Are there any parts of this forum where people like you? I've yet to see one.
fail to see what that has to do with the belgian gp?
i dont post an opinion to be liked im not that needy
Are there any parts of this forum where people like you? I've yet to see one.
Lewis could not just lift off, he had two options when Kimi squeezed him - go over the grass, and potentially take both cars out, or use the run off. Dozens of cars have taken evasive action across run off areas this year alone (with no penalty).
Lewis did not draft Kimi down to turn one. He was only behind the Ferrari for a fraction of a second.
Also, use punctuation - as said before, it makes your posts very hard to read.
Man the amount of Hamilton bum love in this thread is amazing.. He cut the corner instead of lifting off and gained an advantage. Had he took the corner, he wouldnt have been glued to Raikkonens gearbox before La Source. End of. /thread.
so you are saying if there was a wall on his left he would not have been able to lift?
course he could lift to suggest he cant is just in denial and its the whole basis of why he was punished
No, if there was a wall there he would have crashed.
Which is exactly why there IS a run off area. Why on earth has the FIA put tarmac run off areas across and around all the corners if you can't use them?!
The FIA said:2008 FORMULA ONE SPORTING REGULATIONS
30) GENERAL SAFETY
30.3 a) During practice and the race, drivers may use only the track and must at all times observe the provisions of the Code relating to driving behaviour on circuits.
and
International Sporting Code
CHAPTER IV - CODE OF DRIVING CONDUCT ON CIRCUITS
2. Overtaking
g) The race track alone shall be used by the drivers during the race.
Incidentaly - is everyone in the thread aware that it's not the "gaining advantage" that Hamilton has been pulled up for.
The actual, specific rule breach on the FIA's document state he was penalised for breaching:
So he's actually been penalised for leaving the track. Nothing else. These are the 2 rule breaches quoted by the FIA.
I did, I took screenshots of it remember? You probably didnt look at them because they display Kimi not leaving enough space for a car to stay there.ah resorting to insults because you cant handle the truth
how about you pause the incident at the moment lewis decides he is too good to use the race track
Despite your belief that Hamilton has some magical brakes that allow an F1 car to stop immediately this just isnt possible. I showed you the video, I pointed out at 16.7 seconds he is trying to get back in behind the Ferrari, but what I can only assume is a disability is stopping you from seeing this.at that moment had he been fair he would have lifted off and accepted kimi defended his lead very well and lost maybe 3/4 tenths getting himself out of the problem he was in and get back onto the racing line and no longer in any position to draft kimi down to turn 1 as he did
If Hamilton had stayed in front there would be crying Italians throwing their toys out of their prams all over the world. He gave the position back, didnt slipstream and outbroke KR into the next corner, only possible due to KR's conservative braking and decision to move to the outside and cut back in.he however decided not to accept that and took a short cut that saved him the lost time from kimi defending and set himself up to make another pass due to cutting the track
Advantage?! ADVANTAGE?! When will you realise that letting someone back past you is not an advantage? You dont see Massa going round letting everyone overtake him and saying "LOOK AT ME IVE GOT THE ADVANTAGE".. letting your opponent cross the line faster and gain a full cars length infront is not an advantage considering both cars entered the complex side by side if not with Hamilton in front.if you do not call that an advantage then your just being silly for the sake of it
I would say this is your only redeeming factor, if the situation were the same. The fact of the matter is, Alonso uses the slipstream of Klien I believe, for a long time down a long straight. Hamilton slipstreams for how long? And overtakes on the 1st corner for what reason?alonso at suzuka 05 did the same thing as lewis and he got collared so why the big fuss just cause its lewis getting told to stick to the rules
So he gave the place back, because he learnt in France to respect the rules and play by them or be penalised. Now it seems LH has to learn a new lesson. Never leave the track, even if you are going to cause an accident, because its better to hit KR than do the safe thing. Oh wait.. Or maybe the lesson is, dont try and win. Or maybe the lesson is if KR leaves the track and gains momentum into a turn and gets back in front while you have to go on the grass (which he should learn is probably an advantage and use the grass at all tracks) that nothing will happen to KR, so dont bother trying to overtake.yes because he overtook by not using the race track
same in france
yes because he overtook by not using the race track
same in france
Oh god... read the post and stated breached regulations!
HE WAS PENALISED FOR GOING OVER THE CHICANE NOT OVERTAKING!
If its even possible this is only more ridiculous. With all of Max's safety spiel its now the fact that going over a run off area is worse than hitting another car..
Despite your belief that Hamilton has some magical brakes that allow an F1 car to stop immediately this just isnt possible.
Oh god... read the post and stated breached regulations!
HE WAS PENALISED FOR GOING OVER THE CHICANE NOT OVERTAKING!
HE WAS PENALISED FOR GOING OVER THE CHICANE NOT OVERTAKING!
Incidentaly - is everyone in the thread aware that it's not the "gaining advantage" that Hamilton has been pulled up for.
The actual, specific rule breach on the FIA's document state he was penalised for breaching:
So he's actually been penalised for leaving the track. Nothing else. These are the 2 rule breaches quoted by the FIA.