Yes Utd have improved. If they went further down the league after spending all that money I would be worried.
Being linked with big players isn't a sign of being ambition. Signing big players and winning or nearly winning the league is a sign of ambition. Which if you are honest, Chelski are the only one competing at the top.
Utd are having one good season in five, that isn't a great indication of proof they are back to their best.
The truly best players on the market aren't going to be looking much further than biggest teams from each league. City are that big club currently.
At Utd you will get good players because of the club but they won't sign the best any time soon. If Sanchez wants a crack at the title and play football, Chelski are the best option.
If he wants to play more and maybe a cup run, then Utd or stay with Arsenal.
Liverpool are 1 point better off than at this stage last season. Liverpool performed better than usual because we were a better side than we were in previous seasons and as I said 12 months ago, the extra games we've had to play this season will be countered out by the extra money we'll invest in our squad as a result of being in the CL.oh look Liverpool had similar amounts of rest in that season and they performed better than usual too......co-incidence, not at all.
That’s where he’s going.Real madrid after AUBAMEYANG according to sky
Mike apparently wants to go back to dortmund
Id say the deal is dead and by that i mean sanchez to utd also
That’s where he’s going.
I did call it a few pages back, Wenger will not be forced to pay a player £300k by his agent. For all of Wengers faults, I can’t fault him on that. And if Raiola thinks he can get away with scamming Arsenal...good luck to him lol
I reckon Sanchez will stay till summer then make his move to City rather than Utd.
Can’t we swap Alexis for Mikhi, then use Mikhi in a deal for Auba?
But earlier reports states Mkhitaryan does not want to move to arsenal?Reading all of the reports from those in the know, I'd be surprised if it didn't happen now. It makes sense for all involved parties, but of course Raiola won't just roll over and take an average deal. Arsenal won't have to pay £300k a week, he's not on close to that at Man Utd.
In 2009 Mkhitaryan said in a UEFA interview that his favourite team was Arsenal, so he probably wants the move. Don't forget that this was initially suggested by Raiola weeks ago, he's not stupid and he knows he can't demand the sort of money from Arsenal that he could elsewhere.
But earlier reports states Mkhitaryan does not want to move to arsenal?
Is it arsenal who want him or united trying to sweeten the deal by offering him to us?
reports as far as yesterday saying he doesnt want to come to arsenal.What reports are they?
I think it's both.
Mhiki wants more money and so does his agentreports as far as yesterday saying he doesnt want to come to arsenal.
well if arsenal want him(cant believe that as this is the first time arsenal ever mentioned him) and united dont mind offering him a part of the deal then lets go ahead and make it happen? what is the delay?
reports as far as yesterday saying he doesnt want to come to arsenal.
well if arsenal want him(cant believe that as this is the first time arsenal ever mentioned him) and united dont mind offering him a part of the deal then lets go ahead and make it happen? what is the delay?