Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,693
- Location
- London
Personally I don't think United should sack ETH.
Its a bit like Arteta, its took two years before things started to improve.
United where very poor before ETH took over. So I don't think they are poor because of him. I understand he's excuse that he's best players haven't been available. Maybe they should have still performance a bit better but I think the United board should back the manager give him some money to buy a few players and give him one more season before making a decision.
Its a bit like Arteta, its took two years before things started to improve.
United where very poor before ETH took over. So I don't think they are poor because of him. I understand he's excuse that he's best players haven't been available. Maybe they should have still performance a bit better but I think the United board should back the manager give him some money to buy a few players and give him one more season before making a decision.
Last edited: