• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

OcUK RX6*50XT series review thread

Soldato
Joined
8 Jan 2003
Posts
3,692
Location
Scotland
AMD's stagnant market share is more important as a longer term measure of success. AMD should have gained a lot more ground considering how relatively powerful their latest generation of cards has been. Hopefully they'll get their marketing right with RDNA 3.
Well according to some, for them to switch to AMD. AMD would have to be faster at raster, faster at Ray tracing, offer a DLSS alternative and have to pretty much give the card away. So when they say they buy the card with the best features/performance, I take that with a pinch of salt.
 
Associate
Joined
21 Apr 2007
Posts
2,483
AMD's stagnant market share is more important as a longer term measure of success. AMD should have gained a lot more ground considering how relatively powerful their latest generation of cards has been. Hopefully they'll get their marketing right with RDNA 3.
Its volume production that's the problem, the marketing is just there to justify price fixin* cough position.

Hopefully AMD have ordered a large amount of wafers this time and TSMC can deliver, then at least they have options.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Feb 2019
Posts
17,464
One reason they are sticking with N7+/N6 is because of volume ; Apple have moved node and AMD got as much as they could ontop of orders. Cant see nvidia getting much from Apple this time around.

Nvidia got clever they asked tsmc to do a custom 4nm node for them so they are not competing with anyone else, just the general demand for wafer that everyone faces regardless of node
 
Back
Top Bottom