Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,980
who are the idiots that phone five live
some idiotic... pathetic comments from people that have no idea.
does my head in
some idiotic... pathetic comments from people that have no idea.
does my head in
With that statement proves that you know as much about football as the makers of footballers wives. Your sellecting a player for a World Cup side on the basis of one performance (which i dont remember) over a proven world class player. And again i never brought Lampard into anything, i was commenting on your comments!! Of which i have lost any respect i had for.JohnnyG said:You really are a full of **** mate
King has already done a better job holding for England than anyone else I've seen in that position recently, that's a fact even Gerrard's dad would agree too, so he would be my choice above anyone else, simple really.
As for not bringing Lampard in to it, don't be a ****
lemonkettaz said:who are the idiots that phone five live
some idiotic... pathetic comments from people that have no idea.
does my head in
JohnnyG just phoned in about putting King in the side ahead of Gerrardlemonkettaz said:who are the idiots that phone five live
some idiotic... pathetic comments from people that have no idea.
does my head in
Thanks, but i did realise that for myself.Marvt74 said:Not really he is saying he'd rather have King in the particular role than Gerrard not that he wants to exclude Gerrard from the entire squad.
Which rule have i broken? The only rule i may have broken is the "no personal attack", which i think JohnnyG has offended more than i have.Gilly said:BaZ, refresh your memory on the forum rules please.
Oh he can definitely do it, and I'd prefer to see him there over anyone, but he has to be told to do it. He and Lamps as box-to-box doesn't work. He has to be told to hang back.Chong Warrior said:Gerrard cannot play the holding role... how can you say he does? He's liverpools top scorer isn't he? Does he play that role for 'pool? No
Surely though that JohnnyG has offended more than myself. I claimed he spoke "Total crap", he said i was full of **** and that i talk rubbishGilly said:You haven't quite broken it yet, thats why your posting priviliges haven't been removed.
First, at the top of the Sports forum there is a rules thread. In it you'll find words like respect. Second, at the top of the forum page you will see the letters F, A and Q. In here are the rules, you will also find similar words to respect in here, along with words like personal, attack and do not.
This was what i have been trying to explain.Gilly said:Oh he can definitely do it, and I'd prefer to see him there over anyone, but he has to be told to do it. He and Lamps as box-to-box doesn't work. He has to be told to hang back.
Yes, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and an opinion is something you can't change very easily. If you don't like Johnny's opinion, just ignore it, as he will no doubt do with yours.BaZ87 said:This was what i have been trying to explain.
Chong Warrior said:Gerrard cannot play the holding role well... how can you say he does? He's liverpools top scorer isn't he? Does he play that role for 'pool? No
Gerrard and Lampard are both class midfielders, they're just too similar and it doesn't work to play them together.
Anyway I'd rather see Carrick & Gerrard in the centre of Englands midfield, but it just doesn't seem right to have a player like Lampard on the bench!
King did play well that game but he can't hold a candle to Carrick in that position.
cymatty said:Who got Man of the Match btw?