Apollo45

if we were able to get to the moon 45 years ago then why has no people have left earth orbit on NASA missions since? it makes no sense.

Anyone who has played kerbal knows it has no logic

Because it depletes our resources for little or no gain. USA needs to start more wars and take over the world before NASA can get free oil for fannying about on the moon. ;)
 
Last edited:
Because it depletes our resources for little or no gain. USA needs to start more wars and take over the world before NASA can get free oil for fannying about on the moon. ;)

The scientific gain is worth it we can't sit on this rock forever.

all the private space companies are going to hopefully give nasa a nudge and make them do something worth while instead of spending billions of dollars circling the earth

Didn't you notice his trolling. It was obvious even more so after he mentioned tilting.
There once was a thread about some ufo expert who claimed it was fake because the ufo wasn't on a tilt and he could tell by the pixels
 
It's the senate that cause the issue, nasa is forced to build what the senate say. It's got to use x engines, solid boosters etc as that's what companies sponsor the senate. Even though the SLS isn't what nasa wants to build.

SpaceX will have to syphon money from NASA and do it themselves. Hopefully ULA will respond they will have to or close down their space launch department. They can't compete with spaceX as it is. Let alone when SpaceX really get going.

Iss has been good for long duration space though. We are very good at minimizing bone and muscle loss now.
 
Last edited:
So why wouldn't buzz swear on the bible that he had been on the moon?
instead he refuses and attempts to assassinate the guy

The idiot was annoying Buzz, getting in his face, and then proceeded to call him a coward & a liar.
Pretty good right hook too if you ask me.
 
So why wouldn't buzz swear on the bible that he had been on the moon?
instead he refuses and attempts to assassinate the guy

i wouldn't swear on the bible either as it means nothing, the reason NASA didnt go back to the moon was funding.
I feel this will happen again once we get man on Mars, they simply will not believe it.
 
arknor, you're just trolling this thread, please take this as a warning to desist.
 
'You're a coward, a liar and a thief'

Considering he was hassling him i'd say he deserved a bit of a slap.
 
oh man justice has never been served better, that idiot deserved that punch and some more, what an idiot:mad:

Aye, I guess at some point everyone loses patience with fruit loops, nuts and CT's, and I suspect Mr Aldrin probably got fed up of them, combined with having a camera poked in his face and lost his temper a bit.

Of course even if he had sworn on the bible (what does that prove though, given the Bible doesn't mean much to over half the worlds population, and even Christians have been known to lie on oath), it wouldn't be enough for the CT's.

There are some who don't believe the footage from the more recent moon probes that have taken shots of the landing sites, because, of course, they're faked as well.


Personally I think in many ways we've gone backwards over the last 45 years.
We haven't sent anyone higher than the Space Station, we've even lost our reusable manned space vehicle (although we may be getting a new one in the next 10 years or so*), and it seems that the idiots who don't understand, or even worse don't believe in science are gaining the upper ground.


*I won't count the Virgin One craft as one, because it's not really going far into space proper.
 
Back
Top Bottom