Chances of UKIP winning General Election?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pretty much all of this is completely wrong. I don't know where to start.

Translated as, I don't have an actual argument so I'll make a dismissive statement which makes me look clever and as if I do.

I'm making a simple point, paedophiles are attracted to children regardless of the person. Gay people are attracted to people who happen to be of the same sex but aren't attracted to everyone of the same sex. That is why they are not comparable.

So if you don't know where to start when all I've made is one point I'm guessing your rebuttal isn't very strong.

Either you think paedophiles are attracted to the person and they would happily turn down other children because they don't 'fancy them', or you think gay people are just sexual deviants who just want anyone of the same sex they can get their hands on..so which is it?
 
Is Bitslice the resident Muslim basher?

....Oh, yep, yes he is.

That's odd because I've been mostly talking about Scientologists?


But if you mean my other posts regarding the 0.000000001% of muslims who follow a more radical version of Islam, then yes I guess :confused:
If you'd like to debate any of them then feel free, that's what they are there for.

If you think I'm "bashing" all the other muslims then you must be some kind of moron?



Have you got any other idiotic/absurd observations?

I really can't stand cry-baby posts like this, in debate threads you debate, you don't run around like a little girl and make daft slurs. Lots of other people manage to point out the flaws in my posts or make a better argument - just grow up FFS.


/
 
Last edited:
Well I was just reading through some of your other sensationalist tripe that you have posted on here. So yes, grow up indeed.
 
If you think I'm "bashing" all the other muslims then you must be some kind of moron?

Have you got any other idiotic/absurd observations?

I really can't stand cry-baby posts like this, in debate threads you debate, you don't run around like a little girl and make daft slurs.

You lead with a couple of daft slurs before denouncing someone else for making daft slurs? Alanis Morissette would have something to say about that, I suspect.
 
I do. I thought the irony of using a non-ironic song by Morissette which was designed to be ironic itself was self evident. Perhaps not to everyone.

e: Actually, his hypocrisy is ironic so I guess it works that way too.
 
Last edited:
[FnG]magnolia;26441498 said:
You lead with a couple of daft slurs before denouncing someone else for making daft slurs? Alanis Morissette would have something to say about that, I suspect.
Interestingly you do exactly the same thing, you rarely address the point being made, you just make some wry observation about the OP.

Non specific irritation is different from his direct character assassination.
It's the difference between calling someone a moron or a paedophile, one is generic abuse, the other is presented without supporting evidence as a knowing slur.
This is why I expect people to debate specific points so I can reply properly to them, it's polite if nothing else.

Sometimes I wonder if you habitually avoid giving a straight opinion so you can avoid such conversations?


edit:
Oh look, your other habit, running away... :rolleyes:

Well I was just reading through some of your other sensationalist tripe that you have posted on here. So yes, grow up indeed.
I'm glad you can read, now stop being so wet and try debating, perhaps not in this thread as it would go off topic.
I suggest you try reading Elmarko's posts as an example on how to do it.

If you can avoid following me around just to make cheap shots, that would be cool too :)


/
 
Last edited:
Don't get too excited,I was merely interested to see if I recognised you from past threads, and I was right I do. I don't think we can debate very much when your stance is "islam is Christianitys stupid brother" or words to that effect.
 
Don't get too excited,I was merely interested to see if I recognised you from past threads, and I was right I do. I don't think we can debate very much when your stance is "islam is Christianitys stupid brother" or words to that effect.

Borrowing a post:
"Translated as, I don't have an actual argument so I'll make a dismissive statement which makes me look clever and as if I do."


You had me worried there, I thought I'd missed an apostrophe off :eek: :(

"Pretending Islam is anything other than Christianity's idiot brother is pointless."

Thankfully I hadn't :)

And looking back you did at the time respond to it, we just appeared to have disagreed on the value of RS


I was quite pleased with that phrase actually :confused:
It's quite succinct is summing up exactly what is wrong with Islam. It's like Christianity just with all the stupid Old Testament bits left in.
 
Last edited:
^^ What has that got to do with me???
Nothing, I was using your nice phase because it would have been a great response to CP

I'll edit it, it's confusing... :(

[FnG]magnolia;26441896 said:
He's on a roll, let him be.

Sigh, it's so annoying that you don't take part.
Why do you bother posting here? You could just look in the mirror and smirk, it would be the same thing...


/
 
Last edited:
Yep I get that you've found something on the internet and you want to tell everyone about it,
this doesn't answer the point raised though.

It does answer it. The world doesn't revolve around your sweet little head. Whether you think there is a justification for you discriminating against people based on their religion is irrelevant. It is against the law.

edit : I do think this thread has gone slightly off topic. If a Don had the time and inclination splitting the discussion onto a thread of its own might be an idea...
 
Last edited:
It does answer it. The world doesn't revolve around your sweet little head. Whether you think there is a justification for you discriminating against people based on their religion is irrelevant. It is against the law.

I was referring to that awkward wheatons law that you were so keen to mention :o

And what is against the real law is incitement, something I've no intention of doing. There is a difference between pointing out someone's religion or culture are backward and wanting a mob to throw buns at them.

Religion isn't a "do what I like because sky pixie" excuse.
If someone's interpretation of religion is to kill women, then I'm going to say to that person, "you suck"

What would be incitement is to say that all followers of that religion have the same interpretation of their religion and like to kill women, which clearly they don't.

I'm not quite sure how that applies to Scientology as they all appear to be equally brainwashed and intent on corrupting others, but honestly I don't give a fig if someone wants to chuck them into a volcano and arrest me for suggesting it. Totally worth it.
 
Last edited:
People don't become, say Christians because they feel like being nice to each other, they believe in a God and what that God said.
Describing a religion in those terms isn't teaching the concept of religion, you could be talking about the WI

The putative underlying message of Christianity and Islam is to be nice to each other and charitable to those less fortunate.

Good to see you back, btw. What have you been up to for two months ? :)
 
The putative underlying message of Christianity and Islam is to be nice to each other and charitable to those less fortunate.
Yup, but they do that because they have a love of God, so RS really has to explain that concept of spirtually first, otherwise being nice makes so sense.

Technically Jesus could have said eat cheese and play Xbox, but fear/love god, and the religion would be much the same.
Good to see you back, btw. What have you been up to for two months ? :)
I'm guessing Cratorloads endless butthurt RTMing eventually found a mod who misinterpreted what I post? God knows what goes on in here sometimes :( I'll just have to spell everything out in future.

I did have a nice time learning about FPGA's and stuff, so a good thing for me :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom