Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I've tried following this and I keep getting blue screens when using IntelBurn. If I use the auto OC feature of the motherboard and set it to 5Ghz it's perfectly stable. Am I missing something?Judging by the average 8700k, I'd set 1.35vcore, 1.1 vccsa (up to 3200mhz memory), 1.05 vccio and it'll probably (TM) pass Prime stress tests. Set your avx offset to 4 to be conservative, reduce it if temps are good, and bring your volts down maybe 0.05 at a time until something fails. Good luck
Source: my (mediocre, tbh) 8700k runs 5.0 @ 1.355 vcore plus the above seems to be stable. You probably won't need more. Do not push vccsa or vccio unless you're already bumping higher vcore. It was a total red herring for me and pumped temps more than the vcore did. Fortunately 8 Pack set me straight before I got completely frustrated and gave up
Be interested to know if you try using offset and if so, how it goes. I'm fine with fixed on my Asrock Taichi, but having a hard time settling in with offset.
the cpu volts is always lower in windows then the bios, its a bit off putting, cos which one is right if any?
Yes exactly this.Is delid when you remove the cover from the cpu and redo the paste?
the cpu volts is always lower in windows then the bios, its a bit off putting, cos which one is right if any?
I am tempted to just keep the motherboards auto 5Ghz overclock.
While sort of true, it's worth mentioning that boards with really good LLC can more or less completely negate the vdroop under load. I have mine set to 1.355 in bios, and HWInfo reads 1.348 min to 1.36 max. It's entirely down to the motherboard as to whether the bios setting ends up being the true value
Quick copy pasta from silicon lottery...
As of 6/17/18, the top 92% of tested 8086Ks were able to hit 5.1GHz or greater.
As of 6/17/18, the top 60% of tested 8086Ks were able to hit 5.2GHz or greater.
As of 6/17/18, the top 14% of tested 8086Ks were able to hit 5.3GHz or greater.
As of 6/08/18, the top 50% of tested 8700Ks were able to hit 5.1GHz or greater.
As of 6/08/18, the top 17% of tested 8700Ks were able to hit 5.2GHz or greater.
(None hit 5.3, apparently.)
Which is actually pretty interesting, because that is some serious binning if you want a 5.1 or better! Now I'm really tempted by one... I'm constantly bottlenecked by single-thread speeds, and that might be the fastest I'm going to see for at least 12 months. If not ever. Starting to think the gigahertz race has capped out and we'll never see 6, or even 5.5...
(I wonder what OCUK's premium for a 5.1 will be... no more than £100 over retail and I'm sold, tbqh.)
There is noise the Z390 might be cancelled and the Z370 replacing it:
https://forums.anandtech.com/thread...nput-everything.2519949/page-58#post-39472971
This is stupid, only 1 sku with HT?