which is pointless as they tell you nothing at all. Unless like several in here you want to add meaning to them that they just don't contain.I don't have an issue with hearing what they mean... but at the moment I'm commenting on the tweets
which is pointless as they tell you nothing at all. Unless like several in here you want to add meaning to them that they just don't contain.I don't have an issue with hearing what they mean... but at the moment I'm commenting on the tweets
I don't have an issue with hearing what they mean... but at the moment I'm commenting on the tweets
which is pointless as they tell you nothing at all. Unless like several in here you want to add meaning to them that they just don't contain.
Oh so you don't have detail of a planned state intervention but have automatically assumed one idea is awful.
except you did, as everyone can see from your post, that included many things that simply were not contained in those tweets.nope, not wanting to add any further meaning to them nor do I need to in order to comment on two tweets...
except you did, as everyone can see from your post, that included many things that simply were not contained in those tweets.
like what?
Are you really trying to justify a PM's decision to campaign in "staged" public meetings, by mentioning the murder of Jo Cox by a right wing nutter?
"you don't just confiscate houses"
That is not in the tweets, that is adding your interpretation to it, that just isn't in there.
Theresa May is slammed for making 'private visit' to devastation at Grenfell Tower - while Corbyn is seen hugging survivors just an hour later
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Tower-vows-learn-lessons.html#article-4606502
I don't want to make a political thing about that situation. But the media has really turned against her. I wouldn't have even imagined the DM publishing a news story attacking her and making him appear better.
no it really isn't.yes it is, that is literally what the tweets have suggested the government do... requisition empty homes/flats
no it really isn't.
requestion does not mean confiscated, it doesn't even mean forced in all circumstances.
you're not making any sense - you're well aware of what is being discussed re: the two tweets and a suggestion by myself
now how about quoting all the uses, it is not splitting hairs at all, what you said simply can't not be ascertained by the tweet, and certainly not confiscating it."demand the use or supply of (something) by official order."
you really are trying and failing at splitting hairs here...
noun
1.
the act of requiring or demanding.
2.
a demand made.
3.
an authoritative or formal demand for something to be done, given,supplied, etc.:
The general issued a requisition to the townspeople for eight trucks.
4.
a written request or order for something, as supplies.
5.
the form on which such an order is drawn up.
6.
the state of being required for use or called into service:
to put something in requisition.
7.
a requirement or essential condition.
verb (used with object)
8.
to require or take for use; press into service.
9.
to demand or take, as by authority, for military purposes, publicneeds, etc.:
Sorry but from the way you framed it, I thought there was at least a white paper at large for solving the issue of unoccupied housing via state intervention using taxation and you were comparing that to a suggested route of direct state intervention which you feel implies forced sale/automatic state ownership.
As it turns out there seems to be no current plan/government position and very little detail beyond identification of a problem in a tweet by the leader of the opposition.
Perhaps we could agree my above statement is a little more balanced in terms of a description of the current state of play?
Sorry but from the way you framed it, I thought there was at least a white paper at large for solving the issue of unoccupied housing via state intervention using taxation and you were comparing that to a suggested route of direct state intervention which you feel implies forced sale/automatic state ownership.
As it turns out there seems to be no current plan/government position and very little detail beyond identification of a problem in a tweet by the leader of the opposition.
We have already voted on this, we voted no why do you think it will be any different now?
Someone tweets under Corbyn's official account.That's not strictly true either as Corbyn doesn't tweet, it was two labour MP's not the leader.
now how about quoting all the uses
so you ignore the other meanings and go with the one which suits your onion. Exactly what I said. So well done for rather than merely quoting it, using your own meaning and biased.you can if you like, it doesn't change much:
"the act of requiring or demanding." , "to demand or take, as by authority, for military purposes, publicneeds, etc.:" from your quote for example...
i.e. take people's homes, confiscate them, demand them etc..
which is what I commented on
so you ignore the other meanings and go with the one which suits your onion. Exactly what I said. So well done for rather than merely quoting it, using your own meaning and biased.