London Bridge Incident

People are focusing on mosques, in some cases rightly so, but weve had hate preachers on the streets and the police have never done anything about it in the past. Very much doubt these three would have been a member of any mosque, most who are, would have been getting ready after the feast to pray the night prayers! Rooting these animals out is going to need some serious undercover resource
 
So one of these guys was on TV with ISIS flags, reported to the authorities multiple times, and yet still was left to do this.

Surely anyone doing these things needs to be rounded up and sent... somewhere? Locked away? Anything, surely.

I know it's about managing risk, but this guy was clearly a risk and was in the public eye. Mental.
 
Dis86 said:
You're an utter buffoon if you think the accidental death of innocent people in a warzone created in the name of Islam justifies the killing of innocent people elsewhere. Infact you really need to get your head sorted as its precisely the justification these terrorists use.
Click to expand...

He didn't say it justifies it. But it's not exactly going to help is it?
 
Hiijinx said:
This.

And just to rub salt into the wound, they are also being killed with the weapons we gave them in the first place...

We need change and if that means Corbyn, he has my vote.
Click to expand...

Pretty much this.

However i do not want to see screamings of passed deeds done in dealing with the Saudi`s which will come of out it. That was then this is now.
 
Hardly accidental. Did any of those Syrians declare war on the UK, no, did any of them attack the US, no, did any of them ever want a war. No. Are they attacking other countries, no. I don't condone anyone being blown up in either country but if you don't see a US/UK lead attack on foreign soil which justified or not had killed too many innocent a reason for being very very narked off then your a massive sheeple.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
deuse said:
It may mean something to another muslim. But it means nothing to most other people. Are you going to answer me from yesterday?

"So most muslims(so you say) didn't mind that Khan had dealings with convicted terrorist Yasser al-Siri and hate preacher Abu Qatada."
Click to expand...


Tories step up attempts to link Sadiq Khan to extremists
Conservative election strategists appear increasingly sure that attempting to link Sadiq Khan to radical Muslims will win Zac Goldsmith votes in the London mayoral election on 5 May.

Minutes after David Cameron joined the attack on Wednesday by claiming Khan was close to a south London cleric, Suliman Gani, who “supports IS [Islamic State]”, Team Zac circulated a dossier alleging Khan’s links with convicted terrorists, homophobes, antisemites and hate preachers. Khan’s side dismissed it as “desperate dog-whistling”.
Click to expand...
Source = The Guardian

I think you need to stop reading crap sources fella!
 
Robbo said:
So one of these guys was on TV with ISIS flags, reported to the authorities multiple times, and yet still was left to do this.

Surely anyone doing these things needs to be rounded up and sent... somewhere? Locked away? Anything, surely.

I know it's about managing risk, but this guy was clearly a risk and was in the public eye. Mental.
Click to expand...

The trouble is they might be clearly a risk but until they take a further step I don't think they can do anything against them. The issue with that is they then go from risk to threat in no time at all
ChroniC said:
Hardly accidental. I don't think I'm the buffon here. Did any of those Syrians declare war on the UK, no, did any of them attack the US, no, did any of them ever want a war. No. I don't condone anyone being blown up in either country but if you don't see a US/UK lead attack on foreign soil which justified or not had killed too many innocent a reason for being very very narked off then your a massive sheeple.
Click to expand...
So you're suggesting the United States is intentionally targeting children?

Also ding ding ding, we have a winner! Sheeple. Lol.
 
ChroniC said:
Hardly accidental. I don't think I'm the buffon here. Did any of those Syrians declare war on the UK, no, did any of them attack the US, no, did any of them ever want a war. No. Are they attacking other countries, no. I don't condone anyone being blown up in either country but if you don't see a US/UK lead attack on foreign soil which justified or not had killed too many innocent a reason for being very very narked off then your a massive sheeple.
Click to expand...


Surely yes?

i mean given they started a civil war?
 
C.R.A.Z.Y said:
Imams refuse funeral prayers to 'indefensible' London Bridge attackers
Source = The Guardian

Is that enough condemnation for the resident Islamaphobes here ?? Or let me guess, you don't believe them or think that they are being disingenuous :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Are these the same Iman's that run mosques which sell radical material and who played host to radical preachers for decades? This is nothing more than crocodile tears.
 
Dis86 said:
The trouble is they might be clearly a risk but until they take a further step I don't think they can do anything against them. The issue with that is they then go from risk to threat in no time at all

So you're suggesting the United States is intentionally targeting children?

Also ding ding ding, we have a winner! Sheeple. Lol.
Click to expand...

Intentional no, indiscriminately, yes.
Tefal said:
Surely yes?

i mean given they started a civil war?
Click to expand...

What does civil war have to do with the US? They the worlds police now. If they have gone in an calmed the situation diplomatically then fair enough but they didn't they have been indiscrimantely blowing up areas with insurgents who also happen to be just people in houses near civilians and arming idiots. It's made the place a blood bath.There is a quote from someone or other, that for every freedom/fighter terrorist you kill, 2 more replace him. People who were never part of a cause become one as they watch their wifes and children be accidentally blown to bits.These are not trained soldiers that are going to start a war, they're people from the streets who have US made weapons.
Surely you can see had they not interveen that things would be better. Anywhere that the US has gone to help has ended up worse.
 
Last edited:
Dis86 said:
You're an utter buffoon if you think the accidental death of innocent people in a warzone created in the name of Islam justifies the killing of innocent people elsewhere. Infact you really need to get your head sorted as its precisely the justification these terrorists use.
Click to expand...
Agree, what an silly comment to make.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom