monitor OSD settings to a good level, and then carry out a software level adjustment to adjust your graphics card LUT and then create an ICC profile. Have a look at the reviews of leading colorimeters here which should help: http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews.htm

Sallermas, sorry for double posting, but in case my question drops to the bottom of the forum abyss, which of the calibration tools would you recommend? I mean, if you get a Spyder 3 Pro, would the calibration be any less accurate that the Elite, or does the Elite just have extra bells and whistles that you might not use? Also, the LaCie BlueEye is what's used for the reviews on TFT central. I've never really used any of these magic boxes before, and would appreciate any info anyone had
The Spyder3 packages feature the same hardware device, just different software packages. calibration results should be the same really in terms of accuracy, but the features, options and reporting functions will vary. The LaCie Blue Eye package is a different hardware tool, and features all the top end reportuing graphs you see in the reviews there (dE, gamut etc). If you want a cheaper version, the X-rite i1 display 2 is the same hardware, but different software. it still gives excellent results, but you wont get the reporting features that LaCie's package offers. depends if you really need those though
The problem you are seeing is the "wide-gamut" snake oil. The reason your 2405 looked better is that it had the standard 72% NTSC gamut. The Dell 2408 has way overcooked colours out-of-the-box as it can physically display a wider-range of reds and greens. This means that bar calibrating in the factory (and adding £££ to the cost, ignoring the fact that you should recalibrate often) you're stuck with getting a colorimeter to sort out the mess you've been landed in.
This is why I don't believe that high-gamut monitors have a place in the mid-range line-ups, it's just being forced on us because it's a bigger number in the spec box when comparing against another monitor.
I agree. Once calibrated they can be good, but without, they can add problems to most normal users.
I do need this monitor for web/graphic design, as well as gaming obv. That's why I wondered if calibration would help, because it really seems to in the TFT Central reviews. However, I've had this nagging in the back of my head if going to all this effort for web-based design is worth it, because even though I may have a nigh accurate display after all this, 99.99% of people out there don't. So it may just all have gone to waste.
i'd disagree with that reallly. while there are a fair few reports of issues with the 2408WFP, it is only effecting a small number really in the larger picture.....there are bound to be many many more perfectly happy customers. there's even fewer reports than there was with the 2407WFP-HC black ghosting issue really.