Is it really only 200ft, would have thought you would off needed more for parachute.
RIP

It's not going to be a soft landing but I imagine 200ft is sufficient to scrub off enough of the effect gravity wants to have on you? I doubt you can get to terminal velocity within that distance so it's not comparable to a sky dive requirement.
Is there any additional weight added to this set-up, rather than a normal parachute set-up? part of the seat ?
Excuse my lack of knowledge in this area
The mass will not increase acceleration but does decrease time of flight as it reaches a higher terminal velocity (more drag from greater speed required to counteract the increase gravitational force on a more massive object)....or something like that.....I think. Whether any of this plays a role at 200ft and down is another question? Physics is not my strong point 
Pretty sure the seat comes out with you attached to it + parachute(s).
The physics hurts my head and I've been up far too longThe mass will not increase acceleration but does decrease time of flight as it reaches a higher terminal velocity (more drag from greater speed required to counteract the increase gravitational force on a more massive object)....or something like that.....I think. Physics is not my strong point
![]()
Not time spent in the air, but the force with which it impacts the ground, surely?

)Impressive. File that under brave but stupid.
K
He could have pointed it east or north west then ejected. The reason was blatantly so as not to scrap millions of pounds of aircraft, even though it surely ended up being a write off anyway.
That's great, I'm glad we could have a sensible discussion on the matter.
![]()