Well thats a first for me. I was always taught to be open minded and not to look at everything as being black and white. How is that daft?
Keeping up with the Markles
- Thread starter antijoke
- Start date
Well, if I take off my hatred glasses I have to admit they arent harbouring a paedophile. Nobody under the age of puberty was involved, thus it literally cannot have been paedophilia no matter how much that drum might want to be banged. Certainly still very wrong but not paedophilia.
Epstein has been credibly accused of bringing in under age girls to his island for sex. Andrew used to hang out with him and he’s been seen with the girls....
He won’t go and speak to the fbi about it.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,078
I like how racism drove them away from the UK, so they moved to a country with an even a worse track record on racism matters.
Last edited:
Still doesnt mean that Andrew indulged in paedophilia. Paedophilia isnt merely underage, paedophilia is prepubescent. Thats literally the definition of it. What Andrew appears to have done was MASSIVELY wrong but it was no more paedophilia than it was necrophilia.
Theres nothing stopping them speaking up in their own defence, they just know if they do, they lose the illusion of Royalty. It’s pure cowardice and because she’s right and they are wrong.
That sounds remarkably optional. Are you entirely sure the FBI is charging him for sex crimes.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,711
I wonder how the situation would be if Harry was in line to be King instead of William
Ask the FBI investigating the whole thing.
Part of me always wished he was, he would be Henry the 9th. Theres something a bit more , I dont know...cool about a Henry the 9th than a William the 5th
So you genuinely believe that domestic violence can't happen to successful people, that people in those relationships never rationalise the position to the extent they support and defend it, or that they will never take their partners view in a conflict with their support network?
Because those are the myths you've just repeated as a dismissal.
Don't get me wrong, I hope I'm wrong, I wouldn't wish such a situation on anyone. Also, if I'm not wrong, I don't blame any of them for the situation. Blame isn't helpful, it's about understanding and helping people instead.
The interview is very interesting though, because it's put several clear falsehoods forward, and several further unspecified and unsubstantiated claims that will be subject to much closer scrutiny. It's a real insight into the nature of both of them.
A strong and brave man would have challenged and put a stop to any talk from a family member with regards to the colour of his unborn baby if it was put across in a racist way also he would not have gone and told his fragile wife who was struggling with suicidal thoughts at the time and instead shielded her from such comments.
On what basis are you concluding that when there is no rule currently to allow for a title to be given?
I think you'll find tours are a bit shorter than 10 years! In fact his first tour was cut short thanks to media coverage and his second was as a pilot and they tend to do short 4 month tours.
Being charged for sex crimes is extremely important to be public. So that would be a no, he isn't being charged with sex crimes.
nonetheless seems disingenuous; if they wanted their truth to be believed, they should have presented all, as a couple,
they are not like independant witnesses who haven't conferred (are they?)
the chosen format conveniently extends the broadcast too/advertising revenue (for those with the attention span to sit it out - wonder what viewing figures will show)
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2013
- Posts
- 22,335
- Location
- Rollergirl
Yea, because the entire world would have had an opinion on what you said or did and the tabloid press would have hounded you to within an inch of your life.
Lots of people do things and don’t get charged for them. Just because he’s not yet been charged doesn’t mean he is innocent. Epstein ended up dead.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,711
TIL Harry is Henry
Yea, because the entire world would have had an opinion on what you said or did and the tabloid press would have hounded you to within an inch of your life.
That's kind of his choice tbh... they're free to step away from the spotlight if they want to, what they don't get to do is to actively court publicity and then moan about the publicity they don't like/can't control.
Does make me wonder, would he choose to be Harry the 1st or stick with Henry the 9th. Harry the 1st would be pretty funny, like some sort of character from Only Fools and Horses or something
How do you know he didn’t put a stop to it? Seems like he’s been strong enough to get out of that toxic environment and is now clearly articulating why he had to do so, both for himself and his family, and people are attacking him for it.
We’ve even got people like Dolph here claiming that he’s got some kind of insight into the situation and that Harry has been so brainwashed that the credible and very reasonable actions he’s taken are all a form of coercive control that his wife has managed to initiate because he’s now a domestic abuse victim.