2006 Malaysian Grand Prix - Race 2/18

Type_R said:
Funny how they did not protest about Massa at the same time, especially as afterwards he finished in front of MS :p

They only had video evidence for Schumachers front and rear wing.

The rear wing was even more obvious that then front tbh...

Down the straight it started vibrating like mad...a sure sign that it had stalled.

Was interesting that the only teams who didn't sign it were Red Bull and Toro Rosso... Make you wonder if Red Bull are contracted to go with Ferrari *as Sauber were*

Simon/~Flibster
 
FIA tell McLaren and BMW to change wings

McLaren-Mercedes and BMW-Sauber are the two other teams required to make modifications to their rear wings in time for the Australian Grand Prix.

In Malaysia, the FIA told Ferrari that they must bring modified front and rear wings to Melbourne, or face the consequences.

A planned post-race protest from eight other teams (including McLaren and BMW) about the Ferrari front wing was put on hold, after race director Charlie Whiting brokered a deal that allowed the Italians to run unmolested in the Malaysian GP - on condition that new or modified parts were taken to Australia.

There were rumours that two other teams were also told to make changes, but their identity did not emerge immediately.

The changes required on the BMW wing are apparently relatively minor compared to those on the Ferrari and McLaren.

Furthermore, the FIA will issue no form of clarification or rule update before the next race - the teams concerned have simply been told that their wings don't comply with the rules, and that they have to make changes.
 
Schumacher's future still undecided

Former world champion Michael Schumacher has insisted that he has still not decided whether he wants to stay in Formula One next season, despite reports in Germany suggesting he had agreed a two-year extension to his Ferrari contract.

Ferrari's strong start to the season in Bahrain prompted speculation that Schumacher was already convinced that he wanted to extend his current deal with Ferrari, which runs out at the end of this year.

But speaking after the Malaysian Grand Prix, Schumacher made it clear that he was still biding his time about his future plans.

"From my side, nothing at all has changed, so I am afraid I have nothing to report on that side," he said.

When asked whether his feelings expressed in the winter that he would remain at Ferrari if the F248 was competitive, Schumacher responded: "I am sorry to make you wait, but people should understand if I want to chose the time to make my decision myself."

Schumacher's stance has been backed up by his manager Willi Weber, who claims there is no point even beginning talks with Ferrari until his driver is sure that he wants to stay in F1.

"I'm not holding talks with Ferrari because in order to do that I'd need to know exactly what Michael has on his mind, that is whether he wants to carry on or if he'd rather quit," he was quoted as saying by Gazzetta dello Sport. "At the moment he hasn't decided yet and he won't do so before the summer."

Schumacher's decision will be central to the F1 driver's market, with Ferrari unlikely to pursue other options until they have a definitive answer from the seven-times world champion.

Kimi Raikkonen remains strongly linked with the team, and his decision will almost certainly depend on the relative competitiveness of McLaren and Ferrari this year.

Raikkonen's manager Steve Robertson said that they were also in no rush to decide their future plans - having also been linked to Toyota.

When asked which teams they were speaking to, Robertson said: "I'm not going to be specific, but you don't have to be a genius to work it out.

"We've got time. We're in a strong position. He (Kimi) is the driver everyone wants. Once Kimi and Schumacher are sorted that's when everything else falls into place."
 
CVC gets EU approval but must sell MotoGP

The European Commission has given the go-ahead for a buy-out of Formula One shares by investment firm CVC Capital Partners - but only after the company agreed to get rid of its interests in MotoGP.

CVC announced last November that it, along with Bernie Ecclestone's Bambino Holdings and German bank Bayerische Landesbank, had formed a new company Alpha Prema that will control F1's commercial rights.

But the EU Competition Directorate had to look into the deal to check that it did not give CVC too much influence and be against European competition law. Spanish promotions company Dorna, which is a subsidiary of CVC, owns the commercial rights to MotoGP and other bike racing championships.

After weeks of investigations, the commission felt that CVC having control of both F1 and MotoGP rights would not be good for competition within the EU, so has requested that CVC relinquish its interests in Dorna.

In a statement, the EU said: "The European Commission has cleared under the EU Merger Regulation the proposed acquisition by the private equity investment firm CVC of SLEC, the owner of the Formula One Group.

"The Commission's clearance is conditional upon the divestiture by CVC of its Spanish subsidiary Dorna, which is the promoter of the Moto GP motorcycle Championship. In light of these commitments, the Commission has concluded that the transaction would not significantly impede effective competition in the EEA or any substantial part of it."

The EU feared that control of Formula One and MotoGP rights could reduce competition in the sale of television rights in Spain and Italy, where both championships are popular. There were also fears that the company could force those countries where MotoGP is less popular to buy the rights if they wanted F1.

EU Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said: "When the two most popular motor sport events in the EU, Formula One and Moto GP, come in the hands of one owner, there is a risk of price increases for the TV rights to these events and a reduction in consumer choice. I am satisfied that the commitments given by CVC will eliminate this risk."

The go-ahead by the EU for the CVC deal will be viewed as a landmark for the sport, because it should move it a step closer to heading off the threat of a manufacturer breakaway.

The Grand Prix Manufacturers' Association are hoping to do a deal with CVC that will help secure the future of F1.

McLaren boss Ron Dennis, who has played a central role in many of the discussions within the GPMA, claimed that the CVC green light was vital for the future - even though the sport's commercial package is only one part of the equation.

"I think everybody has agreed that they are of the view that it's all about money," he said at the Bahrain Grand Prix. "Money's all that's talked about in Grand Prix racing. Here, it is very important to understand that this is the future of Grand Prix Racing until at least 2012 and maybe beyond.

"The document which is a memorandum of understanding that is being worked on, at the moment really deals with many issues. I think the discussions that have taken place in the last month really are those that will determine where we push in manner of the long-term interest of F1.

"The buyout by the CVC has been most positively felt because they want stability and also in terms of how we participate in that growth. Now, it's much more of a common interest in terms of how that document is sustained in the long term, so now we are, I will say, more than a day less than a month away, but it will happen in that period of time."
 
Renault to decide on drivers by Monaco GP

Renault team boss Flavio Briatore says the French outfit will decide on their future drivers after May's Monaco Grand Prix.

World champion Fernando Alonso already announced he will leave the team for McLaren at the end of the season, while teammate Giancarlo Fisichella's contract expires at the end of this year.

One of the racing seats is likely to go to current test driver Heikki Kovalainen, who Briatore said last year would be competing with Renault in 2007.

There are several candidates for the other seat and, with Kimi Raikkonen still to announce his plans for the future, the McLaren driver could be a possibility.

Briatore said paying the Finn's salary would not be a problem for Renault, but the Italian admitted there are other considerations to take into account.

"Raikkonen at Renault isn't a matter of money," Briatore told Gazzetta dello Sport. "If I need 10% more Budget, nobody will deny me that.

"Our primary objective is to build a competitive team, but we must not forget that we are making Kovalainen grow and we won't necessarily have to change both drivers.

"We'll take a decision after Monte Carlo."
 
http://journal.autosport.com/2006/mal/cooper.html said:
Wings and a Prayer

The 2006 season began with question marks raised over the rear of the Ferrari car. In Malaysia, the accusations moved to the front. Adam Cooper has been following closely the flexi-wing affair, and he brings a first-hand account, with new details plenty of insight

By Adam Cooper
autosport.com contributing writer

Let me take you back to the 1993 Le Mans 24 Hours, and an earlier chapter in Jean Todt's long career. A classic confrontation between the works Peugeot and Toyota teams is in prospect, and Philippe Alliot has claimed first blood for the French manufacturer by putting his 905B on pole. However, after setting his quick lap time he's had a huge crash in the Porsche Curves, slamming the sleek white machine into a concrete wall.

Back in the paddock, the disappointed mechanics load the crumpled remains into a truck and transport them back to the Paris factory for overnight 'repairs.' It's their only option, since substitution of a T-car means starting from the back of the grid, and the enormous PR value of pole will be lost.

The following day the truck returns, and a pristine car is rolled out. The chassis number matches, and the race organisers are happy that all is well. Alliot's pole is safe. But having seen the original wreck up close, and suspecting foul play, I check with a reliable source inside the team. My 'Deep Throat' confirms with a grin that the team has indeed broken the rules by swapping monocoques. And appears to have got away with it.

Armed with this information I set out to challenge M Todt, at that time the all-powerful competitions boss of Peugeot. Is what his boys have done legal, I venture with a smile? He's a little surprised at first, but soon composes himself.

'If it is considered to be repaired, we 'ave no problem,' he insists. I pursue the matter further, and his blue/grey eyes fix with me a steely glare. 'Are you a policeman?' he asks. 'If you are a policeman, you should be wearing an 'at!'

On Sunday night in Malaysia I was once again wearing my policeman's 'at, and once again, I put Jean Todt to the test...

The gathering storm

But let's start at the beginning. The issue of Ferrari's allegedly flexing rear wing had been gathering momentum even before Bahrain, where members of rival teams expressed their doubts. In the race itself Felipe Massa was fastest through the two quickest speed traps.

In essence, what Ferrari's rivals said happens is that the main element of the rear wing is attached very solidly to the rear crash structure. The rest - the endplates, upper element and so on - has its own fixing. Under high loading at speed this box-like arrangement pivots back, allowing the upper element to close the gap to the lower element. And hey presto, you gain speed on the straight.

The problem for the critics was that, contrary to other evidence, the Ferrari passed the deflection tests applied by the FIA in scrutineering checks.

"I think there are a number of teams wondering where the limits lie," said Renault's Pat Symonds after the race. "There's a single measurement that's made on the wing, but wings have a distributed load, not a single point load. Therefore, the measurement doesn't show everything that can happen with a wing. One place, one direction, can be different to a true aerodynamic load on a wing. It needs a bit of analysis, doesn't it? You ought to be looking at the speed maybe of the Red Bull and the Ferrari, as they've got the same engine..."

He also hit the nail on the head: "You just need to know where you are. It's not a criticism of the FIA. You can't write rules that cover everything. The more precisely you write a rule, the easier it is to get around it. Having them a little bit vague sometimes is not a bad thing."

That summed things up. The FIA has a precise testing method, and the Ferrari had passed it - and such a test is black and white, pregnant or not. But in this case it seemed that there needed to be some grey, some room to be a little bit pregnant.

By Malaysia even Ferrari's closest ally in the paddock wanted answers to the conundrum Symonds posed, and on Friday afternoon Red Bull ran third driver Robert Doornbos with minimal wing compared to the other RB2s, in order to gather some data.

That afternoon Ross Brawn hosted his usual Friday press briefing, and inevitable the wing story came up. He made some interesting remarks about his (and most other people's) approach to the rule book, initially in response to a question about the accuracy of the testing method employed by the FIA.

"It's accurate enough," he insisted. "It's a device, they put a load on it, and they measure the deflection. It's an accurate enough process, and we all have a set of rules that we comply to. Within the spirit of the regulations it's up to the F1 teams to take the maximum advantage as they can from the regulations.

"It's been like that ever since I've been involved in F1, and any team that wants to be competitive has to take that approach. And that's everything. You run within a one kilo of the weight limit. You don't run 10kgs within the weight limit because you want to be safe, you run one kilo within the weight limit.

"The FIA defines how stiff they want the wing to be, and you make it that stiff, or slightly stiffer. And they're entitled to change the regulations any time they want, which may be the case.

"Maybe they decide that the wings are evolving in a way they don't like, and they'll change the regulations again. But that's their prerogative. That's how it's laid out in the regulations, and we may well see some new tests evolve in the next few races. But I think what we have now is accurate."

He confirmed that if the FIA chose to use a different method of testing the rear wing deflection, it could be introduced without warning.

"In theory, they can change that today. The trouble is that if they enforce structural changes to something as critical as a rear wing, it's not a sensible thing to do. If people have to modify the rear wings because they impose a test, and they try to impose that during a race weekend, you've got a situation where a critical component - and a very highly stressed component - could be compromised.

"So I don't think it's very sensible. History shows that they've always done it between races, and given people a couple of weeks to react. I think that's the most likely scenario if they choose to change."

At the time it appeared that he was preparing the ground for a move of goalposts before Australia, and it may well be that there had already been some discussions with the FIA along those lines.

The story takes flight

Then everything turned upside down on Saturday afternoon. The German Premiere TV channel captured on-board shots from a nosecam on the Ferrari, and the commentators could hardly miss the unusual lateral movement of the upper front wing element, which created a gap between itself and the nose. The wide-angle lens may have created some distortion, and one well-informed estimate put it at just 2mm - not much, but a great deal in the rarified world of aerodynamics.

The attention of some teams was drawn to the pictures, and their technical guys told their bosses that there was no way this was right - it was clearly constructed as a movable aerodynamic device, and was not just a question of a piece of material flexing.

What did it do? Some felt that, like the upper rear wing element folding down, it allowed the upper front elements to dip out of the airflow and reduce drag.

One leading technical director, and a man with his feet firmly grounded in reality, had a more complex explanation.

He suggested that the opening gap allowed through a flow of air that helped to balance the car. The rear wing stayed in its down position for high-speed corners, the gap helped to adjust front downforce to match.

Then, for slower corners, the rear wing came up and the closed gap balanced out the front downforce. It certainly sounded like an interesting idea.

Whatever the truth, the reaction was quick. Honda and Renault were particularly incensed, and joined by McLaren, put a plan into action.

At one stage the rumour went round that there would be an FIA 'raid' on the Ferrari garage on Sunday morning - one poor photographer waited in vain for some excitement to happen - but it never did.

The real action took place in a meeting of team principals on Sunday morning, where a consensus was reached. The now infamous letter was composed - with Honda's Nick Fry taking charge - and then signed by eight team principals. Red Bull's Christian Horner and Toro Rosso's Franz Tost opted out for obvious political reasons.

This letter was presented, apparently by a Honda team member, to Charlie Whiting, who in turn passed it to the stewards. In essence it announced the teams' intention to protest.

It was an unprecedented document, without any formal value within the confines of the FIA procedures. For that reason it probably did not particularly impress Whiting - in some ways the hastily readied message was reminiscent of the teams' request for a chicane in Indianapolis last year - but he must have respected its sentiments, as the FIA has harboured doubts about the Ferrari's compliance.

During the morning there were many conversations up and down the paddock involving various combinations of team personnel and Whiting. Bernie Ecclestone was also keeping a close eye on things. I don't know how involved he became, but he was well aware of what was going on: "The teams just want a level-playing field," he told me.

The key event was when Geoff Willis, Pat Symonds and Martin Whitmarsh met Brawn to outline their objections to Ferrari's wing arrangement, and by all accounts, it was a fairly interesting discussion. Brawn refused to concede that the car broke the rules, and maintained that it had passed all the FIA tests - which it had.

As tensions developed, he went for the attack-is-the-best-form-of-defence strategy, producing a dossier outlining alleged infringements on other cars. The fact that he was apparently so well prepared for such a confrontation came as a surprise to the others.

But perhaps the key event of the day was when Jean Todt received a copy of the protest letter - handed to him, we understand, by Flavio Briatore.

Todt didn't need this sort of distraction on the morning of what had already been a very taxing weekend for the team. Anything involving rivals apparently ganging up on Ferrari was bound to agitate him even more, but he now knew how serious the situation had become.

Ferrari give in

The story took a new turn around lunchtime. After the Brawn meeting, and after further discussions with Whiting, who seems to have acted as a kind of broker, Ferrari made some kind of commitment to bring modified wings to the next race in Melbourne.

In turn, the FIA agreed that no further action would be taken in Malaysia pending checks on those revised wings in Melbourne, and the teams agreed not to launch the threatened protest on the same understanding.

I don't know the details of what was said, but I checked and double-checked the basics just before the start of the Malaysian GP with people who should know. Anything else you may have read or heard is probably smokescreen.

Armed with some good inside information, on the grid I spoke to Briatore:

"So Ferrari are going to be good boys?" I said.

"They are going to be good boys in Melbourne!" the Italian replied.

"And you won't protest even if they win today?"

"I gave my word," he shrugged. "It's difficult..."

After the race I asked Nick Fry for his thoughts on Honda's position, and what Ferrari might have agreed to.

"We're clearly uncomfortable with the Ferrari interpretation of the rules," he said. "And that's in common with most of the other teams. They've really got a different understanding of what can be done from anyone else.

"Before the race we got a commitment from Charlie Whiting that there would be a clear interpretation before Melbourne, so we're all playing on a level playing field, and we accepted his word that that will happen. We're expecting by the time we get to Melbourne that we all have a similar or the same understanding of how the rules are written.

"What Ferrari have agreed with Charlie, obviously we're not party to. But I get the impression that there is an understanding that the interpretation of the other teams is the correct one."

It was only fair to give Ross Brawn a chance to put his views across.

"We'll do whatever the FIA ask us to do," he told me. "And the FIA haven't asked us to do anything yet. There's a procedure to follow, and we'll follow the procedure."

He wasn't willing to take a secondary question. However, a few hours after every Grand Prix Jean Todt discussed Ferrari's weekend with the press.

The most infamous of these meetings took place in Malaysia back in 1999, when Todt was joined by Brawn to explain the ins and outs of the bargeboard problem that had just got Eddie Irvine and Michael Schumacher disqualified, and apparently handed the world championships to Mika Hakkinen and McLaren.

Brawn duly held up an offending bargeboard and showed us what was wrong with it, where it had gone astray by 5mm. Of course, events moved on apace in the following days, and suddenly the bargeboard wasn't quite so illegal after all. Some of the people pushing like hell last weekend at Sepang have never quite forgotten what unfolded before the finale in Suzuka 1999...

Anyway, here we were, seven years later, in the very same room or one a couple of doors down. But this time with no bargeboards and no Ross Brawn. Todt talked about the race, and when someone brought up the subject of wings, he echoed Brawn's sentiments about respecting the FIA.

The Colombo question

The Q&A session appeared to be coming to a close, and I waited for my moment before putting on my policeman's 'at. Could I ask a direct question - will you be bringing revised wings to Melbourne? Jean made me repeat it before giving his answer, those steely eyes glancing from side to side rather than fixing me with his usual stare.

"We are not in Melbourne. Ask me the question in Melbourne. Myself, I try to be a manager. I'm not a technical director. So my people know much better, and they will then suggest to me what to do. You must know your limits in life. I try to know mine."

So no deal has been done?

"I would never do a deal with anybody in this business. Only people I contract to work with Ferrari. That's the only deal I do..."

Where do we go from here?

Publicly, Ferrari are still maintaining that 'respect the FIA' line, and in the circumstances I suppose they cannot do anything else. There was of course no way that Todt could have acknowledged on Sunday that there was a deal, and that particular word may not have entered his head in respect of any discussions he had that day.

The Ferrari front wing is said to deflect at high speed © LAT

There was also no way that he could even countenance any suggestion that pressure from other teams - either directly or channelled via the FIA - could have influenced the team's thinking. And that policy will no doubt be maintained, whatever happens in Melbourne.

Equally, rivals have no real wish to stir things up any more. There is even a scenario where Ferrari turn up with revised wings, they are approved by the FIA, the eight teams are satisfied that the job has been done, and no more is heard about it. At the other end of the scale, if they turn up with the same arrangement as seen in Bahrain and Malaysia, all hell will break loose.

The interesting thing will be if there is no further communication from the FIA in the coming days in terms of revised standards of deflection testing and so on. If there is a formal change, then Ferrari can point to the new ruling and say look, the goalposts have moved, the wings we think are legal are no longer so, and we've complied.

On the other hand, what if there isn't a formal change, and they still bring new wings? That can only mean that the team have conceded that what they ran before was not going to be allowed to run again, whatever the results of the standard FIA tests.

I have some sympathy for Ross Brawn, a man I've known for some 16 years, and admire a great deal. As he noted earlier, it's the job of every team's technical leader to push the limits, and he's proved better at that than most. He is adamant that the wings are legal, and can point to the car passing the tests as they are written.

Equally, every technical director knows that sometimes an advantage they've found - even if apparently legal - can be taken away at almost any time. Some teams have spent a lot of money going down development paths that the FIA has very quickly closed off.

There may also been an element of the Al Capone syndrome here. For all his more heinous crimes, the Chicago mobster was finally nailed for tax evasion. Who knows, it may well be that the neatly moving Ferrari front wing serves no useful purpose, but its high profile TV appearance has led directly to the team losing focus of the thing that really did something - the rear wing...

The bigger picture

What happened on Sunday may have avoided a potentially huge mess. Just think of what happened with BAR at Imola last year, and how that saga rumbled on. Far better to catch something early and relatively painlessly. That could have been done with the BAR fuel tank saga; suspicions had been aroused among rival teams (including Ferrari), the FIA was tipped off, and yet nothing happened until the cars finished third and fifth in Imola. Then it all kicked off.

By indicating their intention to protest, the eight teams didn't necessarily expect the response they got on Sunday, but their letter had the effect of defusing the situation - assuming Ferrari do indeed bring different wings to Australia, and everyone is happy. Ferrari will also surely much prefer a quiet, albeit frustrating, end to the affair.

The bottom line is that other teams wanted to know where the line should be drawn in respect of this particular regulation. They had one idea, Ferrari another. Had the latter interpretation been given the OK, everyone else would have pursued the same direction - and I'm not saying that others haven't already explored the margins in this area - and that would not have been a good thing for the sport.

It must be frustrating for the FIA that despite its carefully drawn up testing methods, a car that's legal in the garage is not when running on the track - shades of the Brabham BT49 that Messrs Whiting and Herbie Blash ran all those years ago!

In this very complex area, there has to be scope for new ways of keeping that playing field level, using official cameras and/or a physical method of measuring deflection at high speed.

There may be greater forces at play here, too. The next week or so will be critical for Grand Prix racing, and the whole issue of who will sign up for 2008 remains in the balance. A huge row was not what certain parties needed to see right now. Renault, Honda, McLaren-Mercedes, Toyota and BMW left Malaysia in rather better mood than they otherwise might have. And who knows? Maybe somewhere along the line there will be a benefit for Ferrari.

A final thought. The Scuderia might be on the receiving end this time, but it wasn't always so. Perhaps Ross should take a look at the F399 bargeboard he keeps on display in his office. After all, Malaysia '99 kicked off seven years of good luck...
 
Have just seen the McLaren / BMW wing announcement. It's typical FIA - there's something wrong, fix it. No wonder that no-one trusts them, there's no transparency. What's wrong with saying the wings are illegal because of X, there must be a reason for them to be warning the teams so why not say? Surely if cost cutting is on the agenda it's worth announcing what's wrong with the wings before another team spends 3 weeks of wind tunnel time to come up with a wing that the FIA doesn't like?
 
GPMA welcomes CVC deal clearance

The Grand Prix Manufacturers' Association (GPMA) has welcomed the EU clearance for investment company CVC Capital Partners' takeover of shares in Formula One.

The green light for the move, conditional on CVC ending its involvement in MotoGP, has been viewed by many as key to a deal between the GPMA and Formula One's bosses to secure the future of the sport happening in the near future.

And in a statement issued by the GPMA on Tuesday, the group said it was hopeful that there was enough momentum now for a deal to be sorted out imminently.

"The GPMA manufacturers and their teams welcome and support the EU clearance of the planned acquisition of SLEC by CVC, conditional upon the divestiture of its subsidiary Dorna," said the statement.

"Since CVC announced its intention to acquire SLEC, significant progress in the discussions about the commercial future of Formula One has been made.

"Today's approval was actively supported by the GPMA manufacturers and teams and they are optimistic that it will create additional momentum for the ongoing negotiations."
 
There's another big article on autosport.com in the Weekly Grapevine section, I'll not post the whole thing here because of it's length but there are some interesting points which are worth looking at.

Vodafone seem to be a takeover target for CVC Partners (the new F1 commercial rights holder). Does this have anything to do with McLaren's apparent move towards signing up for F1 in 2008?

CVC is being partnered in the Vodafone takeover by Apax, who own 49% of Prodrive - does this have any relation to David Richards F1 ambitions? If it does everything is going to get very complicated - Prodrive would be partially owned by a company which has a holding in the title sponsorship of another.

Is the situation complex? Certianly. Is it worth keeping an eye on? Definitely!
 
Briatore: Fisichella deserves title
Giancarlo Fisichella is on par with teammate Fernando Alonso and he deserves to win this year's title.

That is the view of Renault team chief Flavio Briatore, who has backed the Italian driver to shine after his disappointing 2005 season.

Fisichella was overshadowed by his younger teammate last season, finishing in fifth place in a championship won by Alonso, who became Formula One's youngest ever champion.

But after Fisichella took a commanding win at the Malaysian Grand Prix last Sunday, Briatore reckons the 33-year-old Roman is ready to fight for the title.

"Fisichella was great since qualifying, then controlled the race perfectly. At his second year in Renault he's developed more faith in us, and we in him," Briatore said. "So, the boy is starting to drive well. Maybe I'll give him a drivers' license.

"I like very much the idea of Giancarlo winning the championship, he deserves it. For me he is completely on par with Fernando."

Briatore has also praised his team after they scored their first one-two in 24 years in Malaysia.

"They wanted to stage our funeral too early," the Italian told Gazzetta dello Sport. "It was enough to change Giancarlo's engine after Bahrain and to see Fernando behind on the grid to consider us finished. Words matter for others, for us only facts.

"In the race we gave an incredible demonstration of strength. McLaren and Ferrari were nowhere compared to us. We took all the points available to us. We can win with any driver. We've demonstrated that Renault can count on two fine drivers, and that we aren't Fernando-dependent at all."

Well two races in and we've had one win each for the Renault drivers, only time will tell if there is any favouritism going on.
 
Ayrton Senna da Silva

Ayrton Senna da Silva, better known as Ayrton Senna, was a Brazilian Formula One triple world champion. Along with his archrival Alain Prost (a four-time World Champion), he is regarded as one of the best drivers of all time. His life, character and the circumstances of his death have caused his story to approach what could arguably be termed a modern legend. A spectacularly talented driver with an unyielding desire to win, Senna was a complex character who fascinated Formula One fans the world over. His death, whilst leading the San Marino Grand Prix at Imola, in 1994 is still mourned, particularly in Brazil.


Early life

Senna was born in São Paulo. As the son of a wealthy Brazilian landowner, he quickly developed an interest in motor racing. Encouraged by his father, a racing enthusiast, Senna got behind the wheel of his first kart at the age of four. He entered karting competition at the legal age of 13. Ayrton Senna himself describes his first ever kart race in a documentary that was made in the early 90s. He described how the circuits were made in regular streets and car parks. Starting positions were pieces of paper mixed in a helmet and were drawn. He mentions drawing the number 1, and therefore being in pole position for his first ever race. The competitors were far more experienced but could not keep up with him on the straights as he was much lighter due to being much younger than they were. He states that they were much better in the corners of course, and eventually someone hit him from behind and he spun off. In 1977, he won the South American Kart Championship, and was runner up several times in the World Championship but never won.

Heading for Europe in 1981, he entered the British Formula Ford 1600 competition, which he won. He also adopted his mother's maiden name, Senna, as da Silva is a very common name in Brazil. In 1982 Senna combined the British and European Formula Ford 2000 Championships, winning both. In addition to winning the prestigious and high-profile Macau Grand Prix, Ayrton saw off the challenges of Martin Brundle in the 1983 British F3 championship, and after testing with Williams, McLaren, Brabham and Toleman, he managed to secure a seat with the latter in time for the 1984 Formula One season.


Into Formula One

The Toleman team was small in comparison to the big teams of that time like Williams, McLaren, or Brabham. Despite this, the team built a decent car powered by Hart Turbo engines and it was to be in this car where Senna's talents soon started to attract notice. He scored his first World Championship point on April 7, 1984 at the South African Grand Prix at Kyalami. Three races and two points later came the high watermark of Senna's debut season when he really impressed at the Monaco GP. Rain had plagued the event come Sunday where he started 13th on the grid, but after the start of the race, he soon was picking his way through the field in the wet on a circuit not known for overtaking in the dry. By Lap 19, he passed second place man (and future World Champion) Niki Lauda and soon chased after race leader Alain Prost. However, the rain started lashing harder and on Lap 31 the race was stopped. (This would have unfortunate consequences for Prost. Half points for a win was less than full points for the second place he would have earned if the event had continued to two-thirds distance, enough to be counted full race. Few doubt Senna would have got by him.) It was an impressive first podium for the Brazilian. Two more podium finishes (thirds) would follow at the British GP at Brands Hatch and at the season-ending Portuguese GP at Estoril, ultimately placing Senna ninth in the standings, tied with Nigel Mansell on 13 points.


The Lotus Years

The next year, Senna joined the Lotus team powered with Renault engines (albeit in a bit of controversy as he had to buy out the remaining year in his Toleman contract) and it was expected that Senna would finally be able to deliver on his promising talent. He scored his first of a record setting 65 pole positions at the season opener in Brazil at the Jacarepagua Circuit in Rio De Janeiro, only to retire with an electrical problem. However, at the second round in Estoril, Portugal on April 21, 1985, he finally scored his first Grand Prix victory, winning from pole position thanks to an impressive display of wet-weather driving in treacherous conditions which even saw second-place man (and later World Champion) Alain Prost spin off into the wall. However, the remainder of his 1985 season was plagued with mechanical failures despite his outright speed and his ability to score pole position after pole position during qualifying. He only managed another win at the Belgian GP at the famous Spa-Francorchamps circuit (once again in wet conditions). At the end of 1985, he finished a respectable 4th in the World Championship with 38 points and four podiums (two seconds and two thirds), as well as snatching seven pole positions. It was during these years that he also established a relationship with Bernie Ecclestone. A famous account is at Spa, where Bernie was standing very close to the guardrail at a very fast corner. Lap after lap Senna would edge his car closer and closer to the barrier to "test" the courage of Ecclestone. Ecclestone later described how incredible he had found Senna's car control as he ended up tapping the barrier with the tyres at 320km/h lap after lap.

His second season with Lotus however was even better, as the new Lotus-Renault proved to be a more reliable if not consistent package. He started the season on a high finishing second to his fellow countryman Nelson Piquet at their home event, the Brazilian GP at Jacarepagua in Rio de Janeiro. Then he took the World Championship lead for the first time in his career after winning an exciting Spanish GP at the Jerez de la Frontera circuit in which he managed to hold off the menacing Nigel Mansell in his Williams-Honda for the victory by just .014 of a second. He would not last there for long however as the Championship would ultimately become a straight fight between Alain Prost's McLaren-TAG-Porsche and the Williams-Honda duo of Piquet and Mansell; key retirements due to mechanical failures once again befell his chase for the Title. Despite this though, Senna still went on a strong charge, taking his second victory of the year at the United States GP at Detroit, and finishing the season fourth (again) with 55 points, 8 pole positions and six podium finishes (four seconds and two thirds).

1987 came with as much promise for better things as it had before. Lotus had now the powerful Honda engines after Renault decided to step out of the sport. After a slow start, Senna won two races in a row: The prestigious Monaco GP (the first of a record breaking six victories at the Principality) and the United States GP at Detroit for the second year in a row, once again taking the World Championship lead. This time, the Lotus-Honda seemed to be more or less on par with the all-conquering Williams-Honda cars once again driven by fellow countryman Nelson Piquet and Nigel Mansell. But Piquet had an amazing run of consistency throughout the year that Senna was not able to match, and after a spin due to a faulty clutch in the third to last round in Mexico, he was out of the championship hunt, leaving Piquet and teammate Mansell to fight it out for the last two races. Alas, Mansell badly bruised his back in an accident while practicing for the Japanese Grand Prix at Suzuka, which effectively handed the World Championship to Piquet since he would be out of the season-ending race at Australia in Adelaide as well. However, this meant that Senna still had a fighting chance to snatch the runner-up position in the standings if he managed to finish at least third in both remaining races, and he did more than that by finishing second in both Japan and Australia. Unfortunately at Australia, scrutineering found the brake ducts of his Lotus-Honda to be wider than what they should legally be and he was disqualified, bringing his last and ultimately best season with Lotus to a sour end. After the disqualification, he ended third in the Final Standings, with 57 points, 1 pole position, and 6 podium finishes (four seconds, not counting the one in which he was disqualified, and two thirds). However, this season would mark the turning point of his career as throughout the year, Senna began to build a deep relationship with Honda, a relationship which would pay off in big dividends once his contract with Lotus expired at the end of the season and once the McLaren team soon started calling.


McLaren career

In 1988, thanks to the relationship he had built up with Honda throughout the 1987 season with Lotus, and with the approval of McLaren's #1 driver, Alain Prost, Senna joined the McLaren team with then-two-time World Champion Alain Prost as his team mate. The foundation for a fierce competition between Senna and Prost was laid, culminating in a number of dramatic race incidents between the two. The pair won 15 of 16 races in 1988 (The Italian GP was the one not won by McLaren) with Senna coming out on top, achieving his first World Drivers Championship. The following year their rivalry intensified into battles on the track and a psychological war off it. Prost took the championship after the infamous Suzuka chicane incident, where their two cars tangled Prost as Senna attempted to overtake. If neither McLaren finished, Prost was world champion. In 1993 Prost admitted that he had knowingly not moved aside as he had seen Senna approach. Prost supporters may say that Prost had the inside line, while Senna supporters may say that Senna's car was ahead and that Prost appeared to actually turn slightly towards Senna causing the cars to lock together and go off the circuit, across the chicane. Senna managed to get back to the pits for a new nose cone, rejoined the race, retook the lead and won the race, only to be disqualified for illegally cutting the chicane. At the Suzuka circuit in 1990, the pole position was located on the right, 'dirty' side of the track. Senna maintained that, before qualifying fastest, he had sought and received assurances from officials that pole position would be on the left, clean side of the track, only to find this decision reversed after he had taken pole. At the start of the race Prost pulled ahead but when attempting to take the first right-handed corner he was hit by Senna. Telemetry showed Senna made no attempt to decelerate as the corner approached. Both drivers were removed from the race, meaning that Senna won the championship. Senna later admitted that it was payback for Prost taking them both out the year before in the 1989 Suzuka chicane incident. For critics, it was an act of breathtaking cynicism and one for which Senna received much criticism. He was accused by some of introducing a "video game" mentality of "win at all costs" into the sport, an accusation later repeated against his successor Michael Schumacher. On the track Senna could be ruthless, showing at times extreme determination and precision.

Senna was most renowned for his qualifying skill, a discipline he mastered like none before to produce a record 65 pole positions out of 161 races. This record stood for 12 years after his death, before it was equaled by Michael Schumacher while qualifying for the 2006 Bahrain Grand Prix, his 234th race.

"Magic" Senna, as he was known to his fans, also won the Monaco GP six times, a record in itself and a tribute to his skills which earned him the title "Master of Monaco".

Senna's absolute determination to win manifested itself in dismay at McLaren's inability to challenge Williams in 1992. With Prost signed up by the Grove based squad for 1993 and possessing a veto over Senna joining him, Ayrton considered a sabbatical from F1. He tested for Marlboro Team Penske in Indycars, setting swift times and exciting the motoring press. Of course, this test was but a one-off, but the prospect of both Senna and Mansell racing Indycars in 1993 was a brilliant scenario.


Wet weather driving

In F1, wet weather racing is considered to be a great equaliser. Speeds must be reduced and car superiority in power or grip is eliminated. The rain demands great driver car control, ability and driving finesse. Senna is widely considered one of the best, if not the best driver ever in wet weather.

The 1984 season was Senna's first in F1. He came into a field of competitors from whose ranks 16 world championships would be reaped. Participating as an unknown rookie in a low level, non competitive car, the Toleman TG184, Senna had racked up three 16th places and a 13th place.

He started the first wet race of the season, the Monaco Grand Prix (a notoriously difficult circuit for racing, as it is run on regular streets) in 13th place. The race was terminated after 31 laps due to monsoon conditions deemed undriveable. At the time the race was stopped, Senna was classified in 2nd place, and catching up to race leader Alain Prost, at 4 seconds per lap. Senna's performance in this race, on a track on which it is notoriously difficult to pass other competitors, should be contrasted with the events of recent races at Monaco in which passing has been the exception rather than the norm, especially in dry conditions.

In 1993, at the European GP at Donington Park, Senna drove for the McLaren team. The MP4/8, although one of the front running cars, was considered inferior to the leading Williams FW-15C of Prost, and the Benetton B193 (which used a factory Ford engine) driven by Michael Schumacher and Riccardo Patrese. Some maintain that the Williams FW-14B and FW-15C were probably "the most technologically advanced cars that will ever race in Formula One".[1]

The start of the wet-weather 1993 European Grand Prix, by way of its uniqueness, is frequently referred to in racing lore as the best-ever lap. Senna was fifth going into the first corner, having nearly been pushed off the track by a swerving Schumacher. At the end of the first lap, having passed F1 champions with a cumulative world championship total of 12, he was first. Having overtaken Schumacher, Wendlinger, Hill and Prost he went on to lap the entire field. Examples of wet weather car control such as this gained Senna the title "The Rain Master" in numerous F1 publications in the early 90's.


Character

Starkly contrasting to Senna's intense and unyielding will to win on the track, his exploits off it were humane and compassionate. He was renowned for his close relationship with Gerhard Berger, and the two were always playing practical jokes on each other.

In 1992 at Spa-Francorchamps in Belgium when during Friday free practise Erik Comas had crashed heavily on the back straight other drivers drove past the wreckage at high speed. Senna could be seen jumping out of his car and while endangering his own life, sprinting down the track to the wrecked car to reach inside and hit the electrics kill switch, to prevent a possible fire.

In 1993 again at Spa-Francorchamps when Alessandro Zanardi crashed his Lotus heavily at Eau Rouge corner, Senna could again be seen jumping out of his car to help the injured driver.

Fellow Brazillian F1 driver Mauricio Gugelmin tells of an episode in 1988 where Senna and Nelson Piquet, another champion, had developed an altercation. It had started when tongue-in-cheek remarks made by Senna to a reporter had been taken out of context. Having been asked why he had not been readily available to the press for a few weeks, Senna had responded that, as Piquet had just been crowned World Champion he had receded to give the press time to talk about Piquet. Piquet, who was infuriated by these comments, told the press to ask Ayrton why he did not like women. Mauricio Gugelmin expands: "He [Senna] was at my house when they called and told him Piquet's answer, wanting more of him. Even my wife was angry with that and said to him: 'Ayrton, tell them to ask Piquet's wife if it is true', referring to Catherine, who was Ayrton's girl before Nelson's. And Ayrton refused: 'No, I don't do this. If he doesn't respect anybody, I do. I don't do this to any woman.'"

After Senna's death it was discovered that he had donated millions of dollars to children's charities, a fact that he during his life, had kept secret.
 
Death

In 1994, Senna finally left the ailing McLaren team for the top team at the end of 1993 Williams-Renault. After the banning of active suspension Williams started the season trying to close the gap to Benetton. Senna failed to finish his first two races, despite taking two superb pole positions against the Benetton at both events. On May 1 1994, he took part in his third race for the team, the San Marino GP. Senna took pole position yet again, but would not finish the race.

That weekend, he was particularly upset by two events: On the Friday of the Grand Prix, during the morning session, Senna's protégé, the then newcomer Rubens Barrichello was involved in a serious accident that would keep him out of the race. Senna visited Barrichello in the hospital (he jumped the wall in the back of the facility after being barred from visitation by the doctors) and was then convinced that safety standards had to be reviewed. On Saturday, the death of driver Roland Ratzenberger in practice forced the issue and even caused Senna to consider retiring. Ironically, he spent his final morning in meetings with fellow drivers, determined by Ratzenberger's accident to take on a new responsibility to re-create a Driver's Safety group to look at safety changes in Formula One. As the most senior driver, he was asked (and accepted) the role of leader in this effort.

A crash at the start of the race involving Pedro Lamy and J. J. Lehto (in which a stray wheel hit spectators in the grandstand) caused the caution flag to wave, and Senna was leading the race after a decent start kept him ahead of Michael Schumacher, the young German. Because of the fact that the drivers were behind the safety car, the pressures in the tyres were reduced, when Senna crashed, it was because the bottom of his car touched the road, and the steering column broke, giving him a lack of steering. But on the second lap after the restart, Senna's car left the track in Tamburello and struck an unprotected concrete wall. Telemetry shows he left the track at 193 mph and managed to slow the car to 135 mph in less than two seconds but it was not enough. After Senna's car had come to a halt false hopes were raised when his head was clearly seen to move slightly. Professor Sidney Watkins M.D., F.R.C.S., O.B.E. a world-renowned neurosurgeon and Formula One Safety Delegate and Medical Delegate, head of the Formula One on-track medical team, who performed an on site tracheotomy on Ayrton Senna, reported:

"He looked serene. I raised his eyelids and it was clear from his pupils that he had a massive brain injury. We lifted him from the cockpit and laid him on the ground. As we did, he sighed and, although I am totally agnostic, I felt his soul departed at that moment."

