but you would shoot him anyway, is what you're saying. you'd just take a moment to appreciate it?Personally, I think I would spend an extra second or two before I shoot him in the chest, but that's just me.
but you would shoot him anyway, is what you're saying. you'd just take a moment to appreciate it?Personally, I think I would spend an extra second or two before I shoot him in the chest, but that's just me.
Is there a source for him threatening to shoot the wife, maybe one that isn't the wife of the deceased? Is there also a source for him escalating the argument very quickly to the point the wife was scared, again one that isn't the wife of the deceased? I commend him for challenging people on parking in disabled bays, it's what a responsible citizen should do. We'd be able to do that in the UK if we didn't have to worry about being stabbed (not so much up North to fair).
Carrying a gun is legal in the US, if you carry a gun you should be trained, able and willing to use it if you feel threatened or are attacked, otherwise why carry one?
If that scene had played out in the UK the guy on the floor would have called the police and been done with it. No one would get hurt 99 times out of 100.
Well given the other guys history that probbaly would have ended with him getting a kicking and his phone smashed while he tried to call the cops.
I dont think the coke dealing criminal would have calmly stood there waiting while he called the cops do you?
I’m not sure using the dead guys background, which as far as I’ve seen wasn’t known to the shooter, as justification for his actions is legitimate.
“Your honour I know it was a bit murdery and all that, but turns out he wasn’t a nice man, so innocent then?”
Ok purely on the video content.
I doubt somoen who violently attacks somone before even saying a word will calmly wait while they fail the police and will instead prevent the victim from doing that to avoid the police from comming.
Bailey by destroying thier phone and giving them a kicking.
Happy?
The other guys defence is "well your honour I feared for my life having just been violently attacked so it got a bit perfectly legally killingly"
You can’t kill someone because you assume that they were going to progress to beating you
Nice selective quoting there. Just shave off the end bit which is the entire crux of the issue.
Ok purely on the video content.
I doubt somoen who violently attacks somone before even saying a word will calmly wait while they fail the police and will instead prevent the victim from doing that to avoid the police from comming.
Bailey by destroying thier phone and giving them a kicking.
Happy?
The other guys defence is "well your honour I feared for my life having just been violently attacked so it got a bit perfectly legally killingly"
Pushing someone over isn't violently attacking them.
The guy was ****** off at someone shouting at his family and pushed them over.
Pushing someone over isn't violently attacking them. He pushed him and the guy ends up on the floor. If I was going to attack someone and try and really hurt them I wouldn't push them over and leave them there. The guy was ****** off at someone shouting at his family and pushed them over. Wouldn't it be great in the UK if every time someone pushes someone else they get shot dead.
Put it another way. If a police officer in the US has a gun pointed at a suspect and the suspect is moving away slowly and has their hands down, what should happen if they just start shooting the guy they have their gun pointed at.
Man, I'm out. If people genuinely think its OK to shoot a guy who has pushed you over and who you have a gun pointed at I don't know what to say.
I mean... I'd be fine with that because I don't go around pushing people over in supermarket car parks, or anywhere else for that matter. Do you?
Was the guy who got shot black ?
The only people who should feel any guilt about this are those that allowed the dead guy to still be wandering around and not doing some hard labour for all his past criminal activity. If he'd been behind bars or working a chain gang this situation would not have occurred, like so many others where a known multi offence wrong `un is free to do more harm despite a record making it obvious he'll always be trouble in society. But I guess burying him and a short trial will cost the US tax payer less than banging him up for years, so some possible bonus.