• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

7970 Lightning, worth the premium?

But the mb is pci-e 3.0 ready and the card actively supports 16x 3.0 so what is there to activate?

The problem persists when I have a website where flash is needed

EDIT: When I'm in the efi bios in the gpu or memory dimms section where it displays the pictures of the GPU and RAM it only shows half of their picture sort of flickering. Could just be a 1404 bug I guess but still weird.
 
Last edited:
Nic88 wrote :

Quick question: will the ASUS Rampage IV Extreme X79 fully support PCI-E 3.0?
I might upgrade to a 3-SLI 680 configuration in the future.

Also, for PCI-E 3.0 will there be a difference between Ivy and Sandy-E? If yes, what will it be?

The R4E is PCIe 3.0 compatible, the original SB-E spec (was) PCIe 3.0 (8 GT/s), the AMD 7000 series runs PCIe 3.0 on the SB-E, currently nVidia has disabled PCIe 3.0 on the SB-E -- BUT there are registry modifications where it will run PCIe 3.0.

The IB 16 lanes of PCIe 3.0 vs SB-E 32 lanes of PCIe 3.0 on AMD & 32 lanes of PCIe 2.0 on nVidia. AFAIK the IB 'should' be validated PCIe 3.0 by nVidia and I hope to see the same on SB-E since (see below) it clearly can run PCIe 3.0.

This is a copy/paste from another similar post I replied to:
The issues:
1. Most LGA 2011 have some sort of BIOS PCIe 3.0 update, requiring an update:
X79 Extreme9 (BIOS version 2.0 is the latest, but no ref to PCIe 3.0 update) - http://www.asrock.com/mb/download. [...] me9&o=BIOS
2. nVidia must validate PCIe 3.0 on SB-E. To date it's limited to PCIe 2.0:
"*GeForce GTX 680 supports PCI Express 3.0. The Intel X79/SNB-E PCI Express 2.0 platform is only currently supported up to 5GT/s (PCIE 2.0) bus speeds even though some motherboard manufacturers have enabled higher 8GT/s speeds."

The hack may or may not work...

Frankly, PCIe 2.0 vs PCIe 3.0 on today's GPU's does zip *, and with 2-WAY PCIe 2.0 x16/x16 on LGA 2011 is the same bandwidth as 2-WAY PCIe 3.0 x8/x8 on IB + LGA 1155 with GEN3 or Z77's. PCIe 3.0 becomes relevant once 4K Monitors became available to the 'Consumer' and in mass production, but by then it's going to be time to upgrade your PC & GPU(s).

PCIe 3.0 vs 2.0 - http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/for [...] ew-21.html
* EXTREME PCIe 3.0 vs 2.0 - http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.aspx [...] print=true

Registry fix (hack) to force the GTX 680 to run in PCIe 3.0 mode; see - http://*******.com/7awc9lv (RMPcieLinkSpeed, DWORD = 0004, etc).

The HD 7000 series does run in PCIe 3.0 mode on LGA 2011.

You may also want to read - http://www.techpowerup.com/162942/ [...] stems.html
GeForce GTX 680 supports PCI Express 3.0. It operates properly within the SIG PCI Express Specification and has been validated on multiple upcoming PCI Express 3.0 platforms. Some motherboard manufacturers have released updated SBIOS to enable the Intel X79/SNB-E PCI Express 2.0 platform to run at up to 8GT/s bus speeds. NVIDIA is currently working to validate X79/SNB-E with GTX 680 at these speeds with the goal of enabling 8GT/s via a future software update. Until this validation is complete, the GTX 680 will operate at PCIE 2.0 speeds on X79/SNB-E-based motherboards with the latest web drivers.

Ivy Bridge and Z77 Chipset (Panther Point):


HD 7900 Series running PCIe 3.0 on SB-E:


GTX 600 Series running PCIe 3.0 on SB-E (fix applied):


Message edited by Jaquith on 04-24-2012 at 03:26:22 PM
 
That's never happened to me before. The only black outs I've received since owning this setup was occasionally when my gpu drivers were messing up.

