• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

OcUK RX6*50XT series review thread

labbby said:
nice.. I miss them :cry:

thought i'd get in on the off topic stuff in here lol
Click to expand...
I managed to destickify the fury x's too. The one is still broken though. I think the core or memory is dead and I'm not up to the task of replacing the whole gpu and memory die.
 
Jumper118 said:
I managed to destickify the fury x's too. The one is still broken though. I think the core or memory is dead and I'm not up to the task of replacing the whole gpu and memory die.
Click to expand...
i would like to add beer sticky not any other kind of sticky lol
 
Ross Thomson said:
Their financials would suggest other wise.
Click to expand...
AMD's stagnant market share is more important as a longer term measure of success. AMD should have gained a lot more ground considering how relatively powerful their latest generation of cards has been. Hopefully they'll get their marketing right with RDNA 3.
 
FastnBulbous said:
AMD's stagnant market share is more important as a longer term measure of success. AMD should have gained a lot more ground considering how relatively powerful their latest generation of cards has been. Hopefully they'll get their marketing right with RDNA 3.
Click to expand...
Well according to some, for them to switch to AMD. AMD would have to be faster at raster, faster at Ray tracing, offer a DLSS alternative and have to pretty much give the card away. So when they say they buy the card with the best features/performance, I take that with a pinch of salt.
 
FastnBulbous said:
AMD's stagnant market share is more important as a longer term measure of success. AMD should have gained a lot more ground considering how relatively powerful their latest generation of cards has been. Hopefully they'll get their marketing right with RDNA 3.
Click to expand...
Its volume production that's the problem, the marketing is just there to justify price fixin* cough position.

Hopefully AMD have ordered a large amount of wafers this time and TSMC can deliver, then at least they have options.
 
One reason they are sticking with N7+/N6 is because of volume ; Apple have moved node and AMD got as much as they could ontop of orders. Cant see nvidia getting much from Apple this time around.
 
Harlequin said:
One reason they are sticking with N7+/N6 is because of volume ; Apple have moved node and AMD got as much as they could ontop of orders. Cant see nvidia getting much from Apple this time around.
Click to expand...

Nvidia got clever they asked tsmc to do a custom 4nm node for them so they are not competing with anyone else, just the general demand for wafer that everyone faces regardless of node
 
Grim5 said:
Nvidia got clever they asked tsmc to do a custom 4nm node for them so they are not competing with anyone else, just the general demand for wafer that everyone faces regardless of node
Click to expand...

That`ll cost nvidia a lot then, moving to bleeding edge at TSMC away from Samsung and its own 7/5/4 EUV product. Consumer cards will be expensive
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom