Post details!![]()
Up 20KG

I've got some photo's of the chart read outs. Unfortunatley the hamstring sensor was being temprimental and giving minimal readouts. He's found that sometimes peoples hamstring recruitment has been greater than their quad!
On my 170KG attempt quad recruitment maxed out and went off the chart at over 1000hertz (hertz I think it is). I'll post the pics up later this afternoon. Was quite kool walking around with a laptop and watching the readout jump every step I took.
I have a 'low insertion' on my quad apparently which is why it's quite pronounced over my knee. I now have a bald patch on my Hamstring, Vastus Medialis, and knee cap where I had to shave it for the sensors.

Edit:
I would have preferred to get a reading from the glute as opposed to the hamstring but it's his dissertation and I don't think he fancied sticking a sensor onto my ass.


I'm not entirely sure what means what in the graphs but you can see each lift. I think it went something like 110KG, 130KG, 160KG, 170KG. I gave the 160 a bit more explosive movement on the concentric which shows on the chart. The 4th set & PB rep I told him not to spot me as I usually pause/stall for a while, he then didn't tell me when I was parralell so there was a slight pause and not quite such an explosive effort which you can just about see.
As you can see the hamstring readout (red line) was more or less nil due to a dodgey sensor.


Next week is going to be 3 sets of 10 reps at 50-60% with super slow 8-10 second negatives. I'll get him to send me the comparison chart so people can see. I'll also try and get the title of his dissertation too so this actually makes sense!
One thing he mentioned was that although the bar on the smith only weighs 7.5KG you have the resistance from the bearings and the runners to take into account. A quick bit of overhead press with the olympic bar and then smith proved the resistance to be very similar. This would add another 12.5KG's to the lift however for now 170KG is fine for me!
Last edited: