Poll: Syrian Chemical Weapon Attack

Would you support a military strike on Syria without a UN Security Council resolution?


  • Total voters
    828
  • Poll closed .
Part of me thinks people are giving Assad too much credit - another part wonders if he has complete control over his military - I.e. is it possible the weapons were used without the government's request.

I agree it's hard to trust anyone, even when or if supposed evidence is presented.
 
Sometimes I sit and wonder if GD is where all of the conspiracy theorists on the internet gather and share their drug and alcohol fueled nut job scenarios.

There are a lot of crackpot conspiracy theories out there but there's also being completely naive on the other end.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'état

The 1953 Iranian coup d'état, known in Iran as the 28 Mordad coup, was the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Iran, and its head of government Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh on 19 August 1953, orchestrated by the United Kingdom (under the name 'Operation Boot') and the United States (under the name TPAJAX Project).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

Operation Northwoods was a series of false flag proposals that originated within the United States government in 1962, but were rejected by the Kennedy administration. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit perceived acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation.

They've done it plenty of times before.
 
So..........

Chemicals have been used 100% definately?
No one knows who is responsible?
The UN are testing and gathering intel?
The americans say they know for sure it was the government not the rebels?
Russia and china will help the syrian government?
America are ready to push the button and expect the UK to do what?
 
haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa hahahah you Fools...

have you forgotten what The devil "Henry Kissinger" said back in the 60s:

"We must initiate a war every ten years in the Middle east in order to suck the 10s of billions of $ worth of resources "

1980 = Iraq vs Iran
1991 = Iraq vs West
2003 = Iraq+Afghanstan vs west

2013+ = WWIII?


most of you are ignorant fools and blind who believe the British, USA, France, Germany...etc western governments are there to bring peace and better life style to the world.

So..........

Chemicals have been used 100% definately?
No one knows who is responsible?
The UN are testing and gathering intel?
The americans say they know for sure it was the government not the rebels?
Russia and china will help the syrian government?
America are ready to push the button and expect the UK to do what?

yes it has been used and confirmed by the Syrian govs, but their army have not used any sort of weapon. the FSA used those chemical shells on people and made it to look like the Syrian army did it. Those shells were provide by western govs to the FSA via the Turkish gov.
 
Last edited:
I guess we'll have to wait and see when the report is finished but you'll probably find communications intercepts etc... and a fair bit of other evidence for the Syrian Army to be behind this as opposed to any rebel groups. I doubt very much Obama is going to launch an attack on the mere chance it was Syrian govt forces behind this rather than a rebel group.

Tbh... we should have intervened earlier - 100,000 people dying via conventional weapons should be an event way over any red line... without even considering another few hundred - thousand more from a chemical attack.
 
I'm not voting any more, I'm completely disillusioned with any politician or political party.

I preferred the cold war. Russians were an easy threat to project. This terrorist, Regime WMD, gas crap is too complicated.....
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...ow-hes-fighting-on-alqaidas-side-8786680.html

Does Obama know he’s fighting on al-Qa’ida’s side?

If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has ensured – for the very first time in history – that the United States will be on the same side as al-Qa’ida.

The Western powers backed themselves into a corner when they said using chemical weapons was a 'red line'. Now if they do nothing they look weak and foolish, and if they do act they just look foolish.
 
Last edited:
At the risk of being overly alarmist - this strikes me as a pretty good prelude to another world war... bags not being involved. Send the politicians to do the fighting...
 
At the risk of being overly alarmist - this strikes me as a pretty good prelude to another world war... bags not being involved. Send the politicians to do the fighting...

Agreed - lets see how quickly they send their own sons and daughters to get slaughtered instead of the sheeple.....

Politicians are just plain simple liars - BUT until we start to hold them to account properly - they'll just carry on....... wake up people!
 
The majority of Americans and Brits don't want intervention - government does it anyway. Iraq anyone? Cameron wants popularity for the next election? Is the dodgy dossier being prepared as we speak?
 
Tbh... we should have intervened earlier - 100,000 people dying via conventional weapons should be an event way over any red line... without even considering another few hundred - thousand more from a chemical attack.

On that basis we should go back into Afghan/Iraq, overthrow our puppet governments, and put the rebels (now the Taliban/Baath party) back in power :P

People dying via legal weapons in a civil war shouldn't be grounds for the world police to destroy the country, if we let them sort it out they will be better for it.


http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...ow-hes-fighting-on-alqaidas-side-8786680.html

Does Obama know he’s fighting on al-Qa’ida’s side?

If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has ensured – for the very first time in history – that the United States will be on the same side as al-Qa’ida.

Compleatly glossing over the USA's supply of money/arms/training to al-Qa'ida during the cold war when they were fighting the USSR :P
 
Last edited:
On that basis we should go back into Afghan/Iraq, overthrow our puppet governments, and put the rebels (now the Taliban/Baath party) back in power :P

People dying via legal weapons in a civil war shouldn't be grounds for the world police to destroy the country, if we let them sort it out they will be better for it.

And we should go into North Korea, but oh wait we don't, because they have nukes.
 
"We know they have both the motive and the opportunity whereas the opposition does not have those things and the opposition's chance of having used chemical weapons in our view is vanishingly small."
So western ally turkey lied when they said they recovered sarin gas from an al nusra hideout ? :rolleyes: and ofcourse a group labeled as terrorists by multiple countries around the world who do suicide bombings wouldn't use chemical weapons :rolleyes:

hopefully cameron and his family will be the first people to taske up arms and get over there

how come non of our western media sites are refrencing the turkey sarin gas finds , explaining al nusra ARE the real opposition and how they are terrorists committing atrocities on a daily basis ? and calling out our politicians as lieing sacks of ****

our journalists are like sheep desperate for a war because they will get more overtime and nice bonuses for going to report on a war.

RT video but if you google you can find articles about it on more western news websites

heres one in a turkish news website
http://www.radikal.com.tr/turkiye/adanada_el_nusra_operasyonu_2_kilo_sarin_gazi_bulundu-1135579
obviously in turkish
Just to prove RT aren't making it up
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom