Soldato
You don't know what pain I go through every morning ......
Work monitors are 2 x 1280x1024 - FML and F it again
***21.9 Ultrawide Thread***
- Thread starter Nexus18
- Start date
You don't know what pain I go through every morning ......
Work monitors are 2 x 1280x1024 - FML and F it again
WoW natively ran at 3440x1440 for me.
Great news, what was it like? I currently game at 16:10
You don't know what pain I go through every morning ......
Work monitors are 2 x 1280x1024 - FML and F it again
Funniest post I've read in ages lol
Associate
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2013
- Posts
- 421
Last edited:
Soldato
It ran perfectly. I haven't played it in about a year, decent settings (higher made no difference as its so old 
) and it crusied by at 60fps. BG or 10 man with lots going on could reduce to about 40fps, but all very playable.
) and it crusied by at 60fps. BG or 10 man with lots going on could reduce to about 40fps, but all very playable.I have the Phillips 40" monitor which allows me to run as a 34" superwide. What has been bothering me when using it either as SW or at native 4K, many games have aspects of the UI stuck right out in the upper left or right corners where I can't conveniently see them without moving my head. Most games anchor the UI so you can't move it about and in some games it's distracting to look away from the action to see your health, status, quest pop up or whatever.
Does anyone else find this a problem?
Does anyone else find this a problem?
Vanilla wow runs @ 3440x1440
See
RIP
#LETUSPLAY
I like your UI chipper, what you got running there ?
Associate
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2013
- Posts
- 421
Its from my time Nostalrius so its only viable on a vanilla private server...
Im at work atm but i can post a list of addons later if u want
got to second this recommendation i have my LG 34" on one of these and it could not be better!
Man of Honour
I have the Ergotron MX on 34" and it's perfectly fine too. IMO it looks much better and modern than the LX.
is there a 34" UW people would recommend for a 970? I'm torn between 1080 and 1440, although I think I'd prefer a 1440p as I'm wanting it to last a few years
Man of Honour
You can easily run 2560x1080 on a 34" 1440 UWA. I run Division at 2560x1080 and cannot tell the difference other than 15fps more performance on Ultra settings.
As above, there isn't really much, if any noticeable difference between 3440x1440 and 2560x1080 @34" in games, especially if you sit further back:
https://hardforum.com/threads/34-21...0-aoc-u3477pqu.1827296/page-2#post-1041126330
https://hardforum.com/threads/34-21...0-aoc-u3477pqu.1827296/page-2#post-1041126330
I may then go for a 1080p model and save some pennies
Permabanned
- Joined
- 5 Apr 2006
- Posts
- 7,699
What about desktop use, would he notice much of a difference there?
Yep definitely.
Much less screen real estate and pixels will be rather noticeable with text, although again, the latter largely depends on how far you sit to the screen.
I may then go for a 1080p model and save some pennies
If you can, I would try to wait until late Summer, we should be seeing some more 21.9 screens around then, not to mention, see what happens with free/g sync versions.
I'm less than a meter from my screen. But yeah, I think I'll wait until summer. July is my Birthday so I can con the wife into buying me one
