Why do I think he's personally attacking me, because he makes a habit of it and lately a LOT of members have decided to respond to a lot of my posts with a generic "You're wrong because I say so, you always just post to have a go at Arsenal" post, over and over. Look at Weebull's response.
As for why the Arsenal team should see it if the dutch Fa don't, firstly and quite simply, one doctor misdiagnosing something doesn't excuse another doctor also misdiagnosing it. Secondly, time very very simply, its incredibly common to rest as much as possible and take another scan, not all but a huge number of injuries involve immediate swelling which frequently makes scans less accurate. Rescanning as the swelling goes down is incredibly common and often gives a much clearer picture.
As a doctor, with your really only top class striker(and with several other strikers injured at that point) I wouldn't rely on either one opinion, first opinion or the initial scans taken, its that simple. Fly out and see the player before sending them to a quack.
Well I'm not saying your wrong, but you don't exactly post much positive about Arsenal, but then again I suppose your entitled to criticise and be interested in the club you support.
As for the whole blaming the Arsenal doctor for not forming a second opinion on the scan and seeing him in person he could well have seen the exact same results, for all we know (unless you're a doctor or something) seeing him in person wouldn't have changed very much and the results he had were as good as they would get. Not saying there is no blame at all on them but to weight it heavily on them is pretty harsh.
Also what is a quack? Some sort of dodgy doctor because of this horse placenta stuff? I think I remember it doing wonders for Benayoun in his last season for us, could be wrong.