alternatively if i went to 2 Builds, What would you do?
(also consider the gaming build would be 1080p 240hz)
First up I'd look at what cards can run your games at 240FPS
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
alternatively if i went to 2 Builds, What would you do?
(also consider the gaming build would be 1080p 240hz)
alternatively if i went to 2 Builds, What would you do?
(also consider the gaming build would be 1080p 240hz)
Gaming at 1080p, I'd be going for an Intel CPU. If the other system was a work/productivity one then most likely an AMD CPU.
This, if it's pure gaming get the Intel 6 core non hyperthread CPU, or wait out the new 8 core one, lob on a 1080ti and it's job done
For the productivity TR rig just slap in the cheapest GPU you can as your not going to game on it.
so im sticking with 1440/144hz
1 PC
So got decide my platform. need 8cores or more
one thing that pushing me towards intel at this point is it would be nice to get into MATX form factor
yeh not a fan of Asrock BIOS/QaulityAsRock do do a m-ATX X399 board https://www.overclockers.co.uk/asro...tr4-ddr4-micro-atx-motherboard-mb-165-ak.html the reviews else seem to suggest its fairly good (albeit there are only 4 memory slots and fewer expansions ports than the ATX versions).
So currently i already have 1800X. (8 cores/16T) its just not enough perf in Software workloads. so thinking 10 cores+ is best for me. But my software also loves clock speed too. sdo its finding that mix of COre/Clock
9900K is a nice idea but i would need at-least the 9950X (whatever it would be called)
So basically i need cores + at 3.6+ 99% of the time. again only think putting me off the 2950X is gaming.
My Workload is 60% Gaming 40% work, but when i game i do also set stuff to run in the background also. Currently
when doing so my 1800X is hitting good 80-95% & 12-14GB RAM used.
visual studio for me uses 4.5GB-6GB on its own on its own
Typical day Multitasking Workload At the same time:
Gaming - Visual Studio Compile - Chrome/Youtube/Spotify - Discord - Msi Afterburner - Visual code
think of it as Gaming/streaming workloads but with much higher memory usage.
usage + % percentage of time open
Gaming 60%
VS code 40%
VS Studio 40%
Chrome 100%
Discord/MSi Afterburner 60%
If you are using an AIO you might want to look at the Enermax ELC-LTTR360-TBP which is a 360mm unit that has a water block with full coverage for the TR4 heat spreader.
I'd also move the 250GB 970 Evo up to 500GB, or just dump the SATA drive and get a 1TB 970 EVO as they are only £285 from most places.
If you are using an AIO you might want to look at the Enermax ELC-LTTR360-TBP which is a 360mm unit that has a water block with full coverage for the TR4 heat spreader.
I'd also move the 250GB 970 Evo up to 500GB, or just dump the SATA drive and get a 1TB 970 EVO as they are only £285 from most places.
so things have changed for me a little, im moved from
my main monitor being a 1440p gsync to 1080p gsync 240hz.
with 1440p gsync as my secondary and 4K gsync as my third.
Due to this my 1800X is 95% cpu usage in games too now. I think i might need to go Intel for 1080p high hz...
not to sure on 7000 or 9000 series now...
but 8700 seem lot less future proof & sidestep/back step
and if i get a different build for the GF i casn use the 1800X for Development
ocuk dont stock many x399 anymore but swapped it for a rog zenith for the 2x 8 pin (maybe some ocing )Have you considered the Asrock Taichi instead? I see the Prime only had 2x m.2 and generally seems to be quite stripped down.
ocuk dont stock many x399 anymore but swapped it for a rog zenith for the 2x 8 pin (maybe some ocing )