9/11 - Controlled demolition?

JRS · 12 Sep 2006 at 14:50

Nicola said:
no wonder the goverment get away with so much, the majority have there heads in the sand

Oh good Lord.....

Nicola said:
btw do you ppl really belive that they found a hijackers wallet? beacuse that is the excuse that the goverment used to tie the hijackers to 911 ,i watched it myself on the day of the attack (so do u ppl belive this yes-no?)

I can't honestly say I care either way really. So I'm not going to play your yes-no game.

Nicola said:
oh if a bird can do that much damage think what a steel beams would do

And what damage would the steel beam take? Answer - quite a lot. In fact, stationary bean with plane moving at quite a rate would easily snap the beam clean in half unless it was particularly huge.

Nicola said:
as for my spelling im dylexic and basicly i dont care what ppl think about my spelling, i by sell cars for myself and any paper work i have my gf do it (shes in her 3rd year of law) ,i basicly better with dealing with ppl face to face ,i posted here bacuse tbh i cant belive that most of u guys cant see the bigger picture,

Most dyslexic people I know at least make an attempt at making their typing understandable.

Nicola said:
it's a realy shame that some ppl are so negitive and i think your a fool if u dont think that there is lets say somthing suspicious

Right.....so first I'm out of touch with reality, now I'm a fool. Keep it up princess, you're really doing a great job convincing me that you have an IQ greater than that of a ham sandwich....

Nicola · 12 Sep 2006 at 14:55

JRS said:
Oh good Lord.....

I can't honestly say I care either way really. So I'm not going to play your yes-no game.

And what damage would the steel beam take? Answer - quite a lot. In fact, stationary bean with plane moving at quite a rate would easily snap the beam clean in half unless it was particularly huge.

Most dyslexic people I know at least make an attempt at making their typing understandable.

Right.....so first I'm out of touch with reality, now I'm a fool. Keep it up princess, you're really doing a great job convincing me that you have an IQ greater than that of a ham sandwich....

there is more to iq than words or spelling, comman knowlage street knowlage

Zip · 12 Sep 2006 at 14:59

Nicola said:
there is more to iq than words or spelling, comman knowlage street knowlage

I think hes calling you dumb for calling him and the rest of us dumb for believing Hi jacked planes did hit the Pentagon and the twin towers. And Calling you dumb because you believe so strongly about it being a Conspiracy you think we all have our heads in the sand.
Stop trying to use your spelling as a come back towards him.

gjc10212 · 12 Sep 2006 at 14:59

Nicola said:
there is more to iq than words or spelling, comman knowlage street knowlage

I believe IQ is generally deemed a guide to one's standard of common knowledge and how generally focused you are. Thats what they were saying on Test the Nation anyway

Nobody bneeds to kkmnow how to spell thats what speell chx are 3.,

Nicola · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:00

yeah in america the girls were getting better marks than the boys so they added some more football questions

next

Zip · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:03

Nicola said:
next

Are you a guy or girl? :confused:

Red and White · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:05

havent read whole thread. and sorry if repost.

more conspiracy crap here

open Microsoft Word
Type in Q33 NY in capitals (this is the flight number of the 1st plane to hit the World Trade centre,

change Font Size to 48
Change Font to Wingdings

JRS · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:08

Clerkin said:
havent read whole thread. and sorry if repost.

more conspiracy crap here

open Microsoft Word
Type in Q33 NY in capitals (this is the flight number of the 1st plane to hit the World Trade centre,

change Font Size to 48
Change Font to Wingdings

Great....only Q33NY wasn't the flight number

Hoaxy hoaxy hoax

***edit***

But you probably already knew that.

pinkegobox · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:08

i've not read this thread, just wanted to post my response.

"No it wasn't, and even if it was you will never be able to prove otherwise until someone on the inside comes out with conclusive evidence(unlikely). get over it."

Red and White · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:10

again sorry if repost

but it was the devil apparently

Samtheman1k · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:10

Clerkin said:
havent read whole thread. and sorry if repost.

more conspiracy crap here

open Microsoft Word
Type in Q33 NY in capitals (this is the flight number of the 1st plane to hit the World Trade centre,

change Font Size to 48
Change Font to Wingdings

That's quite cool. Well, at least would be if Q33 NY was even a valid flight number!

EDIT: Damn...too slow!

Red and White · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:10

JRS said:
Great....only Q33NY wasn't the flight number

Hoaxy hoaxy hoax

***edit***

But you probably already knew that.

pretty much why i said "more conspiracy crap"

JRS · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:11

Clerkin said:
but it was the devil apparently

"I peeked at the end....the Devil did it."

/Trapper John

singist · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:13

Zip said:
They found Chunks of engine in the Building

There are Photos to prove it.
They got in side with out Making there own small holes in the wall because the wing more then likely folding up under the plane when the hit the wall.

Sorry mate, given the jet/wall vid' you cited earlier; not a chance in hell that the wings "folded" up to the side of the plane and followed the path of the fuselage.

You seem to hold very strong views and become somewhat abusive of anyone who thinks differently to the official version of things; do you have a reason for this that we don't know of?

I think that most people who want better answers respect the dead and their families every bit as much as you and some other people, so try not to be quite such a **** in future and accept that things "may" not be as we have all been told.

Peace cobber

Zip · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:14

Clerkin said:
again sorry if repost

but it was the devil apparently

TBH i saw that when i was First made/discovered, (I dont know if its a photoshop or not) And if thats not a Photoshop then thats damm freaky :eek:

Zip · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:19

singist said:
Sorry mate, given the jet/wall vid' you cited earlier; not a chance in hell that the wings "folded" up to the side of the plane and followed the path of the fuselage.

You seem to hold very strong views and become somewhat abusive of anyone who thinks differently to the official version of things; do you have a reason for this that we don't know of?

I think that most people who want better answers respect the dead and their families every bit as much as you and some other people, so try not to be quite such a **** in future and accept that things "may" not be as we have all been told.

Peace cobber

There was no penetration on the video i posted though, With penetration it would have had the chance to bend under.

With no penetration there is no where to bend so it just goes into the wall.

My defensiveness and some what attackingness in these threads are because im really just sick of all this Conspiracy BS.

Every tome someone Posts some pretty conclusive evidence to what had been said to start with and what i think happened they get shot down and conspiracy theorists just brush it all off.
If they want to do that to us ill do it to them.

Look at a website that was Originally posted by Rich_L and you wills see the truth of the Pentagon attack.

Nicola · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:20

ive tried to get ppl thinking ,hasnt worked lets try this then what evidence do we have that it was hijackers.

and dont attack me just answer the question, or dont

JRS · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:21

Nicola said:
there is more to iq than words or spelling, comman knowlage street knowlage

Hey, you were the one who called me a fool and claimed that I'm out of touch with reality simply because I happen to think that some of the conspiracy theories about the 9/11 attack hold about as much water as a thimble with holes in it.

growse · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:27

Nicola said:
ive tried to get ppl thinking ,hasnt worked lets try this then what evidence do we have that it was hijackers.

and dont attack me just answer the question, or dont

Seriously, we've been over this. Read the thread. People are really really annoyed because you've not read the thread, and we don't want to go over the points again in language a 4-year-old can understand.

Trust me when I tell you that you're clueless.

Nicola · 12 Sep 2006 at 15:28

JRS said:
Hey, you were the one who called me a fool and claimed that I'm out of touch with reality simply because I happen to think that some of the conspiracy theories about the 9/11 attack hold about as much water as a thimble with holes in it.

it was not directed at you it was just a general coment