• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** AMD "Zen 4" thread (inc AM5/APU discussion) ***

humbug said:
Its really not.
Click to expand...
What do you mean it's really not? The 13600k will land around the 24-24.5k mark. That means it is in fact closer to the 7900x than to the 7700x. (17% vs 26%). Let's not even start talking about the 7600x at all, that one is a joke
 
Last edited:
Bencher said:
Im pretty confident the 13600k will be more efficient than the 7600x and probably than the 7700x, so im not really sure what you are talking about. Especially at ISO wattage, they won't even be close in the low - mid range, intel will fly past amd both in performance and efficiency.
Click to expand...

He's trying to set me off with that...
 
Bencher said:
What do you mean it's really not? The 13600k will land around the 24-24.5k mark. That means it is in fact closer to the 7900x than to the 7700x. (17% vs 26%). Let's not even start talking about the 7600x at all, that one is a joke
Click to expand...

Ha, I knew the missing context would really irk you, what does he mean???????

Sweat it!
 
Last edited:
Bencher said:
It's not competing with zen 3, it's competing with raptorlake. Stop having double standards and see it for what it is. Rocketlake had 20% single core increase in like 10 months compared to 2 years that it took for zen 4. Did you consider rocketlake a great generation? :D
Click to expand...

How long did they stay stuck on 4 cores ? Also isn't that 7950x score at stock with aio at the stated power usage not impressive? Let me guess it isn't right I wonder why
 
Last edited:
uscool said:
How long did they stay stuck on 4 cores ? Also isn't that 7950x score at stock with aio at the stated power usage not impressive? Let me guess it isn't right I wonder why
Click to expand...

Probably until Intel threw in the towel on trying to hold core counts down.
 
uscool said:
How long did they stay stuck on 4 cores ? Also isn't that 7950x score at stock with aio at the stated power usage not impressive? Let me guess it isn't right I wonder why
Click to expand...
Probably as long as amd is stuck at 6 cores.

I dont know what the stock power draw is. If its 170,sure its impressive. If its 220+, different story. Of course i always knew the 7950x would be good / competitive. The rest of the lineup though is completely outdated.
 
b6ff33d210a9ac5d84a3201aa86d50b0df7a5d36ae12a57b0384e970676767a4.png


fffceceff0f1b615a8d7f082dc191c396f6288d19aef498d7b19c784299ff493.png
 
funny a couple of those leaked game results favor intel hardware, be nice to know what cpu speed, ram speed, board, gpu was used and power numbers are like
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom