Deleted member 651465
Deleted member 651465
Yes, but they can also attempt to rope in "the others", probably not easy to do.
Didn't realise they could rope in more than 1 party?
Yes, but they can also attempt to rope in "the others", probably not easy to do.
But they can't keep us in dreamworld for another 5 years, the markets will crumble under the debt![]()
I do however agree that the public are idiots and won't for one second consider who got us into this mess when voting in the future.
A summary:
1) I know nothing about Australian politics but will continue arguing because otherwise I would have to admit I was wrong. While I say I do that, in reality I hate doing it so won't. Instead I will nit pick and try and score points and make my self look worse with every word.
You're in your own little world.A summary:
1) I say 'PR causes hung parliaments'
2) Australian bloke says 'no it doesn't, check out Australia'
3) I say 'that's anecdotal evidence'
4) You say .. 'er .. no it isn't Britboy you are stupid and WRONG it's fact .. Check out these facts
5) Lots of people say 'er .. your facts look riddled with hung parliaments!'
6) I spend 2 hours explaining what 'anecdotal evidence' actually is to you and what it means
7) You say 'Well .. er .. er .. PR DOES cause hung parliaments, obviously. Coalitions are cool by the way (!!)'
8) We all lol and move on. Thanks for playing.
You're in your own little world.
As you clearly don't want to read the links I've provided, please follow RDMs advice, and read the appropriate information that Evanglion kindly provided.
They can.Didn't realise they could rope in more than 1 party?
Keep on trollin'! In the interests of the thread, we can teach you about coalition governments in another thread. Good luck!This could have all been avoided if you'd looked up 'anecdotal evidence' earlier!
As for coalition governments being strong, by very definition they're compromise. Difference sides in the coalition compromise as to what they get. That's not 'strong' by any definition of the word COMPARED TO MAJORITY GOVERNMENTS WHO CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT.
Don't trust me though, ask someone you do trust that is nearby ..
I accept your silent apology
Keep on trollin'!
So? Coalition government has been proven to be successful in many parliaments, including some of the strongest economies in the world: the Nordic countries, Benelux, Austria, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Switzerland, Japan, Turkey, Israel, New Zealand, Kosovo, Pakistan, Kenya, and India.
Germany has had up to four parties in a coalition (since 1949).Didn't realise they could rope in more than 1 party?
Oh, sorry if it seemed a tad argumentative, riled up by other things.I totally agree and I'm not arguing that. Point is PR produces more coalition governments. Fact. 64% in Europe since the war have being coalitions.
A bad thing? No. As you say, some of the best countries/governments have being coalitions. It's just we're not used to it over here.
To me I think it's a good idea. Less chance of bad/extreme laws getting passed as politicians have to actually discuss/agree on things.
Done.Slamm62 said:Stop argueing
You haven't understood the conversation. You can't apply the thought to this one election alone. This will be a permanent change to how elections are done in this country.
I said that I thought this was the best possible outcome before the election and I still agree.It pains me to say it but think at this stage I'd take a Lib/Con coalition with Vince Cable as Chancellor.
Oh, sorry if it seemed a tad argumentative, riled up by other things.
We're not used to it, but there's only one way to get used too it.
I still hope The Tories form a coalition with the Libdems. Would be the best combo imo.