I am getting this bug now with my card as it's showing in GPU-z that it's staying on PCI-E x16 v2.0 rather than v1.1 under no stress.

My OSD is showing my clocks at 675/1375 which isn't an OSD bug as it's drastically decreasing my fps.

So confused.

EDIT: My asic went down by 0.1%. Is that possible?


when you say its @ 675/1375 what exactly are you running, because your card will automatically adjusts its clocks to what it requires upto its maximum speed, i just ran a vid off youtube and it was at 500/1375
 
I'm aware that the GPU clocks down but when under stress it shouldn't clock down especially when it's as obvious as closing the website in question then everything working fine and reopening it and the bug appearing.

I've disabled hardware acceleration too so I'm just going to assume it's this website alone. Nevermind about that :) but the whole decrease in asic has stumped me
 
Remembered to bring home a volt meter tonight ;)

OK

Stock voltage at idle:

GPUZ: 0.850v
AB: 0.862v
Meter: 0.861v

Stock voltage load:

GPUZ: 1.170v
AB: 1.186v
Meter: 1.184v

1.2v, stock clocks:

GPUZ: 1.170v
AB: 1.201v
Meter: 1.201v

VDDCI:

Stock: 0.9v
+30 aux: 0.93v

Memory, stock voltage:

AB: 1.600v
Meter: 1.603v

Memory @ 1.649v:

AB: 1.649v
Meter: 1.653v

So in short, trust AB voltage readings NOT GPUZ. GPUZ is reading the voltage regulator incorrectly.
 
From what I could understand its the voltage drawn from the actual PCI slot, it pulls an extra 30mv with the slider maxed out. I didn't see any voltage change adjusting the power tune slider, though you may see change in amperage or watts doing so.

Edit: The reactor core thing seemingly adds another few power phases or something to reduce ripple, I can't imagine its needed for much outside of sub zero cooling.
 
Decided to get a little more serious with overclocking this thing:

not%20bad.jpg
 
1250/1700 @ 1.29/1.649v +0mv/+0%. I may be able to get higher clocks/lower voltages, just fired in some starting figures to see what the card can handle. Gives me a starting point to save mucking about with lower speeds first. Fairly confident I'll be able to break 1300mhz with this.
 
1250/1700 @ 1.29/1.649v +0mv/+0%. I may be able to get higher clocks/lower voltages, just fired in some starting figures to see what the card can handle. Gives me a starting point to save mucking about with lower speeds first. Fairly confident I'll be able to break 1300mhz with this.

Nice one mate but dam it it your gonna knock me down on top 10!!
 
Nice one mate but dam it it your gonna knock me down on top 10!!

Hehe, I'll be happy with top 3, with a little help from water of course :)

Already smashed my 670 record (currently the highest scoring 670 on the heaven thread).

Lets see if we can make the whole top 10 for 1080 red? :D:cool:
 
Driver?
Whats the caps for and do you use?
Temps?
If on AB whats your unofficial overclocking mode set too and is ccc running whilst using AB?

Not tried max oc on new drivers yet, so dont know if theres a difference

My ASIC is still the same!
 
12.4 no cap, ab set unlocked with the xcl (or what ever its called) work around, overclocking in ccc is disabled.


Temps peaked at 63c core, around 45c on memory and vrm, 1:1 fan profile.
 
12.4 no cap, ab set unlocked with the xcl (or what ever its called) work around, overclocking in ccc is disabled.


Temps peaked at 63c core, around 45c on memory and vrm, 1:1 fan profile.

Whats the xcl workaround?
1:1 fan is that 100% or a 45deg straight line?

Have you had any lock ups/ crashes beyond that voltage or have you not tried?
 
Back
Top Bottom