- Joined
- 30 Jul 2006
- Posts
- 12,130
No message.
Last edited:
Yeah it feels like there is a missing category here.
They didnt intend to kill themselves, so suicide or attempted suicide is not applicable. But simple accidental death doesnt do justice to the risk they placed themselves in, where there was a high probability of death.
Accidental suicide? Perhaps a good middle ground. Or self-manslaughter.
And you know how the families of the dead felt about it how exactly?
Oh, that's right, you don't know aught; let's blame the victims![]()
What victims?
The people who died chose to commit crimes and take risks in pursuit of profit. The risks were very small, so they decided to take the risk. They were unlucky.
The families who paid a lot of money and gambled their relatives' lives in the hope of gaining more money. They were unlucky.
The people who facilitate it in pursuit of profit and get caught? They're unlucky.
There aren't always victims, even when people die.
Let's say, for example, I play Russian roulette for a bet and die. That wouldn't make me a victim. It would make me unlucky - I took a risk and lost. Hard luck, sad for me. But not a victim.
Have to agree too tbh, the mass media have unfortunately just found the next big story though, that's all it is to them, a story, they don't really give a crap.I absolutely agree with this.
A few years back these people were "scum" and illegally entering the country, Tv programmes were made about them. No one had sympathy for illegal immigrants... NO ONE. Refugees, economic migrants, whatever. The negative view on them was the norm.
Now this year, they are unfortunate victims?
I know a few Vietnamese Women in Sweden, and they are bling, western obsessed, Instagram posting idiots. It's all about designed bags and clothes and milking money from anyone or anything that gives.
What's really going on? Mass media suddenly found their conscious?
Everything they did was a criminal act. They didn't deserve to die as a punishment for god’s sake, but if they had made it and got caught/deported at a later date, that would have been 100% just.
Indeed.Don’t illegally enter other people’s countries in dangerous ways and you’ll be fine.
What victims?
The people who died chose to commit crimes and take risks in pursuit of profit. The risks were very small, so they decided to take the risk. They were unlucky.
The families who paid a lot of money and gambled their relatives' lives in the hope of gaining more money. They were unlucky.
The people who facilitate it in pursuit of profit and get caught? They're unlucky.
There aren't always victims, even when people die.
Let's say, for example, I play Russian roulette for a bet and die. That wouldn't make me a victim. It would make me unlucky - I took a risk and lost. Hard luck, sad for me. But not a victim.
do you have compassion/an emotional response for every death you hear of?
I'm sure if you looked you'd be able to find more than 39 every day
Yes, because i'm not a psycho and actually have empathy for others rather than cold uncaring hatred. I don't necessarily go looking for it, i was hardly going to miss this news.
It's especially saddening considering the way they died, the way to resolve it would obviously to find a way to stop them from making the trip in the first place, because people are going to continue doing this, regardless.
too soonOne of the victims sent 'chilling messages saying she was going to die' according to the SUN.
They might not be victims, but is there no compassion or emotional response at all for their deaths?
Is that so much to ask?
One of the victims sent 'chilling messages saying she was going to die' according to the SUN.
Wheres his new cars, high living? all iv seen is a house worth 160k, which is to be honestly hardly a 'high life'
Does the UK have a category of "Death by misadventure"? That describes the "missing category" you refer to, but I don't know if it's in UK law.
Don’t illegally enter other people’s countries in dangerous ways and you’ll be fine.
I'd disagree with the arguments that these people aren't victims because they've been involved in something risky any/or were committing a (separate crime) themselves.
I mean if it were say a psycho truck driver who killed 5 roadside prostitutes and 1 lone cafe worker in some killing spree I presume people wouldn't be saying that there was only 1 victim as the other 5 were committing a criminal offence by soliciting.
Yes the victims in this migrant case were committing a criminal offence by illegally entering the UK, but someone has been criminally negligent in either shutting off some vent and suffocating them all (as happened in a previous case) or in setting the trailer to go too cold.