42 goals out off 43 games. If thats not the best what is?
Should check out Eto'o's scoring record at Barca(and before) he put in several seasons with a very similar goals to games ratio, infact Eto'o has pretty much had what, 8 years with either the best, or equalling the best goals to game ratio of anyone in the world.
If goal scoring is the yardstick, Eto'o beats EVERYONE hands down as he did it year in year out. Only injuries and extreme hatred with Ronaldinho really kept his games per season to a lower level than would be required to boast about 50goals a season. Phenomenal player whose done it for years on end though and Messi's got some way to go. THe problem is when a team is built around a single player for so long, and that team is the best in the world, their stats aren't that comparable.
Stick any player, good or bad, in the best team in the world and their form will increase and they'll get more goals and have better performances. Would Messi have scored 42, at Bolton in 43 performances? Would he at Liverpool even, would he in any league that wasn't as open as La Liga, unlikely.
Even though he trashed us, and scored 4, it was a good performance but we didn't make it hard, he was up against Sagna and Silvestre who were pretty useless, Vermaelen who was isolated with poop around him and CLichy who was the only one who actually looked like he wanted to win so was pressuring all over the pitch. When Clichy ran out of defence and won the ball in Theo's area of the pitch I was cracking up. The chip was one on one with the keeper, Vela's done that before, he could have gone around him or done anything, easy, the badly cleared cross that dropped for him, easy, the SIlvestre assist, not easy but rather fell for him. The last one was poor defending but a nice run and stuck with it after the ball bounced around.
It wasn't the 4 best goals ever.
I was honestly thinking the other day, that his growth therapy treatments border on the, well, dodgey. Would it have been acceptable if JT decided he would be better as a 6'8 defender, so took growth hormone all through his teens, no he'd be widely blasted. But its a hard call because no one wants a kid to be a midget and unhappy. THing is he's massively built, huge neck, insane strength for a little guy and a lot of that has to be down to basically doping in his growing years.
Would he be anywhere near as good without the growth hormone, as strong, as fast, as agile?