and clearly not ahead when he decides he is too good to lift and cuts the track
So one minute you are saying he is not ahead, the next you say he is, trolling for anything specific?
and clearly not ahead when he decides he is too good to lift and cuts the track
Fair enough, then the argument becomes consitency. In the Alonso case, he had to give the place back to Klien again, yet the stewards at Spa gave Hamilton a drive through (applied post race as a 25 seconds penalty).
Surely they should use precedents and just drop him a place? Or am I just being silly and using common sense?
Neither did Hamilton from cutting the corner.
do you only watch f1 on the news or something?
he gained an advantage his move in turn 1 only came about due to him cutting the chicane or he would not have been close
So one minute you are saying he is not ahead, the next you say he is, trolling for anything specific?
do you only watch f1 on the news or something?
he gained an advantage his move in turn 1 only came about due to him cutting the chicane or he would not have been close
This is particularly strange, tell me why he wouldnt have been close when entering the complex he is more than close enough already?or he would not have been close
So, what advantage is this that you speak of, because as far as I can see Hamilton entering the complex in front on the outside results in him behind again on the straight.
So at Belgium they are simply applying the rules they have used in the past, except all the Hamilton fans can't seem to understand he had a major advantage being right behind Kimi which he wouldn't have had if he didn't cut the corner.
because he is out of track thats why maybe?
if there was a gravel trap on his left he would have backed off
he is not ahead at all
watch the video kimi is ahead
Apart from the various extra feeds i get at work you mean? Hamilton was consistantly catching KR for the previous 5 laps, he was close enough to make a move when he did and KR forced him off [like he tried with massa]
He then gave the position back to KR and charlie whiting was happy with it
What part of that didnt you see?
watch the video? much better
he lost the corner he should have lifted
he decided he is above the rules and cut the chicane to set up a pass into turn 1 its not hard to understand for most people
2) Hamilton didnt decide he is above the rules. The rules are that if you gain an advantage from cutting the corner (which in this case there were two options imposed by KR himself, cut the corner or hit me) you let your opponent back through. Hamilton did this, I dont see how you can dispute that?
3rd option back off accept your move failed and go for it at the next chance
he decided to cut the track he could easily have made the corner but he did not want to lose the time it would have cost him
Which is what Hamilton did do, and got passed at La Source.TheStig1 said:3rd option back off accept your move failed and go for it at the next chance
I could say the exact same thing about Raikonnen's move around Pouhon.TheStig1 said:he decided to cut the track he could easily have made the corner but he did not want to lose the time it would have cost him
He would have. Did you not notice he was right on Kimi's backside coming into the chicane. If he hadn't tried the move, had stayed on kimi and followed him through, he would have slipstreamed him down the full straight (rather than having to do a 1/3 of it not on full throttle) and beat Kimi into La Source anyway.major advantage being right behind Kimi which he wouldn't have had if he didn't cut the corner.