You're aware of the US biolabs in the Ukraine right?Where does it mention Ukraine. Also why do you think China might be deflecting on biological research?
Or you love lapping up Russian/Chinese propaganda?
You're aware of the US biolabs in the Ukraine right?Where does it mention Ukraine. Also why do you think China might be deflecting on biological research?
Or you love lapping up Russian/Chinese propaganda?
However if Putin simply wants something and shakes the tactical nuclear button then he should be under no doubt of the response.
Putin needs to know that a first strike - tactical or not - is just that. A first strike.
For Putin that seems to be that he owns the lives of those on his territory, thus taking a tactical nuke is something he can do. This promotes the chess moves - it involves the status of the attacked country.
1. An sovereign ex-soviet state is not part of NATO or Russia.
2. A first strike by Russia as a tactical weapon is not a first strike on NATO.
3. NATO can't 'retaliatory' nuclear tactical strike because adds more destruction to the sovereign state, nor can they retaliatory strike Russian territories as this is a first strike.
The point here is that the neutral status of the sovereign country allows the attack by Putin but doesn't allow the engage/retaliatory strikes. It's cold logic.
This is why Putin wants a buffer zone of those states and proceeds to throw his toys in the event they show the desire to join NATO/EU.
If those states joined NATO then any tactical nuke aggression would be a first strike by Putin on NATO, and the game of chess is checkmate. If Putin goes to nuclear then he simply imitates his own destruction.
You're aware of the US biolabs in the Ukraine right?
Probably best not to detour into covid discussion on this thread.Yea i mean China was accused of developing Covid in a lab and Russia went on a rampage and poisoned multiple people abroad with something developed in a lab, i wonder why they are both trying to do this, hmm head scratch.....
You're aware of the US biolabs in the Ukraine right?
No, please show me them. Photos or some official website of the biolab would be great.
I'm pretty sure KRH are based in Tidworth. Maybe they are going home? If they have been down there they may have been using the ranges?
That's a great video. He's saying the kinda things about the nuclear issue that I've been saying from day 1. Right now, there's little threat of Putin nuking somewhere, but that's only because there's fresh terror each day and the war is sort of going to plan. The Ukrainians will lose eventually. If it tips the other way and Russian progress gets properly bogged down, Putin will nuke somewhere. He'll do it because it will do two things. Firstly it will mean an immediate Ukrainian surrender. Secondly it will scare the bejesus out of everyone and Putin will get a moment of utter shock to exploit.
I think this fella has it entirely right about it not being an invasion of Ukraine too. It just happens to be Ukraine, but Putin is really fighting the US and the West.
Lawd, I'm trying very hard to avoid all the usual nonsense but you've got me here: show me the labs pls.
non ***** wagons unlike the lads in Estonia
I'm still looking for sources you'll happily accept, in the meantime here's the US embassy in the Ukraine outlining some programs and upgrading labs to bio level 2
https://ua.usembassy.gov/embassy/ky...n-office/biological-threat-reduction-program/
It wont mean an immediate Ukraine surrender. They wont give up or give in. No matter what.
Puty will NEVER win. Even if he controls 100% of Ukraine! His days are numbered.
So they helped Ukraine out with Covid19 work Ukraine was doing. That is your Fauci biolab is it?
I've always though that the word decimate always sounds a lot worse than it is, still bad, but to decimate something sounds like completely destroying it, when in reality the definition isnt quite so.*UK DEFENCE CHIEF: PUTIN'S FORCES IN THE UKRAINE WAR HAVE BEEN DECIMATED - THE TIMES.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...are-decimated-says-uk-defence-chief-x7khnbfzq
Honestly, I don't like your tone, I'm not sure why you're so combative and derisory. Who mentioned fauci? I just said it was something I'm looking into.
Like a scene from a WW2 film
I'm still looking for sources you'll happily accept, in the meantime here's the US embassy in the Ukraine outlining some programs and upgrading labs to bio level 2
https://ua.usembassy.gov/embassy/ky...n-office/biological-threat-reduction-program/
The U.S. Department of Defense’s Biological Threat Reduction Program collaborates with partner countries to counter the threat of outbreaks (deliberate, accidental, or natural) of the world’s most dangerous infectious diseases.
I'm confused. The first sentence in that post says this:
I mean, it's pretty much irrelevant to this topic but still - how do you make this a point worth discussing?