• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Who here has Metro 2033 and an FX-83## or FX-81##

BlackRavenRig said:
But it will still be inferior to an Nvidia setup seeing as Physx in Metro is an Nvidia implemented feature.
Click to expand...


It also runs off the CPU if you don't have an Nvidia GPU.

metrophysx.png
 
metro2033bench.jpg


That's with a 7970 and an 8150, which is running at 4.1Ghz with 4.4/4.6 turbo.

Looks like my results are pretty poor compared.
 
humbug said:
And and AMD GPU, preferably similar to mine, or any will do.

I want to compare a Metro 2033 Game bench with Advanced Physx. :)
Click to expand...

I dont see why you are so interested in this, I doubt it runs very well. Nvidia have made sure of that.

By the time there are cpu's fast enough to run physx, we will have even faster gpu's or no cpu's at all.
 
opethdisciple said:
I dont see why you are so interested in this, I doubt it runs very well. Nvidia have made sure of that.

By the time there are cpu's fast enough to run physx, we will have even faster gpu's or no cpu's at all.
Click to expand...

Actualy so far it runs perfectly fine, i run it in game and its smooth enough.
I'm interested to see is the FX-83## can deal with it better than mine, as a measure of its performance.
 
humbug said:
Thanks ^^^^ but its the CPU performance i'm interested in, your running Physx off your GTX 680 SLI, not the CPU :)

You might be interested in this http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18451929
Click to expand...

I can turn off Phsyx on the GPU and do another run.
Just went into the NV control panel and set Physx to CPU.

Performance as expected is terrible running Physx on the CPU.
Minimum frame rates well under 10 and averages in the 30's why would you want that.

FX8320 4.6Ghz Physx running on CPU
FX8320-metro-cpu-physx.png
 
Last edited:
PCZ said:
I can turn off Phsyx on the GPU and do another run.
Just went into the NV control panel and set Physx to CPU.

Performance as expected is terrible running Physx on the CPU.
Minimum frame rates well under 10 and averages in the 30's why would you want that.
Click to expand...

I don't know if that's any better than me or not.
 
I will repeat the CPU Physx test on an Intel PC later.
The FX83's IPC is too low to do the job properly i feel.
 
A comparison with your GPU's to that would be good :) but its impossible to compare Avg FPS when your running SLI GTX 680 against a 7870.

But your Min and Avg FPS are lower than mine, yet higher than X3T who is running an FX-8150 @ 4.1 / 4.4Ghz with a 7970 @ 1070 / 1400 which is not a to big gain from mine at 1200 / 1500
 
I don't think it matters too much what the GPU is with such a large bottleneck in the CPU.

I ran this test on my 8150 also and performance was lower than the 8320 at the same clock speed.
min frame rate was 6.87 and average 29 something.
didn't grab a screenshot and that CPU is not in the MB anymore.
The 8320 is a bit faster clock for clock than the older BD's such as the 8150
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom