not convinced how?
Hi-C Caps are proven, the technology is nobel prize winning and they are used in all places where reliability is essential and price is not an issue (i.e. the international space station ) they aren't something that MSI just came up with, they've been around for years but they cost more. MSI were the first to impliment them on consumer level components, I think their Big Bang X58 board may have been the first.
as for the efficiency improvements you just need to look at power consumption figures in reviews.
I find button onboard much easier for debugging once the system is built but i know what you mean
UEFI is a pretty big step IMO & i'm shocked that Gigabyte are so far behind when even Asrock can manage it.
tbh i lost faith in gigabyte when my X58A-UD5 ended up being buggy and unstable with the worst SATA 6gbps performance imaginable. I'm wondering where all the money they made over the recent years has gone because it surely hasnt gone into R&D
Hi-C Caps are proven, the technology is nobel prize winning and they are used in all places where reliability is essential and price is not an issue (i.e. the international space station ) they aren't something that MSI just came up with, they've been around for years but they cost more. MSI were the first to impliment them on consumer level components, I think their Big Bang X58 board may have been the first.
as for the efficiency improvements you just need to look at power consumption figures in reviews.
I find button onboard much easier for debugging once the system is built but i know what you mean
UEFI is a pretty big step IMO & i'm shocked that Gigabyte are so far behind when even Asrock can manage it.
tbh i lost faith in gigabyte when my X58A-UD5 ended up being buggy and unstable with the worst SATA 6gbps performance imaginable. I'm wondering where all the money they made over the recent years has gone because it surely hasnt gone into R&D
Last edited: