Associate
Something like 8-12 P-Cores + 8-32 E-Cores would be ideal for every use case scenario.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
14th Gen "Raptor Lake Refresh"
- Thread starter Dave2150
- Start date
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 0
I'd be surprised if that 14600k is a 8P configuration. If it is and priced like the 13600k, deal of the year easily.
Apparently it is 8P + 8E for the 14600k ....
Rumored lineup of Intel 14th Gen Core "Raptor Lake Refresh" series shows more cores and higher clocks - VideoCardz.com
Update: There is new information claiming a different configuration of Core i5-14600K. Intel’s Refresh of Raptor Lake: the final attempt to sell LGA1700 CPUs Intel’s upcoming desktop lineup gets first rumored specs The most important changes for Raptor Lake Refresh are higher core count for...
videocardz.com
Last edited:
Apparently it is 8P + 8E for the 14600k ....
Rumored lineup of Intel 14th Gen Core "Raptor Lake Refresh" series shows more cores and higher clocks - VideoCardz.com
Update: There is new information claiming a different configuration of Core i5-14600K. Intel’s Refresh of Raptor Lake: the final attempt to sell LGA1700 CPUs Intel’s upcoming desktop lineup gets first rumored specs The most important changes for Raptor Lake Refresh are higher core count for...
If its true i'd be tempted purely for gaming, need to see what the ipc uplift is though and see a few benchmarks for 1440p gaming.
Absolutely zero, will get a performance increase from extra cores and frequency.
true, we aren't changing nodes just adding cores and increasing frequency.
Might be, as Intel need to find something. Add 2 cores and drop 4 threads, disable a few features. Should still have good separation from the 12900 and 13900.
Last edited:
Soldato
Too good to be true. The i9 12900k ends up worse than an i5 in the span of 2 years. That's a huge leap if true.
Last edited:
time to upgrade that 12900k to an i5- 14600k
Soldato
Nah im planning to go for the 900ktime to upgrade that 12900k to an i5- 14600k
Soldato
Nobody cares about stock power consumption cause nobody runs it stock, lol
Welcome back! Didn't you switch from 13900k to 12900k due to high power consumption? Were you unable to optimize the settings and had to use stock settings?
Soldato
I switched cause there was no performance difference in 4k,the 4090 was a huge bottleneck, while the 13900k was pulling more power in games. Regretted not going for the ks.
For non gaming workloads the 13900k was a dream though, way more efficient than my 12900k. My 12900k needed 300w to get the same performance as the 13900k at 100w, so there is that
But how is that relevant?
Last edited:
Associate
Maybe the refresh is to reduce power consumption rather than increase performance
Press X to call BS
Last edited:
Considering how much the current generation consumes, even if it were just that scenario, it would still be a great success for Intel, lol. However, most customers logically won't be satisfied with that, just like they weren't satisfied with Nvidia's 4000 series, which consumes significantly less than the previous generation. But customers also want a leap in performance when they buy something new, no matter how affordable the product may be.
Soldato
It's true, 12900k needs around 280 to 300w to hit 30-31k in cbr23. The 13900k does it at 100-110 watts.