It's interesting that we attack the government 24/7 accusing them of being corrupt bad people. But in a time of war we're expected to assume our government is above board, totally honest, and beyond criticism.
It's interesting that we attack the government 24/7 accusing them of being corrupt bad people. But in a time of war we're expected to assume our government is above board, totally honest, and beyond criticism.
Absolute state of this.
Carlson just sits there drinking it up like free beer.
Just come out and say what you mean. Vagueposting doesn't advance the discussion.
Cheers, I have neither the time nor inclination to watch that gutter level "interview". I'd be much more inclined to watch it, if it had been conducted by a more reputable host. Even then though I fully suspect all questions would be fully scripted/vetted regardless of host/interviewer.Good summary here for anyone that doesn't want to waste 2 hours of their life https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-68248740
He wouldn't of been allowed into Russia if that was even remotely possible lol...I wonder what Putin would have to say to get any sort of rebuke from old Tucker.
I wonder what Putin would have to say to get any sort of rebuke from old Tucker.
I see Boris gets a mention for scuppering the deal. I remember when that happened as Boris did one of his blustering interviews dismissing the deal.Do we do that? What war are you referring too BTW?
He wouldn't of been allowed into Russia if that was even remotely possible lol...
Whole thing is a farce to further Russian interests, obviously.
I see Boris gets a mention for scuppering the deal. I remember when that happened as Boris did one of his blustering interviews dismissing the deal.
Most people don't have a critical mind when it comes to war. I remember being in the US just after 9/11 and they were all gung-ho to bomb Iraq, even though it was already clear Iraq/Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11.
The dodgy dossier that Blair and Campbell put forward about weapons of mass destruction. A total lie, and both of them are still promoted in the media.
It's interesting that we attack the government 24/7 accusing them of being corrupt bad people. But in a time of war we're expected to assume our government is above board, totally honest, and beyond criticism.
I see Boris gets a mention for scuppering the deal. I remember when that happened as Boris did one of his blustering interviews dismissing the deal.
Most people don't have a critical mind when it comes to war. I remember being in the US just after 9/11 and they were all gung-ho to bomb Iraq, even though it was already clear Iraq/Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11.
The dodgy dossier that Blair and Campbell put forward about weapons of mass destruction. A total lie, and both of them are still promoted in the media.
That was against war in general. At the time they still thought that Iraq had WMD, and that Iraq was responsible. Because that was the lie being fed.News to me and the vast majority of the population, see the demos during the second gulf war.
Bang goes that theory
That was against war in general. At the time they still thought that Iraq had WMD, and that Iraq was responsible. Because that was the lie being fed.
This interview also goes to show that Putins propaganda is working among a significant portion of the US population (and some in the UK obviously). It's what he does, he soes doubt and division. And Tucker is a pawn in his game (surely making tons of money in the process despite leaving Fox).
Right wing Americans really have a lot to answer for these days.. they really are twisting democracy and world norms, yet they accuse every one else of doing it.
I can't be bothered to watch the video but does Putin mention why Russia was also forced to invade Poland 16 days later?Absolute state of this.
Carlson just sits there drinking it up like free beer.
Just come out and say what you mean. Vagueposting doesn't advance the discussion.
Then if that's the case then I respectfully say your argument is moronic and is utter tripe. If you think difficult negotiations are not possible then you have a screw loose. This is why we have concepts of escrow, collateral, poison pills where it becomes difficult to break the terms because of force not relying on trust.
Or has there never been difficult agreements in the past. Personally I think people are so brainwashed they think in black and white like their propaganda tells them to (on both sides...) and thus shades of grey make them uncomfortable to face reality of what they will have supported dying to reach same conclusion.