Of course they would they send them whereever the threats are. It's what they do.
Of course they would they send them whereever the threats are. It's what they do.
Sigh. I was referring to your post which read like you were saying Jong Un is trying to make it seem like he's in charge whereas Il wasn't. You're supposed to be clever enough to discern sarcasm :/
Never mind.
You're the kind of poster who only reads things the way they want to in context or otherwise.
Why would they send carriers when they have air bases in SK?
They should just nuke NK and be done with it. For the greater good.
When there is nothing better nearby, yea. But half of Japan is covered by US forces, there's this huge treaty on it.
I read your post with an open mind and thought that was the context you were going for because that's the way you post all over the forum. I replied in that context, not because I wanted to only see it like that but because of the way you post all over here.
Your attitude here kind of confirms that.
1) Aegis
2) Marines
3) Cause they can
4) It keep Halliburton happy
need I go on.