Soldato
I was waiting for someone to post something like that!lol
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I was really tempted to get a 5700XT to play with considering I got the Corsair H105 AIO with Corsair HG10 A1 on my old 290x, as well as a Icy Vision Rev.2 graphic cooler sitting on the shelf, but fought of the temptation and decided it would make more sense to wait for the 5800/5800XT (which will inevitably come at some point) and throw the cooler on that instead.Right, thats it, I couldn't bear it any longer, just ordered a sapphire 5700XT and a black Morpheus!
I was waiting for someone to post something like that!lol
Has anyone considered that maybe some of the blame lays with partners not being ready in time? AMD are heavily reliant on AIB sales, so not sure why they would intentionally hold back partner designs.
Even without the AIB's we've got poor default settings with poor coolers and driver issues.
So, business as usual then?
Those are all in AMD's control.
I just removed my limits from my 5700
Now boosting to 2050 core clock
941 on memory
Just got number 1 in firestrike
Which has always been an AMD weakness. We know this already, just as price gouging is Nvidia's weakness.
AMD might have a deal with it's AIBs to use the blower so it won't eat sales.
I'm pretty sure this is the case. Most of AMD's sales come from AIB, so it would make perfect sense. Nvidia simply don't give a damn.
Undervolting is the first thing that is needed here
It shows 10% higher numbers before any other overclocking or cooler replacement. And there is another 8%-12% gain on DX11 games by using PCIe 4.0 instead of 3.0.
AMD gave us here a very rough diamond. God knows what the 5800XT would provide when announced in January 2020 CES
Q4 '19 is more likely, unless they put it on HBM2+ / HBM3 (no reason to do that really unless they go BIG with the die and need tons of bandwidth).
What I need right now is benchmarks on a variety of games with a 5700 XT and custom cooler vs 2070 super. I really wanna see how this thing is doing vs the super because I was considering the super till I saw the great OC results and of course that + driver improvements this card could be doing really well in a few months....
I can't see them using HBM2 again, it's too costly and not abundant enough, and HBM3 isn't even in volume production yet.
The watercooled card working at stable 2200 range (+/- 50mhz), beats the heaviest overclocked 2070S and is very close to 2080.
That's impressive u smashed a stock 2080 rtx
The reality is that the performance wise the Navi will only continue to go up, whereas the Turing cards have already completely matured, and the only way to go is either stay the same, or to go down (once Nvidia stop optimising the cards for new games).HOLY MOTHER OF OH LAWD
That sounds amazing, but obv overclock gains are not uniform across all games so i'm told?
Please will some reviewer do a proper benchmark with an AIO or good air cooler / watercooling.
HOLY MOTHER OF OH LAWD
That sounds amazing, but obv overclock gains are not uniform across all games so i'm told?
Please will some reviewer do a proper benchmark with an AIO or good air cooler / watercooling.