Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 7,053
Arent you a Chelsea supporter?You are paying an absolute dud of a player much more so it's not really hard to believe at all. Big money is the main attraction for going to/staying at OT nowadays.
Arent you a Chelsea supporter?You are paying an absolute dud of a player much more so it's not really hard to believe at all. Big money is the main attraction for going to/staying at OT nowadays.
Yup and imo have the best defence in the league when you factor in our attacking stats from our full backs compared to other teams£75m on VVD just keeps getting cheaper. If Utd end up paying north of £70m on Maguire then their first choice back 4 would have cost around £180-200m and still be some way behind ours which cost a shade over £85m.
Is Maguire even that good, I know he’s solid and all, but is he the standout centreback that’s available...
Who the hell is this brazilian striker arsenal have signed
70 million for Maguire
Demebele had a chronic condition that meant he could only play at PL pace with lots of injections. He left to play in an easier league for a lot of £££.Why did spurs sell dembele to then only go out and break clubs transfer record to sign the same player mk2?
£75m on VVD just keeps getting cheaper. If Utd end up paying north of £70m on Maguire then their first choice back 4 would have cost around £180-200m and still be some way behind ours which cost a shade over £85m.
This is a silly argument. If players are considered good then have a price tag to compliment it. AWB for example was fantastic last season and we are desperate for a RB. Hence the price. Even still if we end up with a back four of Shaw, Lindelof, Maguire and AWB. I am not going to complain. With Smalling, Jones, Bailly and Dalot as back up there is certainly a lot of depth in our defence again. If Dave can get his act together and back to his world number 1 best it is going to be an enjoyable season.
What's silly about my arguement? I was commenting on how well Liverpool have done relative to others. Utd and City could end up with back 4's costing well over twice ours and yet we'll have the best back 4 in the league, if not Europe. The work Liverpool have done in the transfer market has been outstanding for a number of years and it's not that surprising to me the talk that we won't be overly active this summer. We're seeing with the deals that have been done and the money being asked for, for not the greatest players that this is very much a sellers market this year.This is a silly argument. If players are considered good then have a price tag to compliment it. AWB for example was fantastic last season and we are desperate for a RB. Hence the price. Even still if we end up with a back four of Shaw, Lindelof, Maguire and AWB. I am not going to complain. With Smalling, Jones, Bailly and Dalot as back up there is certainly a lot of depth in our defence again. If Dave can get his act together and back to his world number 1 best it is going to be an enjoyable season.
Another cheap "promising" player from far away, who'll end up spending 3-5 years on loan to some crappy la liga side, with people saying every summer that this will be his year. then finally, he'll disappear off back to Brazil on a free in 5 years or so when everyone finally realises that he was never that good anyway. Don't you remember Wellington Silva?Who the hell is this brazilian striker arsenal have signed
What's silly about my arguement? I was commenting on how well Liverpool have done relative to others. Utd and City could end up with back 4's costing well over twice ours and yet we'll have the best back 4 in the league, if not Europe. The work Liverpool have done in the transfer market has been outstanding for a number of years and it's not that surprising to me the talk that we won't be overly active this summer. We're seeing with the deals that have been done and the money being asked for, for not the greatest players that this is very much a sellers market this year.
How do you know it's not 200k? Do you have a source that states the actual figure?2. It's not 200k or 300k, the fact that both of these have been reported shows that what you're reading don't know what the **** they are talking about.
Well you've not won the League or CL for ages and you're still paying crazy fees so that's clearly not the reason. The reason is because Utd have set a precedent for paying stupid fees, they're now having to repeat that. It's no different with the contracts you're handing out to average players. Utd pay OTT because they've continuously made stupid decisions over the past 5-6 years.
How do you know it's not 200k? Do you have a source that states the actual figure?