Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
So a blast from the past, who remembers these:
![]()
AMD had something like ten world wide, I got one and I still have it on my desk some ten years later.
Was there last truly great processor!
thanks, that could also be very exciting as the cost of the M cores are silly. Although i am a fan of the M core for light tasks.
So this is taken from DinoPC. 1700 vs 7700k (stock and Overclocked).
They tested GTAV.
Average is pretty similar across the board. They didn't get a chance to overclock the 1700 though.
Every e-tailer I've seen has exactly the same prices so I wouldn't expect them to budge.Gibbo said these prices are MSRP so no gouging. I cannot see them changing unless the exchange rate does, and then not for a while as they wee purchased now.
Not entirely surprised by those GTA V results, especially against a 5GHz 7700K. We know Kabylake is slightly stronger clock for clock, and then its running substantially higher clocks as well.
Will be interesting when we start to get the tweaked, OC'd results and a wider range of games.
Min is a worry. It was the noticeable minimums on GTAV which made me replace my 8320.So this is taken from DinoPC. 1700 vs 7700k (stock and Overclocked).
They tested GTAV.
![]()
Average is pretty similar across the board. They didn't get a chance to overclock the 1700 though.
Too be honest it made me consider the i7 7700k over this processor....
Mins are bad, hopefully that is just an anomoly in that specific game, cause no amount of overclocking is going to catch that up.
Kinda what I'd expect - almost no difference in average frame rates when GPU limited but the higher clocked i7-7700K would get better minimums and maximums. The only oddity for me is that I thought GTA V in particular loved extra cores, yet it doesn't seem as if the R7 1700's extra cores are helping much here.So this is taken from DinoPC. 1700 vs 7700k (stock and Overclocked).
They tested GTAV.
![]()
Average is pretty similar across the board. They didn't get a chance to overclock the 1700 though.
That wasn't what the hype was leading us to believe...
It's 2ghz down compared to the 7700kKinda what I'd expect - almost no difference in average frame rates when GPU limited but the higher clocked i7-7700K would get better minimums and maximums. The only oddity for me is that I thought GTA V in particular loved extra cores, yet it doesn't seem as if the R7 1700's extra cores are helping much here.
AMD have had to keep things very hush on Zen, Intel are a giant and can make a come back, but a giant needs time and AMD have done such a good job at keeping this under wraps that any retaliation from Intel will take time and like AMD say, its just the start, I sure for one welcome the good old days back where AMD were around 50% processor market share and more in the gaming arena.![]()
I understand gibbo,
Anyways i want to buy a 1700 and what motherboard would you recommend (cheapest as possible) as well as the cpu cooler, will stock cooler do it any justice in keeping it cool enough at 4ghz?