3d Mark 06 scores thread

spookywillow · 15 Feb 2007 at 15:50

second in what?

heres my latest 5448 top score for AMD and a single X1950pro, even beat a few C2D's

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1226750

Ronaldo · 15 Feb 2007 at 15:55

spookywillow said:
second in what?

heres my latest 5448 top score for AMD and a single X1950pro, even beat a few C2D's
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1226750

i got 5428 with 2x6800 ultra in SLi

and 10225 with 8800 GTS overlocked

3dmark06

Subliminal Aura · 15 Feb 2007 at 15:55

spookywillow said:
second in what?

Ranked 2nd compared to similar machine what a result !

spookywillow · 15 Feb 2007 at 16:52

oh i know, in that new result screen. well done

Lt Goody · 18 Feb 2007 at 17:44

Just tested mine for the first time:

6823 3d marks
SM2 2552
SM3 2918
CPU 2696

E6600 @ 3ghz
X1950XTX @ stock

LoadsaMoney · 18 Feb 2007 at 17:48

Might as well add my new cards in here.

3d Mark 06, everything stock = 8641.

GazD · 18 Feb 2007 at 18:29

7013 3D Marks
SM2.0 Score 2620
HDR/SM3.0 Score 2955
CPU Score 2910

System as sig except E6300 @ 3318Mhz

Darkwave · 19 Feb 2007 at 08:06

Spec as in signature, 10571 in 3D Mark '06.

ovia · 19 Feb 2007 at 08:14

Just built a m8 a system and so no verification or anything.

Everything at stock and running with supplied drivers.

System was a:
C2D 6400
2 GB Corsair Value RAM
8800GTs 320MB

Scored a very respectable 9500ish marks in 06.

Not bad for an untuned system, stock system.

Anyone know what sort of range this should get on 01?

Gunda · 19 Feb 2007 at 13:28

3DMark Score 9045 3DMarks

SM 2.0 Score 3916 Marks

SM 3.0 Score 3801 Marks

CPU Score 2675 Marks

BFG 8800 GTS 320Mb @ stock
E6600 @ 3.2Ghz
Windows Vist 32Bit
Nvidia drivers:
ForceWare Release 100
Version: 100.64

Graeme43 · 19 Feb 2007 at 14:47

11086

spec in sig tested on vista :rolleyes:

Lt Goody · 19 Feb 2007 at 15:33

The gts's are definately worth the money looking at these scores compared to my x1950xtx

good job i didn't pay much for it.

ShiWarrior · 19 Feb 2007 at 19:08

I see the guy with the opening post has been perm Banned, what do wre do now about the table :confused:

gt_junkie · 19 Feb 2007 at 21:15

ShiWarrior said:
I see the guy with the opening post has been perm Banned, what do wre do now about the table

No idea! If you look at the 'last updated' info it was actualy a year ago to the day!!!

gt

ShiWarrior · 19 Feb 2007 at 21:17

gt_junkie said:
No idea! If you look at the 'last updated' info it was actualy a year ago to the day!!!

gt

edited yes, but not tthe website page?!?!??

Higgins · 19 Feb 2007 at 21:27

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/Higginsis/10410.jpg

Newest score. Same spec as in sig but 635/2000 on the GFX.

stinka · 21 Feb 2007 at 18:30

new high score 11899 :cool:

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=14&XLID=0&UID=8092121

puts me at position 49 with a quad core behind me

as sig 8800gtx 636/2000

stinka

Doppleganger · 21 Feb 2007 at 19:21

New score of 9070 with new Geforce 8800GTX clocked to 633(621)/2068. I'm obviously well behind the Core 2 Duo guys which demonstrates what a difference that cpu has for benchmarking.

9070 3DMarks
SM2 4075
SM3 4534
CPU 1919

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1292095

stinka · 21 Feb 2007 at 19:36

wont go higher than 633? what are you using to overclock?

id guess rivatuner if so bump your fan upto 80% makes a massive difference to temps mine dropped 10 c

Doppleganger · 21 Feb 2007 at 19:42

stinka said:
wont go higher than 633? what are you using to overclock?

id guess rivatuner if so bump your fan upto 80% makes a massive difference to temps mine dropped 10 c

Well it will by a fair bit but I get artifacts in ATITool. I'm using Rivatuner and I'll try bumping the fan up - cheers.