Senna was 34 years old. The lack of information on the cause of death led to much speculation. What is known is that the front right tyre with attached suspension piece became loose on impact, hit Senna on the head and pierced his visor, causing the fatal trauma. Images of Senna's battered helmet indicate that some sort of puncture had occurred at the top of the visor, just over his right eye. This led to the now most commonly accepted theory that one of the car's suspension bars had come loose and impacted with Senna's head.

The FIA and Italian authorities still maintain that Senna was not killed instantly, but rather died in hospital, to where he had been rushed by helicopter after an emergency tracheotomy and IV administration were performed. There is an ongoing debate as to why Senna was not declared dead at the track. Under Italian law when a person dies at a sporting event, that death must be investigated, causing the sporting event to be cancelled. The Director of the Oporto (Portugal) Legal Medicine Institute, Professor Pinto da Costa, has stated the following

"From the ethical viewpoint, the procedure used for Ayrton's body was wrong. It involved dysthanasia, which means that a person has been kept alive improperly after biological death has taken place due to brain injuries so serious that the patient would never have been able to remain alive without mechanical means of support. There would have been no prospect of normal life and relationships. Whether or not Ayrton was removed from the car while his heart was beating or whether his supply of blood had halted or was still flowing, is irrelevant to the determination of when he died.

The autopsy showed that the crash caused multiple fractures at the base of the cranium, crushing the forehead and rupturing the temporal artery with hammerhead in the respiratory passages. It is possible to resuscitate a dead person immediately after the heart stops through cardio-respiratory processes. The procedure is known as putting the patient on the machine. From the medical-legal viewpoint, in Ayrton's case, there is a subtle point: resuscitation measures were implemented.

From the ethical point of view this might well be condemned because the measures were not intended to be of strictly medical benefit to the patient but rather because they suited the commercial interest of the organisation. Resuscitation did in fact take place, with the tracheotomy performed, while the activity of the heart was restored with the assistance of cardio-respiratory devices. The attitude in question was certainly controversial. Any physician would know there was no possibility whatsoever of successfully restoring life in the condition in which Senna had been found."

Professor Jose Pratas Vital, Director of the Egas Moniz hospital in Lisbon, a neurosurgeon and Head of the Medical Staff at the Portuguese GP, offers a different opinion:

"The people who conducted the autopsy stated that, on the evidence of his injuries, Senna was dead. They could not say that. He had injuries which lead to his death, but at that point the heart may still have been functioning. Medical personnel attending an injured person, and who perceive that the heart is still beating, have only two courses of action:

One is to ensure that the patient's respiratory passages remain free, which means that he can breathe. They had to carry out an emergency tracheotomy. With oxygen, and the heart beating, there is another concern, which is loss of blood. These are the steps to be followed in any case involving serious injury, whether on the street or on a racetrack. The rescue team can think of nothing else at that moment except to assist the patient, particularly by immobilising the cervical area. Then the injured person must be taken immediately to the intensive care unit of the nearest hospital".

Rogério Morais Martins [Micropower] states that:

"According to the first clinical bulletin read by Dr. Maria Teresa Fiandri at 4.30 p.m. Ayrton Senna had brain damage with haemorrhaged shock and deep coma. However, the medical staff did not note any chest or abdomen wound. The hammerhead was due to the rupture of the temporal artery. The neurosurgeon who examined Ayrton Senna at the hospital mentioned that the circumstances did not call for surgery because the wound was generalised in the cranium. At 6.05 p.m. Dr. Fiandri read another communiqué, her voice shaking, announcing that Senna was dead. At that stage he was still connected to the equipment that maintained his heartbeat.

The release by the Italian authorities of the results of Ayrton Senna's autopsy, revealing that the driver had died instantaneously during the race at Imola, ignited still more controversy. Now there were questions about the reactions of the race director and the medical authorities. Although spokespersons for the hospital had stated that Senna was still breathing on arrival in Bologna, the autopsy on Ratzenberger [who died the day before] indicated that death had been instantaneous. Under Italian law, a death within the confines of the circuit would have required the cancellation of the entire race meeting.

That in turn, would have prevented the death of Ayrton Senna.

The relevant Italian legislation stipulates that when a death takes place during a sporting event, it should be immediately halted and the area sealed off for examination. In the case of Ratzenberger, this would have meant the cancellation of both Saturday's qualifying session and the San Marino Grand Prix on Sunday.

Medical experts are unable to state whether or not Ayrton Senna died instantaneously. Nevertheless, they were well aware that his chances of survival were slight. Had he remained alive, the brain damage would have left him severely handicapped. Accidents such as this are almost fatal, with survivors suffering irreversible brain damage. This is due to the effects on the brain of sudden deceleration, which causes structural damage to the brain tissues. Estimates of the forces involved in Ayrton's accident suggest a rate of deceleration equivalent to a 30 metre vertical drop, landing head-first. Evidence offered at the autopsy revealed that the impact of this 208km/h crash caused multiple injuries at the base of the cranium, resulting in respiratory insufficiency.

There was crushing of the brain (which was forced against the wall of the cranium causing oedema and hammerhead, increasing intra-cranial pressure and causing brain death), together with the rupture of the temporal artery, hammerhead in the respiratory passages and the consequent heart failure.

There are two opposing theories on the issue of whether the drivers were still alive when they were put in the helicopters that carried them to hospital. Assuming both Ratzenberger and Senna had died instantaneously, the race organisers might have delayed any announcement in order to avoid being forced to cancel the meeting, thus protecting their financial interests.

Had the meeting been cancelled, Sagis - the organisation which administers the Imola circuit - stood to lose an estimated US$6.5 million."

The FIA dismisses that conception as an unfounded conspiracy theory.

The Autodromo Enzo e Dino Ferrari in Imola was immediately investigated by the FIA, and the track's signature Tamburello, a lightning rod of controversy because of the lack of run-off and two previous incidents – Piquet's 1987 crash in Friday practice caused by a tyre failure, which kept him out of the race, forced Goodyear to withdraw all tyres after the first practice, and replace tyres for Saturday's qualifying session. Two years later, Gerhard Berger's Ferrari was in flames after another tyre failure early in the race, surviving because of alert safety workers. But Senna's death meant the end of the sweeper, and it was replaced by a chicane in 1995.

In 2000, he was posthumously inducted into the International Motorsports Hall of Fame.

In 2004, a television documentary by National Geographic called Seconds from disaster: The death of Ayrton Senna was screened worldwide. The programme considered the available data from Senna's car to reconstruct the sequence of events that led to the fatal crash. The programme concluded that an unusually long safety car period had reduced the pressures in Senna's tyres, thereby lowering the car. As the car entered the Tamburello bend, it bottomed-out and the loss of the ground effect led to a sudden reduction in downforce, and hence grip. As Senna instinctively corrected the resultant slide, the downforce and grip suddenly returned, and Senna effectively drove off the circuit. The programme came to the conclusion that if Senna's reactions had actually been slower, he might have survived the crash. To many within the F1 world including drivers of that era who had raced at Imola, the conclusions drawn from low tyre pressure as a cause of the accident seem highly implausible. Telemetry recorded that Senna took the bend at 190mph on lap 6 with cold tyres. Alboreto and other drivers of the era claimed that given his lap time, his tyres would have been at race temperature by the 7th lap and it was not a factor in the crash.

The ban on active suspension affected Williams more than any other team as it was the key development that had helped make the Williams car the class of the field from 1991-1993. 1994 started with the Williams drivers complaining of severe handling problems and a twitchy rear-end. The FW16 new rear end was introduced at Imola. It was ironic that at the beginning of 1994 Senna himself had told the press that he would be surprised if there would be no large accidents that year. Referring to the fact that after the wide "white label" 26" Goodyear slicks were banned for 1993 (replaced by "yellow label"), now the technology at the very core of the cars, the science around which they had been based for the last few years; (Active suspension, traction control and ABS) were also banned for 1994. He surmised that the cars would have trouble staying on the road, which is exactly what was observed at the beginning of 1994, J.J. Lehto damaging his vertebrae at Silverstone in January, Lamy breaking both knee-caps at the same track in May, Alesi breaking his neck in preseason testing, Ratzenberger and Senna's fatal accidents at Imola, the race after at Monaco, Wendlinger comatose for months and Ratzenbergers replacement, Montermini breaking his feet in the Simtek in Barcelona. None of these accidents were deemed to be caused by driver error.

There are other factors – Senna did not like the position of the steering column relative to his seating position and had repeatedly asked for it to be changed. At Imola Senna found himself in a car with his team's engineers struggling to cope and adapt to the ban of active suspension. Patrick Head and Adrian Newey agreed to Senna's request to shorten the FW-16's wheelbase, but there was no time to manufacture a shortened steering shaft. The existing shaft was instead cut, shortened, and welded back together with reinforcing plates. Many surmise, based on comparing hours of onboard video footage from Brazil and Imola that the movement of the steering wheel during the race at Imola was completely abnormal. Senna on his final lap is seen turning the wheel left to full lock with no movement of the front wheels. Others have raised suspicion at what can clearly be seen on the onboard footage as Senna looking down onto his steering wheel seconds before entering Tamburello.

Senna's helmet

Damon Hill, Senna's teammate at the time of his death, had this to say in an interview given on the subject 10 years later.

"After the warm-up we went to the drivers' briefing. Ayrton was upbeat and determined after his good performance, but he had concerns about the new safety car regulations. These fears were to be prophetic. It was a measure of the political climate of Formula One that A. S. felt it necessary to get other drivers to ask questions about the safety car so that he did not appear to be alone. The implication was that the bosses made the rules; if you had issues with that, they would make sure you knew who ran things. So we got on to the subject of the safety car (importantly distinct from the "pace car" used to spice up US racing).

Ayrton became vociferous, claiming that it was ill-conceived and dangerous for one specific reason — the temperature of the tyres of a Formula One car is critical in several respects. One, they only stick when they are very hot; two, the pressure varies enormously with temperature and, consequently, the stability of the tyre construction.

To sum up: if a Formula One car has to follow an ordinary road car it will not travel fast enough for the tyres to keep within their designed working temperature and pressure. I believe this was a contributing factor in Ayrton's accident, as the safety car was deployed directly after the start, exactly as he had feared.

And so it was we left the briefing on Sunday having agreed to pay some kind of tribute to Roland on the grid. We went to the normal sponsor functions and then back to the motorhome. I never really talked or spent any time with Ayrton before the race. Everything was extremely businesslike, with an added severity because of the death of Roland."

The Williams team was entangled for many years in a court case with the Italian prosecutors over manslaughter charges, but they were found not guilty and no action was taken against Williams. In 2004, the case was re-opened, but closed again in 2005 when there was no new evidence.

His death was considered by many of his Brazilian fans to be a national tragedy, and three days of national mourning were declared. Senna is buried at the Cemitério do Morumbi in his hometown of São Paulo.


Legacy

Off the track, Senna was a deeply religious and compassionate man. After his death, his family created the Ayrton Senna Foundation, an organization with the aim of helping poor and needy young people in Brazil and around the world. As a result, Senna continues to impact the world today and has become a beacon of hope to millions of his countrymen and an example of professionalism and humanity to those who remember him.

In 2004 (when, ten years after his death, the Brazilian media revisited the entire life of Senna), a book called "Ayrton: The Hero Revealed" (original title: "Ayrton: O Herói Revelado") was published in Brazil. The book recalls several passages of Senna's career, and adds a lot of never written before information about his personal life. As the title suggests, the book "reveals" the human side of a hero.

As well, to mark the 10th anniversary of Senna's passing, on April 21, 2004, over 10,000 people attended a charity match in a soccer stadium near Imola. The game was organized by several devoted Italian and Canadian fans of Ayrton, bringing together the 1994 World Cup winning team of Brazil to face the "Nazionale Piloti", an exhibition team comprised exclusively of top race car drivers (of which Senna was a part in 1985). Michael Schumacher, Jarno Trulli, Rubens Barrichello, Fernando Alonso and many others faced the likes of Dunga, Careca, Taffarel and many of the team that won the World Cup in the USA ten years earlier.

That same weekend, Bernie Ecclestone revealed that he still believed Ayrton Senna was and remained the best F1 driver he'd ever seen.

Perhaps the unique duality of his character was most evident at the moment of his death. As track officials examined the wreckage of his racing car they found a furled, bloodsoaked Austrian flag. A victory flag that he was going to raise in honour of Austrian Roland Ratzenberger, who had died on that track the day before.

At his memorial service one million people lined the streets to give him their salute.


Notable quotes
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit and you go for this limit and you touch this limit and you think, ok, this is the limit. As soon as you touch this limit, something happens and you realise that you can suddenly go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and your experience as well, you can fly very high."

"Being second, is to be the first of the ones who lose."

"Racing, competing, it's in my blood. It's part of me, it's part of my life; I have been doing it all my life and it stands out above everything else."

"It's going to be a season with lots of accidents, and I'll risk saying that we'll be lucky if something really serious doesn't happen." - pre-season 1994.


Ayrton Senna – F1 record
Nationality:
Brazilian

Active years:
1984 - 1994

Teams:
Toleman Hart, Lotus, McLaren, Williams

Race starts:
161

Championships:
3

Wins:
41

Podium finishes:
80

Pole positions:
65

Fastest laps:
19

First Grand Prix:
1984 Brazilian Grand Prix

First win:
1985 Portuguese Grand Prix

Last win:
1993 Australian Grand Prix

Last Grand Prix:
1994 San Marino Grand Prix


senna1.jpg


senna2.jpg


senna3.jpg


senna4.jpg



The reason for all this?

Today would have been Ayrton Senna's 46th birthday.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom