Karma comes at you fast
Karma comes at you fast
I think the key difference is that Ukraine attacked some military targets and a couple of drones missed and hit civilian targets which they will no doubt be unhappy/sad about. Russia on the other hand attacked some civilian targets and hit some civilian targets, something they will no doubt be very pleased/happy about.Do two wrongs make a right?
Think of it more like Israel bombing areas of Gaza where Hamas fire rockets towards civilian areas in Israel. Russia has a lot of S300/S400 launchers in and around Belgorod which are used in ground attacks inside of Ukraine, Ukraine in turn are allowed to strike back at those targets. If Russian was concerned about people getting killed as a result they shouldn't be hiding military weapons in that city. Of course if anyone thinks it's not ok for Israel or Ukraine to go after these terrorists in such a way because it results in Civilian deaths I understand but keep in mind being passive only results in more aggression.Do two wrongs make a right?
Surprised they don't focus more on just killing the source of the problem eg a missile up putins ass instead of responding with civilian deaths.
That will be hilarious if trueAbit of confusion right now if it actually Russian air defence missiles that have gone wrong.
I dont have any quotes or such, but I'm under the impression they have just been stipulated not to use western supplied weapons to strike within Russian borders. I dont remember hearing any calls to not strike Russia full stop. Besides they are under absolutely no obligations when it comes to their own developed weapon systems.I mean the West has done nothing but tell Ukraine not to strike Russia
I dont have any quotes or such, but I'm under the impression they have just been stipulated not to use western supplied weapons to strike within Russian borders. I dont remember hearing any calls to not strike Russia full stop. Besides they are under absolutely no obligations when it comes to their own developed weapon systems.
Can you believe it.
BBC reports meeting is being held at 2100GMT, granted the source it Russia...Request denied.
UN Security Council meeting to take place later today, Russia says
As we reported earlier, Russia has requested a meeting of the UN Security Council in the light of events in Belgorod.
Now, Russian news agency TASS is quoting the Russian Permanent Mission to the UN as saying that the meeting will take place at 21:00 GMT.
Do two wrongs make a right?
Surprised they don't focus more on just killing the source of the problem eg a missile up putins ass instead of responding with civilian deaths.
BBC reports meeting is being held at 2100GMT, granted the source it Russia...
Oh I agree, it makes even more of a farce that is the UNSC than it already is. Nothing will happen, Russia will say its piece, nobody will care, tiny violins will play and everybody goes about their business as they were before.The UN shouldn’t be humouring complaints of unfair resistance to terrorism. Lavrov grandstanding in an attempt to show the Kremlin cares about its people caught up in this war is beyond pathetic at this stage.
Provisional Rules of Procedure (S/96/Rev.7)
Chapter I: Meetings
Rule 1
Meetings of the Security Council shall, with the exception of the periodic meetings referred to in rule 4, be held at the call of the President at any time he deems necessary, but the interval between meetings shall not exceed fourteen days.
Rule 2
The President shall call a meeting of the Security Council at the request of any member of the Security Council.
Rule 3
The President shall call a meeting of the Security Council if a dispute or situation is brought to the attention of the Security Council under Article 35 or under Article I I (3) of the Charter, or if the General Assembly makes recommendations or refers any question to the Security Council under Article 11 (2), or if the Secretary-General brings to the attention of the Security Council any matter under Article 99.
Rule 4
Periodic meetings of the Security Council called for in Article 28 (2) of the Charter shall be held twice a year, at such times as the Security Council may decide.
Rule 5
Meetings of the Security Council shall normally be held at the seat of the United Nations.
Any member of the Security-Council or the Secretary-General may propose that the Security Council should meet at another place. Should the Security Council accept any such proposal, it shall decide upon the place and the period during which the Council shall meet at such place.
Request denied.
I’m surprised also they haven’t gone for more significant locations.Russians only respect force.
I don't blame the Ukrainians for having enough and making the Russian serfs now suffer and make them realise they are in a real war with real consequences.
After all, these are home grown drones, not Atacms.
NATO and especially the US can't say **** how they use these.
They should swarm Putin's Sochi palace or hit the elites in their Moscow high-rises.
Kremlin using their civilians as human shields ala Hamas, all above board in Pentagontown. Additionally it's obviously Russian anti-air as per their own explanation for deaths in Ukraine.I can't agree with Ukraine hitting civilian targets. I do understand why they want to though.
I dont have any quotes or such, but I'm under the impression they have just been stipulated not to use western supplied weapons to strike within Russian borders. I dont remember hearing any calls to not strike Russia full stop. Besides they are under absolutely no obligations when it comes to their own developed weapon systems.