Today's mass shooting in the US

Sankari said:
And here we go.
Click to expand...

Difficult not to agree with the vast majority of those tweets. The TRA have gotten used to the police and authorities just standing by when they assault and abuse those they see as against their cause (the scenes in Australia just this week show it) Maybe if the police treat the TRA as harshly as normal people then they probably think twice. The hysterical trans genocide nonsense needed to be challenged but the narrative has been allowed to fester.
 
PlacidCasual said:
A male has committed a mass shotting the way many males commit mass shootings nearly everyday it seems in the US. Most of the time their politics isn't the central issue, it's that desperate people have access to weapons.
Click to expand...
This can only be considered another mentally deranged person with access to guns at this point, like most school shooters. However the police apparently found a manifesto, and if it states on there the reason for this was extreme trans ideology then it would become the first (afaik) trans extremist terrorist attack
 
PlacidCasual said:
A male has committed a mass shotting the way many males commit mass shootings nearly everyday it seems in the US. Most of the time their politics isn't the central issue, it's that desperate people have access to weapons.
Click to expand...

She was a mentally deranged woman, not a desperate male.

Access to weapons is the only thing you've gotten right here.
 
Efour said:
I like today's mass shooting it's much more interesting than the usual.
Click to expand...

Man,

I've spent the last few hours trying to read up about this radical trans stuff, and my brain has turned into jelly.

I got to one website, where some trans lunatic was preaching that we should rename women to "uterus-bearers" in order to not offend trans people.

It feels like these trans lunatics are just being silly, like children who have eaten too much sugar and have stayed up too late.
 
platinum87 said:
She was a mentally deranged woman, not a desperate male.

Access to weapons is the only thing you've gotten right here.
Click to expand...

My apologies, I understood the person to be a trans-gender woman therefore male. If this is incorrect this individual would be quite unusual as females don't typically do these things.

Most mass shooters are male at least in the anglosphere. I have read opinion pieces that males tend to externalise there crises more than females as an explanation as to why this is the case.

@XeNoN89 I try not to read too much into motives too early in cases like this, I assume mental crises before terrorism even when there are evidence of "radicalism" because one often precedes the other. It's different when it's long term adherence to political cause such as the IRA or similar with more recognisably political goals.
 
Screeeech said:
Man,

I've spent the last few hours trying to read up about this radical trans stuff, and my brain has turned into jelly.

I got to one website, where some trans lunatic was preaching that we should rename women to "uterus-bearers" in order to not offend trans people.

It feels like these trans lunatics are just being silly, like children who have eaten too much sugar and have stayed up too late.
Click to expand...
Every group has its nutters.
This isn’t anything new.
America has a gun problem.
 
PlacidCasual said:
My apologies, I understood the person to be a trans-gender woman therefore male. If this is incorrect this individual would be quite unusual as females don't typically do these things.

Most mass shooters are male at least in the anglosphere. I have read opinion pieces that males tend to externalise there crises more than females as an explanation as to why this is the case.

@XeNoN89 I try not to read too much into motives too early in cases like this, I assume mental crises before terrorism even when there are evidence of "radicalism" because one often precedes the other. It's different when it's long term adherence to political cause such as the IRA or similar with more recognisably political goals.
Click to expand...
A transgender woman and went by she from what I have read.
 
robgmun said:
They targetted Christians, which are widely seen as Anti-Trans
Click to expand...

She targeted people at a Christian school she previously attended. Whether or not she targeted them specifically because they were Christian, we may never know because she's dead now.
 
Last edited:
The media has reported it both ways.
It's really confusing but she started as a she ended as a he. Is what I think right?
 
Angilion said:
A group identity ideology explicitly encourages violence, frames it as a righteous response to an existential threat and calls for a day of vengeance. That's not irrelevant. For some strains of group identity ideology it would be illegal in itself. Imagine, for example, a whitist ideology calling itself the White Radical Activist Network claiming that people who they consider to be "not white" were conspiring to kill all "white" people and explicitly encouraging violence against non-whites on that basis, calling for a day of vengeance. That would be illegal in itself. They would bear some responsibility if someone did exactly what they were calling on people to do. As does the Trans Radical Activist Network for doing the same thing.
Click to expand...

I'd call the group
White Activist Radical Network
Click to expand...

Which gives you the much cooler acronym WARN
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom